Exploration of Natural Biomass Utilization Systems (NBUS) for advanced biofuel—From systems biology to synthetic design
Abstract
Efficient degradation and utilization of lignocellulosic biomass remains a challenge for sustainable and affordable biofuels. Various natural biomass utilization systems (NBUS) evolved the capacity to combat the recalcitrance of plant cell walls. The study of these NBUS could enable the development of efficient and cost-effective biocatalysts, microorganisms, and bioprocesses for biofuels and bioproducts. Here, we reviewed the recent research progresses for several NBUS, ranging from single cell microorganisms to consortiums such as cattle rumen and insect guts. These studies aided the discovery of biomass-degrading enzymes and the elucidation of the evolutionary and functional relevance in these systems. In particular, advances in the next generation 'omics' technologies offered new opportunities to explore NBUS in a high-throughput manner. Systems biology helped to facilitate the rapid biocatalyst discovery and detailed mechanism analysis, which could in turn guide the reverse design of engineered microorganisms and bioprocesses for cost-effective and efficient biomass conversion.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology provide rich tools for microbial community research.
“The genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology also provide rich tools for microbial community research [85].”
From Recent Developments in Lignocellulosic Biofuels, a Renewable Source of Bioenergy (2022) · cites this paper as [85]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- Xie, S., Syrenne, R., Sun, S., & Yuan, J. S.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yuan, Joshua S
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-06
- Volume
- 27
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986576915
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- DOE EERE BETO grant
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Keywords
- lignocellulosic biomass, biofuel production, biomass-degrading enzymes, rumen microbiota, insect gut microbiota, microbial consortia, biocatalyst discovery, systems biology, synthetic biology, engineered microorganisms, biomass conversion, omics technologies
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteria, Cell Wall, Digestive System, Fungi, Lignin, Ruminants, Biomass, Computational Biology, Isoptera, Systems Biology, Biofuels, Plant Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review