Cited by 19

Machine learning model-based design and model predictive control of a bioreactor for the improved production of mammalian cell-based bio-therapeutics

Dan, Ashley, Liu, Bochi, Patil, Urjit, Manuraj, Bhavani Nandhini Mummidi, Gandhi, Ronit, Buchel, Justin, Chundawat, Shishir P.S., Guo, Weihong +1 more·2025·Control Engineering Practice

Abstract

This study is concerned with the development of reduced order machine learning (ML) and non-ML model representations of experimental and simulated bioprocesses and their implementation in model predictive control (MPC) strategies to quantify performance accuracy and computational efficiency compared with the original models. Results showed that ML models such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) outperformed other reduced order models such as Kriging, Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) and Random Forest (RF) in terms of performance metrics such as R 2 and RMSE for both experimental and simulated data. Experimental data were obtained from a fed-batch and perfusion-based bioprocess and an LSTM model was developed and implemented in an MPC open-loop optimal control strategy to determine optimal input trajectories to maximize key performance metrics such as product titer. For the 2 by 3 ODE simulation, results showed that an autoregressive ANN was the most accurate in terms of replicating the plant model dynamics under MPC conditions followed by the LSTM and transfer function (TF) representations, with the feedforward ANN not being able to fully capture the salient dynamics. For the 4 by 5 ODE simulation, the TF representation outperformed the feedforward ANN model which in turn was more accurate than the LSTM model. In terms of computational time, the plant model simulation time for an MPC solution is intractable for larger input-output s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conengprac.2024.106198

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent work on machine learning supported model predictive control illustrates how hybrid frameworks can improve bioreactor operation and real time optimization in mammalian cell processes.

    “Recent work on machine learning supported model predictive control further illustrates how hybrid frameworks can improve bioreactor operation and real time optimization in mammalian cell processes [13].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dan, A., Liu, B., Patil, U., Manuraj, B. N. M., Gandhi, R., Buchel, J., Chundawat, S. P. S., Guo, W., & Ramachandran, R.
Venue
Control Engineering Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-03
Volume
156
Pages
106198
ISSN
0967-0661
Cited by
19
References
3
Language
en
Funders
Rutgers The State University of New Jersey Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review