Cited by 269Biofuel production and bioconversionEnzyme Production and CharacterizationAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Extremely thermophilic microorganisms for biomass conversion: status and prospects

Blumer-Schuette, Sara E, Kataeva, Irina, Westpheling, Janet, Adams, Michael WW, Kelly, Robert M·2008·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Many microorganisms that grow at elevated temperatures are able to utilize a variety of carbohydrates pertinent to the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to bioenergy. The range of substrates utilized depends on growth temperature optimum and biotope. Hyperthermophilic marine archaea (T(opt)>or=80 degrees C) utilize alpha- and beta-linked glucans, such as starch, barley glucan, laminarin, and chitin, while hyperthermophilic marine bacteria (T(opt)>or=80 degrees C) utilize the same glucans as well as hemicellulose, such as xylans and mannans. However, none of these organisms are able to efficiently utilize crystalline cellulose. Among the thermophiles, this ability is limited to a few terrestrial bacteria with upper temperature limits for growth near 75 degrees C. Deconstruction of crystalline cellulose by these extreme thermophiles is achieved by 'free' primary cellulases, which are distinct from those typically associated with large multi-enzyme complexes known as cellulosomes. These primary cellulases also differ from the endoglucanases (referred to here as 'secondary cellulases') reported from marine hyperthermophiles that show only weak activity toward cellulose. Many extremely thermophilic enzymes implicated in the deconstruction of lignocellulose can be identified in genome sequences, and many more promising biocatalysts probably remain annotated as 'hypothetical proteins'. Characterization of these enzymes will require intensive effort but is likely to generate new opportunities for the use of renewable resources as biofuels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.04.007

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blumer-Schuette, S. E., Kataeva, I., Westpheling, J., Adams, M. W., & Kelly, R. M.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Robert M
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
210-217
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143926699
Cited by
269
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 30
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • Office of Science
  • Biological and Environmental Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Enzyme Production and Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
lignocellulosic biomass conversion, hyperthermophilic archaea, hyperthermophilic bacteria, endoglucanase, cellulosome, glucan, hemicellulose, biofuels, biocatalysts, carbohydrate utilization
MeSH terms
Archaea, Bacteria, Bioelectric Energy Sources, Biotechnology, Cellulase, Cellulose, Energy-Generating Resources, Hot Temperature, Marine Biology, Phylogeny, Biomass, Carbohydrate Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review