Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 680

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Durability of ultra-high performance concrete – A review

Li, Junquan, Wu, Zemei, Shi, Caijun, Yuan, Qiang, Zhang, Zuhua·2020·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

Abstract Ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) is more durable than conventional concrete (CC) and high-performance concrete (HPC) owing to the use of low water-to-binder ratio (W/B) of approximately 0.2 and high amount of fine particles. It is an innovative composite material that can serve as a potential candidate for concrete structures exposing to aggressive environments. A comprehensive investigation of the durability characteristics of UHPC is essential to provide fundamental information for material testing requirements and procedures and expand its practical applications. This paper reviews the durability of UHPC in terms of water and chloride-ion permeability, corrosion of steel reinforcement, carbonation, freeze–thaw resistance, chemical attack resistance, alkali-silica reaction, abrasion resistance, and fire resistance. Influential factors, including W/B, curing regime, steel fiber volume, fiber hybridization, specimen size, and testing age, were considered. It is obvious that: (1) UHPC has very low permeability to water and chemical substance, which is about one to two orders of magnitude lower than that of CC and HPC; (2) Carbonation rarely happens on UHPC, either under standard curing or heat curing, after 1 to 3 years exposure. (3) Corrosion of steel reinforcement and alkali-silica reaction are not concerns for UHPC under any curing regime due to its low permeability. (4) UHPC is found to gain increases in mass, strength, and relative dynamic modulus over hundreds of freeze–thaw cycles. (5) Compared to CC and HPC, UHPC is more prone to explosive spalling due to the increase in vapor pressure and non-uniform thermal gradient. Partly or completely filled micro-cracks by carbonation and/or continued hydration of cement are beneficial to improving the mechanical strength and microstructure of UHPC. Hybridization of steel and polypropylene fibers is an efficient approach to mitigate the explosive spalling of UHPC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119296

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Li, J., Wu, Z., Shi, C., Yuan, Q., & Zhang, Z.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
255
Pages
119296
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3021671912
Cited by
680
References
3
FWCI
38.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Durability of ultra-high performance concrete – A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119296
The paper
Li, J., Wu, Z., Shi, C., Yuan, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Durability of ultra-high performance concrete – A review. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119296

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.