Cited by 322Fungal and yeast genetics researchGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Glycosylation engineering in yeast: the advent of fully humanized yeast

Hamilton, Stephen R, Gerngross, Tillman U·2007·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Yeasts have been extensively used as model organisms to elucidate cellular processes and their mechanism in lower eukaryotes. Consequently, a large number of powerful genetic tools have been developed to engineer yeast and improve its utility. These tools and the development of efficient large-scale fermentation processes have made recombinant protein expression in yeast an attractive choice. However, for the production of glycoproteins for human use, native high-mannose yeast glycosylation is not suitable and therefore represents a major limitation for yeast based protein expression systems. Over the last two decades several groups have attempted to overcome this problem, yet with limited success. Recently however, major advances in the glycoengineering of the yeast Pichia pastoris, have culminated in the production of fully humanized sialylated glycoproteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.09.001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A Pichia pastoris yeast strain was engineered to generate human-like glycans but devoid of core-fucose.

    “For example, a Pichia pastoris yeast strain was engineered to generate human-like glycans but devoid of core-fucose (Choi et al., 2003;Hamilton et al., 2006;Hamilton and Gerngross 2007).”

    From Therapeutic glycoprotein production in mammalian cells (2017) · cites this paper as Hamilton and Gerngross 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamilton, S. R., & Gerngross, T. U.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Gerngross, Tillman U
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-10
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
387-392
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000702379
Cited by
322
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 28
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
glycosylation engineering, humanized yeast, Pichia pastoris, recombinant protein expression, sialylated glycoproteins, high-mannose glycosylation, glycoengineering, large-scale fermentation
MeSH terms
Animals, Glycoproteins, Glycosylation, Humans, Pichia, Recombinant Proteins, Transfection, Protein Engineering, Genetic Enhancement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review