In-situ assessment of timber structural members: Combining information from visual strength grading and NDT/SDT methods – A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Globally it is accepted that results obtained through non-destructive/semi-destructive methods have large variability, therefore they must be combined together to decrease subjectivity for both an initial survey and more detailed surveys.
“Globally it is accepted that the results obtained through these methods have large variability, therefore they must be combined together as to decrease its subjectivity for both an initial survey, as well as in more detailed surveys [50].”
From A review on the mechanical properties of aged wood and salvaged timber (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
All other authors reported a significant reduction in impact bending strength, with values up to 70% obtained while testing small and clear specimens of hinoki and keyaki aged up to 1300 and 650 years respectively.
“All the other authors reported a significant reduction [4,50,57] with values up to 70% [9] obtained while testing small and clear specimens of hinoki and keyaki aged up to 1300 and 650 years respectively.”
From A review on the mechanical properties of aged wood and salvaged timber (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
Cites
Guidelines for On-Site Assessment of Historic Timber Structures
Cruz, H., Yeomans, D., Tsakanika, E., Macchioni, N., Jorissen, A., Touza, M., Mannucci, M., & Lourenço, P. B. (2015) · International Journal of Architectural Heritage · doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.774070 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Sousa, H. S., Machado, J. S., Branco, J. M., & Lourenço, P. B. (2015) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.127 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantification of different NDT/SDT methods in respect to estimate the load-bearing capacity
Fink, G., & Kohler, J. (2015) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.015 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review on the mechanical properties of aged wood and salvaged timber
Cavalli, A., Cibecchini, D., Togni, M., & Sousa, H. S. (2016) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.001 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Xin, Z., Fu, R., Zong, Y., Ke, D., Zhang, H., Yu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2022) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129476 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Feio, A., & Machado, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Lusíada University of Lisbon (PT)
- National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Feio, Artur
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 101
- Pages
- 1157-1165
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W778797321
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 8.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering Research
- Keywords
- timber structural members, non-destructive testing, semi-destructive testing, in situ assessment, sawn timber, strength reduction factor, defect localization, stress distribution, wood mechanical properties
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
