Cited by 81Hearing Loss and RehabilitationTactile and Sensory InteractionsHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Auditory cortical plasticity in cochlear implant users.

Open access
Glennon, Erin, Svirsky, Mario A, Froemke, Robert C·2020·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Cochlear implants are one of the most successful neuroprosthetic devices that have been developed to date. Profoundly deaf patients can achieve speech perception after complete loss of sensory input. Despite the improvements many patients experience, there is still a large degree of outcome variability. It has been proposed that central plasticity may be a major factor in the different levels of benefit that patients experience. However, the neural mechanisms of how plasticity impacts cochlear implant learning and the degree of plasticity's influence remain unknown. Here, we review the human and animal research on three of the main ways that central plasticity affects cochlear implant outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2019.11.003

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glennon, E., Svirsky, M. A., & Froemke, R. C.
Affiliations
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Svirsky, Mario A
  • Froemke, Robert C
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
60
Pages
108-114
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995831580
Cited by
81
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
cochlear implants, central plasticity, profound hearing loss, speech perception, neuroprosthetics, outcome variability, auditory cortex, animal models
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Cortex, Cochlear Implants, Deafness, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Speech Perception, Cochlear Implantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review