Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 616

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels

Open access
Lee, Sung Kuk, Chou, Howard, Ham, Timothy S, Lee, Taek Soon, Keasling, Jay D·2008·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.014

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 616

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S. K., Chou, H., Ham, T. S., Lee, T. S., & Keasling, J. D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
556-563
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118764014
Cited by
616
References
62
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.014
The paper
Lee, S. K., Chou, H., Ham, T. S., Lee, T. S., & Keasling, J. D. (2008). Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuels production: from bugs to synthetic biology to fuels. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2008.10.014

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.