Recent Developments in Lignocellulosic Biofuels, a Renewable Source of Bioenergy
Open accessAbstract
Biofuel consists of non-fossil fuel derived from the organic biomass of renewable resources, including plants, animals, microorganisms, and waste. Energy derived from biofuel is known as bioenergy. The reserve of fossil fuels is now limited and continuing to decrease, while at the same time demand for energy is increasing. In order to overcome this scarcity, it is vital for human beings to transfer their dependency on fossil fuels to alternative types of fuel, including biofuels, which are effective methods of fulfilling present and future demands. The current review therefore focusses on second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels obtained from non-edible plant biomass (i.e., cellulose, lignin, hemi-celluloses, non-food material) in a more sustainable manner. The conversion of lignocellulosic feedstock is an important step during biofuel production. It is, however, important to note that, as a result of various technical restrictions, biofuel production is not presently cost efficient, thus leading to the need for improvement in the methods employed. There remain a number of challenges for the process of biofuel production, including cost effectiveness and the limitations of various technologies employed. This leads to a vital need for ongoing and enhanced research and development, to ensure market level availability of lignocellulosic biofuel.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review summarizes second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels from non-edible plant biomass, covering feedstocks, pretreatment, biochemical and thermochemical conversion, and emerging enhancement approaches. It concludes that lignocellulosic biofuels are promising sustainable alternatives but remain limited by cost, technology, and R&D funding barriers.
Key findings
- Second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels are derived from non-edible biomass such as cellulose, lignin, and hemicelluloses; examples include cellulosic ethanol and Fischer-Tropsch fuels, and such fuels are described as carbon neutral or negative for CO₂.
- Lignocellulosic biomass synthesized by photosynthesis exceeds 100 billion tons annually; collectable/utilizable amounts are estimated at around 1.3 billion tons/year in the United States and about 800 million tons in China, while cellulose and hemicelluloses make up about two thirds of plant dry mass.
- Reported process conditions include dilute sulfuric acid pretreatment leading to 89.5% hemicellulose solubilization; biochemical route temperatures of 60–220 °C for pretreatment, about 50 °C for enzymatic hydrolysis, and 20–60 °C for fermentation; pyrolysis at 300–1000 °C, liquefaction at 250–370 °C, and gasification at 900–1200 °C.
- Major challenges are production cost and economic feasibility compared with crude oil, technology limitations, and the need for funding and ongoing R&D; proposed improvements include advanced biorefineries, synthetic and systems biology, microbial community approaches, metabolic engineering, nanotechnology, and integrated approaches.
Methods
- Narrative review of second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels; no experimental design, sample, or primary data collection is reported.
- Synthesizes literature on feedstocks, pretreatment, biochemical and thermochemical conversion routes, and enhancement strategies, with figures adapted from Naik et al. and Dragone et al.
- Main analysis is qualitative discussion of cited studies and reported process conditions; no systematic review protocol or meta-analysis is stated.
Limitations
- Stated: current production of second-generation biofuels is not yet cost effective due to technical restrictions; challenges include high production cost, technology limitations, and funding for continuous R&D.
- Stated: higher-generation biofuels are not price competitive because of production costs and technology limitations (citing Mizik et al.).
- Evident: as a narrative review, it lacks systematic search/inclusion criteria and quantitative synthesis; the text also contains duplicated passages and typographical errors.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 58 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Petroleum products have a limited reserve stock.
“In addition, petroleum products have a limited reserve stock, leading to increased global attention being focused on studies of biomass based energy (i.e., biofuels) [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology provide rich tools for microbial community research.
“The genome, metabolome, flux group, and computational simulation techniques of systems biology and synthetic biology also provide rich tools for microbial community research [85].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] Xie, 2014, Exploration of Natural Biomass Utilization Systems (NBUS) for advanced biofuel—From systems biology to synthetic design, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Before enzymatic hydrolysis, pretreatment of cellulosic and related feedstocks is a highly decisive step, which can be physical, chemical, or biological.
