Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 532

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties

Amran, Mugahed, Debbarma, Solomon, Ozbakkaloglu, Togay·2021·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

Abstract Since fly ash (FA) is widely available across the globe, which is used to produce the next generation green concrete for the modern construction. The FA is a pozzolanic material with high alumina and silica content that gives a cementitious property in the presence of water. Thereby, FA-based geopolymer concrete (FA-GPC) seems to be a superlative option over the conventional concrete, to be developed. Using cost-effective and commonly obtainable FA as mineral fillers in concrete brings plentiful advantages to reduce the consumption of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), eliminate the disposal of FA in landfills, and decrease the CO2 emissions, which all contribute toward a clean environment. With FA, a durable FA-GPC is a comparatively new, revolutionary and sustainable engineered composite material with several benefits, including the high early strength and improved durability properties (such as reduced permeability) against aggressive environments. Production of sustainable and greener concretes has become a major interest in the construction industry globally. This paper reviews the clean production, factors affecting the durability of FA-GPC, and the human health and environmental impacts of FA disposal. This review also aims to provide a critical review on the long-term durability properties and the behavior of FA-GPC composites, in addition to synopsize the research development trends to generate comprehensive insights into the potential applications of FA as a sustainable and ecofriendly construction material, for making greener concrete composite, towards industrialize environmentally buildings today.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857

Cites

144 of 144 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 144 references

Cited by

See all 532

Metadata

Authors
Amran, M., Debbarma, S., & Ozbakkaloglu, T.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
270
Pages
121857
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111242882
Cited by
532
References
144
FWCI
38.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857
The paper
Amran, M., Debbarma, S., & Ozbakkaloglu, T. (2021). Fly ash-based eco-friendly geopolymer concrete: A critical review of the long-term durability properties. Construction and Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.