The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review
Abstract
Abstract Accurate prediction of the mechanical properties of concrete has been a concern since these properties are often required by design codes. The emergence of new concrete mixtures and applications has motivated researchers to pursue reliable models for predicting mechanical strength. Empirical and statistical models, such as linear and nonlinear regression, have been widely used. However, these models require laborious experimental work to develop, and can provide inaccurate results when the relationships between concrete properties and mixture composition and curing conditions are complex. To overcome such drawbacks, several Machine Learning (ML) models have been proposed as an alternative approach for predicting the mechanical strength of concrete. The present study examines ML models for forecasting the mechanical properties of concrete, including artificial neural networks, support vector machine, decision trees, and evolutionary algorithms. The application of each model and its performance are critically discussed and analyzed, thus identifying practical recommendations, current knowledge gaps, and needed future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emerging Artificial Intelligence Methods in Structural Engineering
Salehi, H., & Burgueño, R. (2018) · Engineering Structures · doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.05.084 · Cited by 1,068
Evolutionary algorithms: A critical review and its future prospects
Vikhar, P. A. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Global Trends in Signal Processing, Information Computing and Communication (ICGTSPICC) · doi:10.1109/icgtspicc.2016.7955308 · Cited by 486
Cited by
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Machine learning in concrete science: applications, challenges, and best practices
Li, Z., Yoon, J., Zhang, R., Rajabipour, F., Srubar III, W. V., Dabo, I., & Radlińska, A. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00810-x · Cited by 388
Tapeh, A. T. G., & Naser, M. Z. (2023) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-022-09793-w · Cited by 320
Stergiou, K., Ntakolia, C., Varytis, P., Koumoulos, E., Karlsson, P., & Moustakidis, S. (2023) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112031 · Cited by 161
Liu, J.-C., Huang, L., Tian, Z., & Ye, H. (2021) · Construction and Building Materials · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123946 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Ben Chaabene, W., Flah, M., & Nehdi, M. L.
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 260
- Pages
- 119889
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3038033549
- Cited by
- 779
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 48.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889
- The paper
- Ben Chaabene, W., Flah, M., & Nehdi, M. L. (2020). Machine learning prediction of mechanical properties of concrete: Critical review. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.