The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006
Open accessAbstract
Background The incidence of unintended pregnancy is among the most essential health status indicators in the field of reproductive health. One ongoing goal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is to reduce unintended pregnancy, but the national rate has not been estimated since 2001. Study Design We combined data on women’s pregnancy intentions from the 2006—08 and 2002 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) with a 2008 national survey of abortion patients, data on births from the National Center for Health Statistics, induced abortions from a national abortion provider census, miscarriages estimated from the NSFG, and population data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results Nearly half (49%) of pregnancies were unintended in 2006, up slightly from 2001 (48%). The unintended pregnancy rate increased to 52 per 1,000 women aged 15—44 years old in 2006, from 50 in 2001. Disparities in unintended pregnancy rates among subgroups persisted, and women who were 18—24 years old, poor, or cohabiting had rates two to three times that of the national rate. The unintended pregnancy rate declined notably for teens 15—17 years old. The proportion of unintended pregnancies ending in abortion decreased from 47% in 2001 to 43% in 2006, and the unintended birth rate increased from 23 to 25 per 1,000 women 15—44 years old. Conclusions Since 2001, the U.S. has not made progress reducing unintended pregnancy. Rates increased for nearly all groups and remain high overall. Efforts to help women and couples plan their pregnancies, such as increasing access to effective contraceptives, should target groups at greatest risk of unintended pregnancy, particularly poor and cohabiting women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes.
Singh, S., Sedgh, G., & Hussain, R. (2010) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2010.00250.x · Cited by 731
Cited by
Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011
Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa1506575 · Cited by 1,989
Self-citationDeSisto, C. L., Kim, S. Y., & Sharma, A. J. (2014) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd11.130415 · Cited by 577
Ott, M. A., Sucato, G. S., COMMITTEE ON ADOLESCENCE, Braverman, P. K., Adelman, W. P., Alderman, E. M., Breuner, C. C., Levine, D. A., Marcell, A. V., & O’Brien, R. F. (2014) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2014-2300 · Cited by 402
Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009
Finer, L. B., Jerman, J., & Kavanaugh, M. L. (2012) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.027 · Cited by 308
Self-citationCleland, K., Zhu, H., Goldstuck, N., Cheng, L., & Trussell, J. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des140 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R.
- Venue
- Contraception
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 478-485
- ISSN
- 0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108735651
- Cited by
- 1,291
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 142.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
- The paper
- Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2011). Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.