Cited by 14Wood Treatment and PropertiesMasonry and Concrete Structural AnalysisStructural Engineering and Materials Analysis

In situ assessment of the timber structure of an 18th century building in Madrid, Spain

Open access
Arriaga, Francisco, Osuna-Sequera, Carlos, Esteban, Miguel, Íñiguez-González, Guillermo, Bobadilla, Ignacio·2021·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

The timber structural members of a seven-story building from the end of the 18th century were evaluated following a procedure based on previous research works. The structure consisted of timber-framed brick walls and heavy timber floors with mortar filling. Non-destructive measurements were taken in 13 sampling areas of the floors and framed walls. Detailed measurements of at least 3 pieces in each sample were taken (stress wave Time-of-Flight and probing tests). Mean density and modulus of elasticity values and characteristic values of bending and compression strength were estimated. On-site load tests were carried out on three floor slabs to deduce their actual bending stiffness and compare it with estimation by NDT. They behaved more rigidly than expected, which is explained by floor screed stiffness, the transverse stiffness effect and possible semi-rigid connection behaviour at the supports. Structural verification determined the required strength of the critical members to compare this with the estimated strengths, showing a correct safety level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124466

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber is in line with findings by other authors.

    “Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber, is in line with findings by other authors; the most common singularities affecting recovered timber being holes and damage [13], together with warp and fissures [23].”
  • The most common singularities affecting recovered timber are holes and damage, together with warp and fissures.

    “Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber, is in line with findings by other authors; the most common singularities affecting recovered timber being holes and damage [13], together with warp and fissures [23].”
  • Most of these VSG standards tend to downgrade recovered timber.

    “most of these VSG stan­ dards tend to downgrade recovered timber [20 -23].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 14

Authors
Arriaga, F., Osuna-Sequera, C., Esteban, M., Íñiguez-González, G., & Bobadilla, I.
Affiliations
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Arriaga, Francisco
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
304
Pages
124466
ISSN
0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3198756816
Cited by
14
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (OTT- VAGI19FAM)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
Keywords
timber structures, historic buildings, 18th-century buildings, wood flooring, non-destructive testing, elastic modulus, wood density, flexural strength, compressive strength, bending stiffness, structure confirmation, structural safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review