Cited by 120Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsReproductive Health and ContraceptionVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Evaluation of the effect of a new oral contraceptive containing estetrol and drospirenone on hemostasis parameters

Open access
Douxfils, Jonathan, Klipping, Christine, Duijkers, Ingrid, Kinet, Virginie, Mawet, Marie, Maillard, Catherine, Jost, Maud, Rosing, Jan +1 more·2020·Contraception

Abstract

Objective To assess the effect on hemostasis parameters of a new combined oral contraceptive (COC).Study design In this randomized, single centre, open-label, exploratory study, healthy women received either 15 mg estetrol/3 mg drospirenone (E4/DRSP) (n = 39), 30 mcg ethinylestradiol/150 mcg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG) (n = 30), or 20 mcg ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone (EE/DRSP) (n = 32) for six 28-day cycles. Blood was collected at baseline, cycle 3, and cycle 6. Median change from baseline was evaluated for procoagulant, anticoagulant, and fibrinolytic parameters, and for sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).Results Median change of endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) based activated protein C sensitivity resistance (APCr) at cycle 6 was +30% for E4/DRSP, +165% for EE/LNG (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), and +219% for EE/DRSP (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP). Changes to prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and SHBG for E4/DRSP, EE/LNG, and EE/DRSP were +23%, +71%, and +64% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP); and +55%, +74% and +251% (p-value <0.05 vs E4/DRSP), respectively. At cycle 6, changes to other hemostasis parameters for E4/DRSP were similar or smaller than for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP.Conclusions In this study, changes in hemostasis parameters after treatment with 6 cycles of E4/DRSP were smaller or similar to those observed for EE/LNG. Similar, but more pronounced changes were also observed versus EE/DRSP, which supports the hypothesis that the effect of COCs on hemostasis parameters is mainly mediated by the estrogenic component. Further studies are needed to provide more insight into the venous thromboembolic risk of E4/DRSP.Implications statement This study reports that the effects on hemostasis parameters of a COC containing 15 mg E4/3 mg DRSP are less or similar to those for EE/LNG or EE/DRSP. It also demonstrates that the choice of estrogen modulates the effects of COCs on hemostasis parameters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.08.015

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 120

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Heinemann K, Franke C, Moehner S, Do Minh T, Dinger J. Cardiovascular safety in users of different combined oral contraceptives -Final results from the INAS-SCORE study. Abstract FC-03. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2018;23:40.
  2. Klipping C, Duijkers I, Parke S, Mellinger U, Serrani M, Junge W. Hemostatic effects of a novel estradiol-based oral contraceptive: an open-label, randomized, crossover study of estradiol valerate/dienogest versus ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel. Drugs R D 2011;11:159-70.
  3. Duijkers IJ, Klipping C, Zimmerman Y, et al. Inhibition of ovulation by administration of estetrol in combination with drospirenone or levonorgestrel: results of a phase II dose-finding pilot study. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015;20:476-89.

Authors
Douxfils, J., Klipping, C., Duijkers, I., Kinet, V., Mawet, M., Maillard, C., Jost, M., Rosing, J., & Foidart, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • University of Namur (BE)
  • Mithra Pharmaceuticals (Belgium) (BE)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Jost, Maud
Venue
Contraception
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
102
Issue
6
Pages
396-402
ISSN
0010-7824 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087247063
Cited by
120
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contraception (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of the University of Namur (submittedVersion)
Funders
Estetra SPRL, an affiliate's company of Mithra Pharmaceuticals
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
estetrol, drospirenone, combined oral contraceptives, hemostasis, endogenous thrombin potential, activated protein C resistance, prothrombin fragment 1+2, sex hormone-binding globulin, ethinyl estradiol, levonorgestrel, venous thromboembolism risk, estrogenic effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Androstenes, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Estetrol, Estrogens, Ethinyl Estradiol, Female, Hemostasis, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Activated Protein C Resistance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review