“It should be noted that, before the enzymatic hydrolysis, pre-treatment of the cellulosic and related feedstocks is a highly decisive step, which can be undertaken in either a physical manner, or chemically or biologically [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Yang, 2008, Pre-treatment: The key to unlocking low cost cellulosic ethanol, Biofuel Bioprod. Biorefin. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is considerable use of plant biomass in liquid biofuel production because plant biomass comprises cell walls composed largely of polysaccharides.
“There is considerable use of plant biomass in liquid biofuel production, due to these comprising cell walls composed largely of polysaccharides [13,40,41].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [13] Naik, 2010, Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Badawy, 2021, Selection of second-generation crop for biodiesel extraction and testing its impact with nano additives on diesel engine performance and emissions, Energy source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [41] Pauly, 2008, Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels, Plant J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pretreatment of raw material is an important step during biofuel production.
“Pretreatment of raw material is an important step during biofuel production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2,[48][49][50][51][52][54][55][56][57][58][59][60]
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Cell walls of plants obstruct cellulosic biofuel production due to their morphological characteristics.
- Premisecitation
Pyrolysis products are synthesis gas (CO, CO2, CH4, H2, etc.), bio-oil, and bio-char.
“The pyrolysis products are synthesis gas (CO, CO 2 , CH 4 , and H 2 , etc.), bio-oil, and bio-char.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Roy, 2017, Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Demand for fossil fuel based petroleum products continues to increase.
“The development of renewable energy from biomass, solar, wind, water, and nuclear energy has now become an urgent issue as a result of the continued increase in demand for fossil fuel based petroleum products, along with their established role in global warming and climate change [1,6].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A change in the composition of cell walls may improve biofuel production.
“A change in the composition of cell walls may improve biofuel production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Sharma, 2020, Sustainable environmental management and related biofuel technologies, J. Environ. Manag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [79] Furtado, 2014, Modifying plants for biofuel and biomaterial production, Plant Biotechnol. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [80] Kalluri, 2014, Systems and synthetic biology approaches to alter plant cell walls and reduce biomass recalcitrance, Plant Biotechnol. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Metagenomic, transcriptome, and metagenomics technologies can skip microbial pure-breeding and directly read genome, transcriptome, and proteome information of the microbial community in the original environment to identify cellulase genes.
“The metagenomic, transcriptome, and metagenomics technologies developed in recent years can skip microbial pure-breeding and directly read the genome, transcriptome, and proteome information of the microbial community in the original environment to identify cellulase genes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [81] Streit, 2017, Screening for cellulase encoding clones in metagenomic libraries, Metagenomics. Methods in Molecular Biology source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [82] Liu, 2013, Development of highly efficient, low-cost lignocellulolytic enzyme systems in the post-genomic era, Biotechnol. Adv. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Plant biomass is a widely and easily available biological resource for raw materials for fuel.
“Plant biomass is a widely and easily available biological resource for the raw materials for fuel [13,36,39,40].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [13] Naik, 2010, Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [36] Zabaniotou, 2008, Rapeseed residues utilization for energy and 2nd generation biofuels, Fuel source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [39] Arefin, 2021, A review of biofuel production from floating aquatic plants: An emerging source of bio-renewable energy, Biofuel. Bioprod. Biorefin. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [40] Badawy, 2021, Selection of second-generation crop for biodiesel extraction and testing its impact with nano additives on diesel engine performance and emissions, Energy source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Physical and chemical pretreatment is widely used during biofuel production to improve quality of the substrate for further digestion.
“Physical and chemical pretreatment is widely used during biofuel production to improve quality of the substrate to be used for further digestion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Wagner, A.O., Lackner, N., Mutschlechner, M., Prem, E.M., Markt, R., and Illmer, P. (2018). Biological pretreatment strategies for second-generation lignocellulosic resources to enhance biogas production. Energies, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Second-generation biofuels are either carbon neutral or negative with respect to CO2 concentration.
“Such fuels are either carbon neutral or negative when it comes to CO 2 concentration [13,[32][33][34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13,[32][33][34]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Biological pretreatment is mainly used for breaking lignin coatings and disrupting the cellulose structure so that it is more susceptible to enzymatic or microbial digestion.
