Cited by 5

Shear performance of fibre-reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete–fibre hybridization and synergy effects

Mashayekhi, Amirhesam, Hassanli, Reza, Zhuge, Yan, Ma, Xing, Chow, Christopher W.K., Bazli, Milad, Manalo, Allan·2025·Construction and Building Materials

Abstract

The shear performance of fiber-reinforced seawater sea-sand concrete (FR-SWSSC), a potential sustainable alternative to traditional concrete, requires comprehensive analysis of its shear behaviour to facilitate its integration into structural design practices. This study investigated the synergistic effects of fiber hybridization on the shear performance of SWSSC. Micro-fibers—basalt fibers (BF), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and short polypropylene (PPS)—and macro-fibers—twisted polypropylene (TPPL) and long polypropylene (PPL)—were utilized to explore the combined influence of fiber size and type. A modified shear test method, supported by experimental analysis and finite element modeling , was developed for improved accuracy. The results demonstrated a positive synergistic effect of PVA-based hybrids over mono-fibers. The PPL/PVA hybrid increased shear strength by 28 % and 23 % and shear toughness by 159 % and 46 % compared to mono PVA and PPL fibers, respectively. The high chemical bonding strength of PVA fibers improved concrete interlocking and reinforced the bonding of macro-fibers, contributing to this positive synergy. The TPPL/PVA hybrid also enhanced shear performance compared to plain SWSSC, which demonstrated the highest shear enhancement in this study. Moreover, the PVA/BF hybrid increased shear strength by 14 %–24 % and 6 %–16 % compared to mono PVA and BF fibers, respectively. These findings highlight fiber hybridization as a viable approach to improving the shear…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140955

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Mashayekhi, A., Hassanli, R., Zhuge, Y., Ma, X., Chow, C. W. K., Bazli, M., & Manalo, A.
Venue
Construction and Building Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-04
Volume
472
Pages
140955
ISSN
0950-0618
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en
Funders
University of South Australia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review