Cited by 62Biofuel production and bioconversionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production

Exploration of Natural Biomass Utilization Systems (NBUS) for advanced biofuel—From systems biology to synthetic design

Xie, Shangxian, Syrenne, Ryan, Sun, Su, Yuan, Joshua S·2014·Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Abstract

Efficient degradation and utilization of lignocellulosic biomass remains a challenge for sustainable and affordable biofuels. Various natural biomass utilization systems (NBUS) evolved the capacity to combat the recalcitrance of plant cell walls. The study of these NBUS could enable the development of efficient and cost-effective biocatalysts, microorganisms, and bioprocesses for biofuels and bioproducts. Here, we reviewed the recent research progresses for several NBUS, ranging from single cell microorganisms to consortiums such as cattle rumen and insect guts. These studies aided the discovery of biomass-degrading enzymes and the elucidation of the evolutionary and functional relevance in these systems. In particular, advances in the next generation 'omics' technologies offered new opportunities to explore NBUS in a high-throughput manner. Systems biology helped to facilitate the rapid biocatalyst discovery and detailed mechanism analysis, which could in turn guide the reverse design of engineered microorganisms and bioprocesses for cost-effective and efficient biomass conversion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology provide rich tools for microbial community research.

    “The genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology also provide rich tools for microbial community research [85].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 72 · Cited by 62

Authors
Xie, S., Syrenne, R., Sun, S., & Yuan, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • Texas A&M University System (US)
Corresponding author
Yuan, Joshua S
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-06
Volume
27
Pages
195-203
ISSN
0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986576915
Cited by
62
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
DOE EERE BETO grant
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Keywords
lignocellulosic biomass, biofuel production, biomass-degrading enzymes, rumen microbiota, insect gut microbiota, microbial consortia, biocatalyst discovery, systems biology, synthetic biology, engineered microorganisms, biomass conversion, omics technologies
MeSH terms
Animals, Bacteria, Cell Wall, Digestive System, Fungi, Lignin, Ruminants, Biomass, Computational Biology, Isoptera, Systems Biology, Biofuels, Plant Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review