“Biological pretreatment is mainly used for breaking lignin coatings and disrupting the cellulose structure so that it would be more susceptible for enzymatic or microbial digestion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Wagner, A.O., Lackner, N., Mutschlechner, M., Prem, E.M., Markt, R., and Illmer, P. (2018). Biological pretreatment strategies for second-generation lignocellulosic resources to enhance biogas production. Energies, 11. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Improvement in biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass may be achieved through modern approaches of molecular biology, synthetic biology, and systems biology to improve plant cell wall digestibility.
“This may lead to improvement in biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass through the employment of modern approaches of molecular biology, along with synthetic and systemic biology, to improve plant cell wall digestibility [31,79,80].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] Sharma, 2020, Sustainable environmental management and related biofuel technologies, J. Environ. Manag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [79] Furtado, 2014, Modifying plants for biofuel and biomaterial production, Plant Biotechnol. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [80] Kalluri, 2014, Systems and synthetic biology approaches to alter plant cell walls and reduce biomass recalcitrance, Plant Biotechnol. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The second major challenge is technology-based limitations that need to improve to achieve cost-effective and commercially suitable second-generation biofuels.
“The second major challenge is technology-based limitations, which need to improve in order to achieve cost effective and commercially suitable second-generation biofuels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Shahid, 2021, Biofuels and biorefineries: Development, application and future perspectives emphasizing the environmental and economic aspects, J. Environ. Manag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Raud, 2019, Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Advancement in new techniques is proving challenging, particularly in addressing cost barriers linked with biofuel production.
“The advancement in new techniques is proving a challenging task, in particular, when it comes to addressing the cost barriers linked with biofuel production [15,42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [15] Shahid, 2021, Biofuels and biorefineries: Development, application and future perspectives emphasizing the environmental and economic aspects, J. Environ. Manag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Raud, 2019, Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
New tools provided by synthetic biology could introduce a wide range of genetic diversity into a microbial host.
“Now, new tools provided by synthetic biology could introduce a wide range of genetic diversity into a microbial host.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60,[97][98][99][100]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Due to complexity of sugar utilization and stress resistance traits involving multiple levels of genes, proteins, regulatory factors, and stress behaviors, it is difficult to achieve the desired result through simple genetic or metabolic engineering.
“Due to the complexity of sugar utilization and stress resistance traits, which involve multiple levels of genes, proteins, regulatory factors, and stress behaviors, it is difficult to achieve the desired result through simple genetic or metabolic engineering [89].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Fu, 2016, Regulatory mechanisms related to biofuel tolerance in producing microbes, J. Appl. Microbiol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Nanotechnology and its nanomaterials have emerged as an effective solution for achieving cost-effective and efficient approaches to enhance biofuel production.
“Nanotechnology along with its nanomaterials have emerged as an effective solution for the biofuel field in achieving cost-effective and efficient approaches to enhance biofuel production [94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Nizami, 2018, Towards nanotechnology-based biofuel industry, Biofuel Res. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Using accurate computer simulations of complex metabolic networks, the ability to optimize growth or produce a product under specific conditions can be obtained with minimal changes and printing.
“Using accurate computer simulations of complex metabolic networks, the ability to optimize growth or produce a product under specific conditions can be obtained with minimal changes and printing [93].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [93] King, 2015, Next-generation genome-scale models for metabolic engineering, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Combined with breeding, higher throughput technology, and adaptive evolution, a series of genetic transformations can be completed to optimize biological process project objectives.
“Combined together with breeding, higher throughput technology, and adaptive evolution, a series of genetic transformations can be completed to optimize biological process project objectives [60,[97][98][99][100].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60,[97][98][99][100]
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 16
- May combine two claims. 22
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA comparison of biochemical and thermochemical conversion methods reveals differing yields in terms of feedstock, while demonstrating similarity in terms of energy.
