Cited by 135Motor Control and AdaptationRobotic Locomotion and ControlEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Spikes alone do not behavior make: why neuroscience needs biomechanics

Open access
Tytell, ED, Holmes, P, Cohen, AH·2011·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Neural circuits do not function in isolation; they interact with the physical world, accepting sensory inputs and producing outputs via muscles. Since both these pathways are constrained by physics, the activity of neural circuits can only be understood by considering biomechanics of muscles, bodies, and the exterior world. We discuss how animal bodies have natural stable motions that require relatively little activation or control from the nervous system. The nervous system can substantially alter these motions, by subtly changing mechanical properties such as leg sti ness. Mechanics can also provide robustness to perturbations without sensory reflexes. By considering a complete neuromechanical system, neuroscientists and biomechanicians together can provide a more integrated view of neural circuitry and behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2011.05.017

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tytell, E., Holmes, P., & Cohen, A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Tytell, ED
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
21
Issue
5
Pages
816-822
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074310014
Cited by
135
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH62196, P50MH062196)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS054271, F32NS054367)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
neuromechanics, neural circuits, muscle mechanics, body stiffness, leg stiffness, robustness to disturbances, sensory reflexes, neural control of movement, behavior
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Neurosciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review