Cited by 184Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsConcrete Properties and Behavior

Influence of nanoparticles on fluidity and mechanical properties of cement mortar

Liu, Jintao, Li, Qinghua, Xu, Shilang·2015·Construction and Building Materials

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.149

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 184

Authors
Liu, J., Li, Q., & Xu, S.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Qinghua
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
101
Pages
892-901
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2218904521
Cited by
184
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of China (2012BAJ13B04)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete Properties and Behavior
Keywords
nanoparticles, cement mortar, nano-SiO2, Al2O3 nanoparticles, nano-TiO2, zinc oxide nanoparticles, mortar fluidity, compressive strength, flexural strength, setting time, degree of hydration, microstructure, water demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review