“A comparison of both conversation methods reveals differing yields in terms of feedstock, while demonstrating a similarity in terms of energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationScreening microbial communities that degrade cellulose efficiently from nature, identifying their community structure, studying fermentation kinetics, analyzing the mechanism of their efficient degradation and transformation, and then simulating construction of similar systems or further strengthening their functions through transformation will provide new ideas for establishing a new cellulose降解
“At present, screening of microbial communities that degrade cellulose efficiently from nature, identifying their community structure, studying the fermentation kinetics, analyzing the mechanism of their efficient degradation and transformation, and then simulating the construction of similar systems or further strengthening their functions through transformation will provide us with new ideas for”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86][87][88]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe lignocellulosic biomass that can be collected and utilized in the United States during a year is around 1.3 billion tons, and China has about 800 million tons.
“It is estimated that the lignocellulosic biomass that can be collected and utilized in the United States during a year is around 1.3 billion tons, and China has about 800 million tons [47].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Shi, 2011, China’s resources of biomass feedstock, Eng. Sci.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSequencing techniques revealed a large variety of cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolysis related genes, enhancing understanding of cellulase richness.
“By employing sequencing techniques, it become evident that there are a large variety of cellulose, hemicellulose hydrolysis related genes, which further enhances people's understanding of the richness of cellulase [83,84].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [83] Nimchua, 2012, Metagenomic analysis of novel lignocellulose-degrading enzymes from higher termite guts inhabiting microbes, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [84] Rashamuse, 2017, Metagenomic mining of glycoside hydrolases from the hindgut bacterial symbionts of a termite (Trinervitermes trinervoides) and the characterization of a multimodular beta-1,4-xylanase (GH11), Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFeedstock for second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels primarily consists of forms of biomass unfit for human consumption, hence it does not compete with food production.
“Feedstock for second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels primarily consists of forms of biomass that are unfit for human consumption, hence, it does not compete with the production of food.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh temperature liquefaction is the biomass conversion into bio-oil at 250-370°C under conditions containing more moisture.
“High temperature liquefaction is the biomass conversion into bio-oil at 250-370 • C under conditions containing more moisture [75].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Li, 2016, Impact of feedstock quality and variation on biochemical and thermochemical conversion, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPyrolysis takes place at 300-1000°C under oxygen-free conditions.
“The pyrolysis takes place at 300-1000 • C under oxygen-free conditions [72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Roy, 2017, Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPotential raw materials for second-generation biofuels consist of crop residue biomass, non-food energy crops, Jatropha, wood residues, and bacteria.
“Potential raw materials for second-generation biofuels consist of: (1) crop residue biomass; (2) non-food energy crops; (3) Jatropha; (4) wood residues; and (5) bacteria [7,22,34,[43][44][45][46].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7,22,34,[43][44][45][46]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSecond-generation lignocellulosic biofuels are produced by employing non-edible biomass in a more sustainable manner than first-generation biofuel.
“Second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels are produced by employing non-edible biomass (e.g., cellulose, lignin, and hemi-celluloses) in a more sustainable manner rather than first-generation biofuel.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Non-edible lignocellulosic biomass is present abundantly in the natural ecosystem.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationGasification is the conversion of biomass to CO, CO2, H2O, H2, CH4, etc., at 900-1200°C, as well as the formation of by-products tar and coke.
“Gasification is the conversion of biomass to CO, CO 2 , H 2 O, H 2 , CH 4 , etc., at 900-1200 • C, as well as the formation of by-products tar and coke [76].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Richardson, 2012, A short overview on purification and conditioning of syngas produced by biomass gasification: Catalytic strategies, process intensification and new concepts, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiofuel production is not presently cost efficient due to technical restrictions, requiring improvement in the methods employed.
“It is, however, important to note that, as a result of various technical restrictions, biofuel production is not presently cost efficient, thus leading to the need for improvement in the methods employed.”
