The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
(1994) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 10,542
DESCARTES' ERROR: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain
Marg, E. (1995) · Optometry and Vision Science · doi:10.1002/j.1538-9235.1995.tb03988.x · Cited by 8,118
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779
Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.
Squire, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.2.195 · Cited by 5,376
(2016) · Interpersonal Communication · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,693
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,674
(1996) · Cited by 3,692
(1988) · Cited by 3,656
Implicit memory: History and current status.
Schacter, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.3.501 · Cited by 2,983 · cited 1×
“Studies on neurological patient populations and health subjects suggest that a typical learning situation results in the formation of two distinct mental representations, one explicit and one implicit (e.g., Milner, Corkin, & Teuber, 1968; Schacter, 1987).”
Background
Cited by
A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019749 · Cited by 907
Self-citationMasters, R., & Maxwell, J. (2008) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/17509840802287218 · Cited by 663
The reticular-activating hypofrontality (RAH) model of acute exercise
Dietrich, A., & Audiffren, M. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.001 · Cited by 365
Self-citationJacobs, A. M. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186 · Cited by 323
Alexander, R., Aragón, O. R., Bookwala, J., Cherbuin, N., Gatt, J. M., Kahrilas, I. J., Kästner, N., Lawrence, A., Lowe, L., Morrison, R. G., et al. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.002 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Dietrich, A.
- Venue
- Consciousness and Cognition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 746-761
- ISSN
- 1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084770891
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 68
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.002
- The paper
- Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow. Consciousness and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.07.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.