Cited by 218Wood Treatment and PropertiesMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisCultural Heritage Management and Preservation

Guidelines for On-Site Assessment of Historic Timber Structures

Open access
Cruz, Helena, Yeomans, David, Tsakanika, Eleftheria, Macchioni, Nicola, Jorissen, Andre, Touza, Manuel, Mannucci, Massimo, Lourenço, Paulo B.·2015·International Journal of Architectural Heritage

Abstract

In the scope of European Cooperation in Science and Technology–Wood Science for Conservation of Cultural Heritage (COST IE0601–WoodCultHer) (available at http://www.woodculther.org) it was agreed to produce Guidelines for the Assessment of Historic Timber Structures, covering the principles and possible approaches for the safety assessment of old timber structures of historical relevance that could be used as the basis for possible European Standards, as discussed with CEN/TC346 (Conservation of Cultural Heritage).This approach was targeted at all those concerned with the conservation of heritage buildings. These guidelines should also help decision-making regarding the need for immediate safety measures. The aim is to guarantee that inspection and assessment measures provide the necessary data for historical analysis, structural safety assessment, and planning of intervention works, while having minimal impact on the building fabric (the original materials, structural systems, and techniques).This article provides information on the criteria to be used in the assessment of load-bearing timber structures in heritage buildings. It covers the preliminary assessment (desk survey, preliminary visual survey, measured survey, structural analysis, and preliminary report), as well as the detailed survey of timbers (with a special emphasis on visual strength grading on site) and carpentry joints. The subsequent diagnostic report and the detailed design of repairs are outside its scope.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15583058.2013.774070

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most of these VSG standards tend to downgrade recovered timber.

    “most of these VSG stan­ dards tend to downgrade recovered timber [20 -23].”

    From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

    The available indexed passages are a title and bibliographic metadata (including an Abstract-labelled entry, with no page number), not discussion of visual strength grading. Searches for VSG, grading standards, and downgrading recovered or reclaimed timber found no passage that addresses the claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cruz, H., Yeomans, D., Tsakanika, E., Macchioni, N., Jorissen, A., Touza, M., Mannucci, M., & Lourenço, P. B.
Affiliations
  • National Laboratory for Civil Engineering (PT)
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
  • Istituto per la Valorizzazione del Legno e delle Specie Arboree (IT)
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Minho (PT)
Corresponding author
Cruz, Helena
Venue
International Journal of Architectural Heritage
Published
2014-11-25
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
277-289
ISSN
  • 1558-3058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3066
OpenAlex
W2079446554
Cited by
218
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
22.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • International Journal of Architectural Heritage (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Keywords
historic timber structures, on-site evaluation, structural safety assessment, heritage building conservation, load-bearing timber structures, carpentry joints, visual surveys, structural analysis, non-invasive inspection, repair planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review