Machine learning model-based design and model predictive control of a bioreactor for the improved production of mammalian cell-based bio-therapeutics
Abstract
This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R 2 and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent work on machine learning supported model predictive control illustrates how hybrid frameworks can improve bioreactor operation and real time optimization in mammalian cell processes.
“Recent work on machine learning supported model predictive control further illustrates how hybrid frameworks can improve bioreactor operation and real time optimization in mammalian cell processes [13].”
From Mechanistic model for HEK293 viral vector processes and its application in a digital shadow framework (2026) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Bioreactor monitoring with spectroscopy and chemometrics: a review
Lourenço, N. D., Lopes, J. A., Almeida, C. F., Sarraguça, M. C., & Pinheiro, H. M. (2012) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-012-6073-9 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
Bioprocess Control: Current Progress and Future Perspectives
Rathore, A. S., Mishra, S., Nikita, S., & Priyanka, P. (2021) · Life · doi:10.3390/life11060557 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
mAb Production Modeling and Design Space Evaluation Including Glycosylation Process
Yang, O., & Ierapetritou, M. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9020324 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kuchemüller, K. B., Austerjost, J., Machleid, R., Roßkamp, A., Niemann, J., & McCready, C. (2026) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-026-03362-2
- Authors
- Dan, A., Liu, B., Patil, U., Manuraj, B. N. M., Gandhi, R., Buchel, J., Chundawat, S. P. S., Guo, W., & Ramachandran, R.
- ORCID
- Ramachandran, Rohit
- Venue
- Control Engineering Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 156
- Pages
- 106198
- ISSN
- 0967-0661
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
- Licence
- Funders
- Rutgers The State University of New Jersey Research Council
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review