In situ assessment of the timber structure of an 18th century building in Madrid, Spain
Open accessAbstract
The timber structural members of a seven-story building from the end of the 18th century were evaluated following a procedure based on previous research works. The structure consisted of timber-framed brick walls and heavy timber floors with mortar filling. Non-destructive measurements were taken in 13 sampling areas of the floors and framed walls. Detailed measurements of at least 3 pieces in each sample were taken (stress wave Time-of-Flight and probing tests). Mean density and modulus of elasticity values and characteristic values of bending and compression strength were estimated. On-site load tests were carried out on three floor slabs to deduce their actual bending stiffness and compare it with estimation by NDT. They behaved more rigidly than expected, which is explained by floor screed stiffness, the transverse stiffness effect and possible semi-rigid connection behaviour at the supports. Structural verification determined the required strength of the critical members to compare this with the estimated strengths, showing a correct safety level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber is in line with findings by other authors.
“Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber, is in line with findings by other authors; the most common singularities affecting recovered timber being holes and damage [13], together with warp and fissures [23].”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The most common singularities affecting recovered timber are holes and damage, together with warp and fissures.
“Warp, wanes and fissures rejection in recovered timber, is in line with findings by other authors; the most common singularities affecting recovered timber being holes and damage [13], together with warp and fissures [23].”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Most of these VSG standards tend to downgrade recovered timber.
“most of these VSG stan dards tend to downgrade recovered timber [20 -23].”
From Grading of recovered Norway spruce (Picea abies) timber for structural purposes (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Arriaga, F., Osuna-Sequera, C., Esteban, M., Íñiguez-González, G., & Bobadilla, I.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Arriaga, Francisco
- Venue
- Construction and Building Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-10
- Volume
- 304
- Pages
- 124466
- ISSN
- 0950-0618 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198756816
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 0.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Construction and Building Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (OTT- VAGI19FAM)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Wood Treatment and Properties
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
- Keywords
- timber structures, historic buildings, 18th-century buildings, wood flooring, non-destructive testing, elastic modulus, wood density, flexural strength, compressive strength, bending stiffness, structure confirmation, structural safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review