- Also stated in: § 3. Feedstock for Second-Generation Lignocellulosic Biofuels · plain
“It should be noted that the current production of such biofuels is not yet cost effective, due to various technical restrictions that require improvements in the methods employed [42].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Raud, 2019, Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § 3. Feedstock for Second-Generation Lignocellulosic Biofuels · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLipase producing or lipolytic bacteria are a future hope since lipases used in transesterification reaction lead to biodiesel production.
“Lipase producing or lipolytic bacteria are also our future hope since lipases used in the transesterification reaction further lead to biodiesel production [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Rai, 2019, Micrococcus luteus 2030: A novel lipolytic bacterial strain isolated from local contaminated soil in Saudi Arabia, Sylwan
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGrowing bioenergy crops on marginal land will lead to the production of sustainable biofuels.
“Growing bioenergy crops on marginal land will lead to the production of sustainable biofuels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationReaction conditions of biochemical methods are relatively mild: pretreatment temperature 60-220°C, enzyme hydrolysis temperature about 50°C, and fermentation temperature 20-60°C.
“Generally, the reaction conditions of biochemical methods are rela-tively mild where pretreatment temperature is 60-220 • C, enzyme hydrolysis temperature is about 50 • C, and fermentation temperature is 20-60 • C [61].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [61] Lynd, 2002, Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamental and Biotechnology, Microbiol. Mol. Bio. Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMicroorganisms and different enzymes are employed to convert cellulose and hemicellulose to sugars, followed by fermentation for ethanol production.
“Microorganisms and different enzymes are employed to convert various components of feedstocks (i.e., cellulose and hemicellulose) to sugars, followed by fermentation for ethanol production [27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Sims, 2010, An overview of second generation biofuel technologies, Bioresour. Technol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The major constituents of lignocellulosic feedstock consist of cellulose and hemicelluloses, about two thirds of the dry mass of plants.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe major rapid pyrolysis product is bio-oil, and bio-carbon is a major yield of slow pyrolysis.
“According to different conditions, the major rapid pyrolysis product is bio-oil, and bio-carbon is a major yield of slow pyrolysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Roy, 2017, Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe biofuel costs of both pathways are not fixed, and vary between companies, leading to the potential for an alternative process to benefit the industry.
“The biofuel costs of both pathways are not fixed, and vary between companies, thus leading to the potential for an alternative process to benefit the industry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOne major difference in biochemical and thermochemical methods is ethanol production in the biochemical method, while a range of higher hydrocarbons are synthesized by the thermochemical route.
“One major difference in biochemical and thermochemical methods is ethanol production in the biochemical method, while a range of higher hydrocarbons are synthesized by the thermochemical route (example: jet fuel).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningCountries around the world are stepping up efforts to develop conversion and utilization of lignocellulose to alleviate energy crises, environmental pollution, and sustainable development.
“Therefore, countries around the world are stepping up efforts to develop the conversion and utilization of lignocellulose, a renewable resource, to alleviate problems such as energy crises, environmental pollution, and sustainable development [48][49][50][51][52].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48][49][50][51][52]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSecond-generation biofuel production can be enhanced by growing bioenergy crops in locations unsuitable for farming food crops, leading to maximum utilization of marginal land.
“Second-generation biofuels production can also be enhanced by the growth of bioenergy crops in locations unsuitable for the farming of food crops, leading to maximum utilization of marginal land for second-generation biofuel production.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationWaste shark liver oil (WSLO) is a non-edible feedstock that can be used for making biodiesel cost-effectively.
“Al Hatrooshi et al. [102] used waste shark liver oil (WSLO) for making biodiesel as cost effective as possible, which is also a non-edible feedstock.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [102] Eze, 2020, Production of biodiesel from waste shark liver oil for biofuel applications, Renew. Energy source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA new strategy integrating microbiome data, gene expression profiling, proteomics, and metabolomics has enabled researchers to study cell metabolism in depth and rationally design strains.
“A new strategy to systematically integrate microbiome data, gene expression profiling, proteomics, and metabolomics has enabled researchers to study cell metabolism in depth, so that they can know that they are rationally designing strains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [60,[97][98][99][100]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningTo avoid negative impact of first-generation biofuel production on food supplies, use of agricultural waste residues and lignocellulosic feedstock (second-generation biofuel) might be a better option in a possible short-term period.
