Cited by 11Reproductive Health and ContraceptionInternational Human Rights and Reproductive LawMale Reproductive Health Studies

Research gaps identified during the 2014 update of the WHO medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use and selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use

Open access
Dragoman, Monica V., Jatlaoui, Tara, Nanda, Kavita, Curtis, Kathryn M., Gaffield, Mary E.·2016·Contraception

Abstract

Universal access to safe and effective contraception is an important public health goal. Family planning and prevention of unintended pregnancy are essential to securing the well-being and autonomy of individuals, while supporting the health and development of communities [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) recently undertook a process to update its global guidance on “who” can use contraception safely and “how” to use contraception safely and effectively to generate the fifth edition of the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (MEC) and the third edition of the WHO Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (SPR).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.009

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mechanism of GnRH antagonists differs from that of GnRH agonists, which after a first phase of stimulation desensitize GnRH receptors, leading to full suppression of LH and FSH production and complete suppression of E2 to levels similar to those after bilateral oophorectomy.

    “The mechanism is different from that of the GnRH agonist which, after a first phase of stimulation, desensitizes GnRH receptors, leading to full suppression of LH and FSH production and subsequently to complete suppression of E2 to levels similar to those observed after bilateral oophorectomy [95,96,97,98].”
  • GnRH agonists cannot titrate E2 levels.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • GnRH agonists have unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms are used.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • GnRH agonists have a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”
  • GnRH agonists excessively suppress E2 to less than 20 pg/mL, with related unfavorable side effects.

    “GnRH agonists are effective at treating endometriosis symptoms, but they have numerous limitations, including a delayed therapeutic impact because of the flare-up effect, excessive suppression of E2 to less than 20 pg/mL (with related unfavorable side effects), inability to titrate E2 levels, and unpredictable reversibility of treatment when injectable depot forms of GnRH agonists are used [95,96,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dragoman, M. V., Jatlaoui, T., Nanda, K., Curtis, K. M., & Gaffield, M. E.
Affiliations
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Family Health International 360 (US)
Corresponding author
Dragoman, Monica V.
Venue
Contraception
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
94
Issue
3
Pages
195-201
ISSN
0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2215984847
Cited by
11
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contraception (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
Keywords
contraceptive use, research gaps, family planning, unintended pregnancy prevention, contraceptive safety, contraceptive effectiveness
MeSH terms
Contraception, Contraception Behavior, Eligibility Determination, Female, Humans, Male, Research, World Health Organization, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review