Evaluation of the effect of a new oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on hemostasis parameters
Open accessAbstract
Objective To assess the effect on hemostasis parameters of a new combined oral contraceptive (COC).Study design In this randomized, single centre, open-label, exploratory study, healthy women received either 15 mg estetrol/3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP) (n = 39), 30 mcg ethinylestradiol/150 mcg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) (n = 30), or 20 mcg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (n = 32) for six 28-day cycles. Blood was collected at baseline, cycle 3, and cycle 6. Median change from baseline was evaluated for procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic parameters, and for sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).Results Median change of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) based activated protein C sensitivity resistance (APCr) at cycle 6 was +30% for E4/DRSP, +165% for EE/LNG (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), and +219% for EE/DRSP (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP). Changes to prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and SHBG for E4/DRSP, EE/LNG, and EE/DRSP were +23%, +71%, and +64% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP); and +55%, +74% and +251% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), respectively. At cycle 6, changes to other hemostasis parameters for E4/DRSP were similar or smaller than for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP.Conclusions In this study, changes in hemostasis parameters after treatment with 6 cycles of E4/DRSP were smaller or similar to those observed for EE/LNG. Similar, but more pronounced changes were also observed versus EE/DRSP, which supports the hypothesis that the effect of COCs on hemostasis parameters is mainly mediated by the estrogenic component. Further studies are needed to provide more insight into the venous thromboembolic risk of E4/DRSP.Implications statement This study reports that the effects on hemostasis parameters of a COC containing 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP are less or similar to those for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. It also demonstrates that the choice of estrogen modulates the effects of COCs on hemostasis parameters.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The lower estrogenic effect of E4/DRSP was also reflected by the low impact of E4/DRSP on hemostatic activation.
“The lower estrogenic effect of E4/DRSP was also reflected by the low impact of E4/DRSP on hemostatic activation [ 15 , 16 , 21 ].”
From Endocrine and metabolic effects of an oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 120
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Heinemann K, Franke C, Moehner S, Do Minh T, Dinger J. Cardiovascular safety in users of different combined oral contraceptives -Final results from the INAS-SCORE study. Abstract FC-03. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2018;23:40.
- Klipping C, Duijkers I, Parke S, Mellinger U, Serrani M, Junge W. Hemostatic effects of a novel estradiol-based oral contraceptive: an open-label, randomized, crossover study of estradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. Drugs R D 2011;11:159-70.
- Duijkers IJ, Klipping C, Zimmerman Y, et al. Inhibition of ovulation by administration of estetrol in combination with drospirenone or levonorgestrel: results of a phase II dose-finding pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015;20:476-89.
- Authors
- Douxfils, J., Klipping, C., Duijkers, I., Kinet, V., Mawet, M., Maillard, C., Jost, M., Rosing, J., & Foidart, J.-M.
- Affiliations
- University of Namur (BE)
- Mithra Pharmaceuticals (Belgium) (BE)
- Maastricht University (NL)
- University of Liège (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Jost, Maud
- Venue
- Contraception
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 396-402
- ISSN
- 0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3087247063
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 8.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orbi.uliege.be
- Licence
- Locations
- Contraception (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Estetra SPRL, an affiliate's company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- estetrol, drospirenone, combined oral contraceptives, hemostasis, endogenous thrombin potential, activated protein C resistance, prothrombin fragment 1+2, sex hormone-binding globulin, ethinyl estradiol, levonorgestrel, venous thromboembolism risk, estrogenic effects
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Androstenes, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Estetrol, Estrogens, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Hemostasis, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Activated Protein C Resistance, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review