“Additionally, to avoid the negative impact of first-generation biofuel production on food supplies, use of agricultural waste residues and lignocellulosic feedstock (i.e., second-generation biofuel) might be a better option in a possible short-term period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels are environmentally friendly and cost effective.
- Rests on an assumption: Use of agricultural waste residues and lignocellulosic feedstock does not have the negative impact on food supplies that first-generation biofuels have.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMulti-omics technology development has opened a new perspective for evolutionary engineering and provided a reliable target for reverse metabolic engineering.
“The multi-omics technology development has opened up a new perspective for evolutionary engineering, and also provided a reliable target for reverse metabolic engineering [92].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] 2015, Yeast toxicogenomics: Lessons from a eukaryotic cell model and cell factory, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFirst-generation biofuels have direct consequences/effects on various products obtained from agricultural resources, therefore food prices might be affected.
“Previously, the main focus was on the first-generation biofuels which have direct consequences/effects on various products obtained from agricultural resources, therefore, food prices might be affected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAdaptive evolutionary engineering based on metabolic engineering can allow microorganisms to quickly obtain excellent phenotypes, but there are problems such as unclear gene targets and negative mutation interference.
“Adaptive evolutionary engineering based on metabolic engineering can allow microorganisms to quickly obtain excellent phenotypes, but there are problems such as unclear gene targets and negative mutation interference [90,91].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [90] Dragosits, 2013, Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology, Microb. Cell Fact. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [91] Farwick, 2014, Engineering of yeast hexose transporters to transport D-xylose without inhibition by D-glucose, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningShifting to next generation lignocellulosic biofuel might become more economically feasible because first-generation biofuels include various challenges in production and use.
“However, as first-generation biofuels include various challenges in their production and use, shifting to next generation lignocellulosic biofuel might become more economically feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe first major challenge is the high cost of biofuel (bioethanol) production and its economic feasibility compared to the price of crude oil.
“The first major challenge is the production cost, i.e., high cost of the biofuel (bioethanol) production and its economic feasibility compared to the price of crude oil [29,38,42,59].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [29] Popp, J., Harangi-Rakos, M., Gabnai, Z., Balogh, P., Antal, G., and Bai, A. (2016). Biofuels and their co-products as livestock feed: Global economic and environmental implications. Molecules, 21. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [38] Mizik, 2021, Economic and sustainability of biodiesel production- A systematic literature review, Clean Technol. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [42] Raud, 2019, Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [59] Sinitsyn, 2021, Bioconversion of renewable plant biomass. Second-generation biofuels: Raw materials, biomass pretreatment, enzymes, processes, and cost analysis, Biochemistry
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral researchers worldwide have reported and discussed the use of nanotechnology in enhanced biofuel production.
“Worldwide, several researchers have reported and discussed the use of nanotechnology in the enhanced biofuel production [40,[94][95][96].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40,[94][95][96]
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-edible lignocellulosic biomass is present abundantly in the natural ecosystem.
“It is well known that non-edible lignocellulosic biomass (such as vegetable grasses, forest residues, agricultural waste, etc.) is present abundantly in the natural ecosystem, therefore, it could be used as a feedstock for biofuel production.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Lignocellulosic biomass synthesized by photosynthesis on earth reaches more than 100 billion tons every year.
“The lignocellulosic biomass synthesized by photosynthesis on earth reaches more than 100 billion tons every year.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The major constituents of lignocellulosic feedstock consist of cellulose and hemicelluloses, about two thirds of the dry mass of plants.
“The major constituents of lignocellulosic feedstock consist of cellulose and hemicelluloses (i.e., about two thirds of the dry mass of plants), which are converted into sugars by means of thermochemical and biological processes.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cell walls of plants obstruct cellulosic biofuel production due to their morphological characteristics.
“However, it should be noted that, due to its morphological characteristics, cell walls of the plant obstruct the cellulosic biofuel production.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are primarily two processing routes for biofuel production from lignocellulosic raw materials: biochemical and thermochemical.
“There are primarily two processing routes followed for biofuel production from lignocellulosic raw materials: (i) Biochemical route, (ii) Thermochemical route.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels are environmentally friendly and cost effective.
“Various research around the globe is going now to obtain solutions in the form of sustainable energy sources, i.e., second-generation lignocellulosic biofuels, which would be environmentally friendly and cost effective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Use of agricultural waste residues and lignocellulosic feedstock does not have the negative impact on food supplies that first-generation biofuels have.
“Additionally, to avoid the negative impact of first-generation biofuel production on food supplies, use of agricultural waste residues and lignocellulosic feedstock (i.e., second-generation biofuel) might be a better option in a possible short-term period.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on cellulosic ethanol produced from lignocellulosic biomass has led to advancements in efficient pretreatment methods, such as steam explosion, acid hydrolysis, and enzymatic hydrolysis, and the development of robust enzymes.
“Research on cellulosic ethanol, produced from lignocellulosic biomass has led to advancements in efficient pretreatment methods, such as steam explosion, acid hydrolysis, and enzymatic hydrolysis, and the development of robust enzymes [134, 148].”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
The availability of sustainable and plentiful feedstocks poses a substantial obstacle to biofuel manufacturing.
“The availability of sustainable and plentiful feedstocks poses a substantial obstacle to biofuel manufacturing.”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
Competing demands for land, water, and resources from food production, conservation, and biofuel crops can raise concerns about land use change, deforestation, and biodiversity loss.
“Competing demands for land, water, and resources from food production, conservation, and biofuel crops can raise concerns about land use change, deforestation, and biodiversity loss.”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
Research is exploring the conversion of sugars into diesel-type biofuels using biological or chemical catalysts to produce biofuels with properties similar to petroleum-based diesel.
“Sugar conversion to diesel-type biofuels: another area of research involves the conversion of sugars into diesel-type biofuels using biological or chemical catalysts. This approach aims to produce biofuels with properties similar to petroleum-based diesel.”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
Advances in conversion technology can help biofuels become more economically viable by lowering production costs, improving output, boosting energy efficiency, and improving quality.
“Advances in conversion technology, such as enhanced enzyme efficiency, process optimization, and production scale, can help biofuels become more economically viable. Technological innovation can assist in lowering production costs, improving output, boosting energy efficiency, and improving the quality of biofuels [43, 134].”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
Price fluctuations in fossil fuels can affect the market potential of biofuels; when fossil fuel costs rise, biofuels become more competitive, and when they fall dramatically, biofuels may struggle to retain competitiveness.
“Price fluctuations in fossil fuels can have an impact on the market potential of biofuels. When fossil fuel costs rise, biofuels become more competitive and appealing to customers. However, if fossil fuel costs fall dramatically, biofuels may struggle to retain competitiveness [60, 134].”
From Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future (2024) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Nanotechnology review is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe text attributes [94] to Nizami and Rehan, whose work is numbered 97 in the reference list.
“Nizami and Rehan [94] discussed the use of nanotechnology and its tremendous ability to develop a cost-effective and efficient biofuel industry.”
“97. Nizami, A.S.; Rehan, M. Towards nanotechnology-based biofuel industry.”
Badawy study is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe text assigns Badawy et al. to [40], while the reference list places that study at 42.
“Badawy et al. [40] aimed to determine the most suitable biodiesel source among various sources such as Jatropha, rice straw, sugarcane, algae, etc.”
“42. Badawy, T.; Mansour, M.S.; Daabo, A.M.; Aziz, M.M.A.; Othman, A.A.; Barsoum, F.; Basouni, M.; Hussien, M.; Ghareeb, M.; Hamza, M.; et al. Selection of second-generation crop for biodiesel extraction and testing its impact with nano additives on diesel engine performance and emissions.”
Environmental-impact review is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe cited authors are listed at reference 32, not reference 30.
“Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha et al. [30] described in detail the environmental impacts related to biodiesel.”
“32. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H.; Tabatabaei, M.; Aghbashlo, M.; Khanali, M.; Demirbas, A. A comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives.”
Djandja pyrolysis review is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe Djandja et al. review is listed as reference 75, not reference 73.
“Djandja et al. [73] reported on the pyrolysis process and its use in the sewage sludge conversion in biofuel.”
“75. Djandja, O.S.; Wang, Z.C.; Wang, F.; Xu, Y.P.; Duan, P.G. Pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge for biofuel production: A review.”
Patel and Shah study has a conflicting reference number
MinorThe body cites Patel and Shah as [100], but the main numbered reference 100 is a Bassalo et al. paper. A Patel and Shah entry is also labeled 100 later in the reference list.
“Recently, Patel and Shah [100] discussed the integrated lignocellulosic biorefinery to obtain biofuel as well as more than 200 value added products.”
“100. Bassalo, M.C.; Liu, R.; Gill, R.T. Directed evolution and synthetic biology applications to microbial systems.”
Firouzi study is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe cited biomass-screening study appears at reference 46 rather than reference 44.
“Firouzi et al. [44] used a hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach for the screening of biomass for the biofuel production.”
“46. Firouzi, S.; Allahyari, M.S.; Isazadeh, M.; Nikkhah, A.; van Haute, S. Hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach to select appropriate biomass resources for biofuel production.”
Dionísio pretreatment study is cited under the wrong number
MinorThe text cites [55], but the Dionísio et al. study is numbered 57 in the reference list.
“Dionísio et al. [55] used dilute sulfuric acid for the pretreatment, which leads to 89.5% of hemicellulose solubilization.”
“57. Dionísio, S.R.; Santoro, D.C.J.; Bonan, C.I.D.G.; Soares, L.B.; Biazi, L.E.; Rabelo, S.C.; Ienczak, J.L. Second-generation ethanol process for integral use of hemicellulosic and cellulosic hydrolysates from diluted sulfuric acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse.”
Cites
Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass
MOSIER, N. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.06.025 · Cited by 6,251 · see citing works
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726 · see citing works
Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review
Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003 · Cited by 3,264 · see citing works
Second Generation Biofuels: High-Efficiency Microalgae for Biodiesel Production
Schenk, P. M., Thomas‐Hall, S. R., Stephens, E., Marx, U. C., Mussgnug, J. H., Posten, C. H., Kruse, O., & Hankamer, B. D. (2008) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-008-9008-8 · Cited by 2,335 · see citing works
Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks
Sánchez, Ó. J., & Cardona, C. A. (2008) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.11.013 · Cited by 1,826 · see citing works
Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low‐cost cellulosic ethanol
Yang, B., & Wyman, C. E. (2008) · Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.49 · Cited by 1,524 · see citing works
An overview of second generation biofuel technologies
Sims, R. E. H., Mabee, W., Saddler, J. N., & Taylor, M. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.046 · Cited by 1,497 · see citing works
Bioenergy and biofuels: History, status, and perspective
Guo, M., Song, W., & Buhain, J. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.013 · Cited by 931 · see citing works
Cell-wall carbohydrates and their modification as a resource for biofuels
Pauly, M., & Keegstra, K. (2008) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03463.x · Cited by 864 · see citing works
Adaptive laboratory evolution—Principles and applications for biotechnology
Dragosits, M., & Mattanovich, D. (2013) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/1475-2859-12-64 · Cited by 827 · see citing works
Biofuels: environment, technology and food security
Escobar, J. C., Lora, E. S., Venturini, O. J., Yáñez, E. E., Castillo, E. F., & Almazan, O. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2008.08.014 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Process and economic analysis of pretreatment technologies
Eggeman, T., & Elander, R. T. (2005) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.017 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Corn Stover for Fuel Ethanol
Sheehan, J., Aden, A., Paustian, K., Killian, K., Brenner, J., Walsh, M., & Nelson, R. (2003) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819803323059433 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Galbe, M., & Wallberg, O. (2019) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-019-1634-1 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Promising evolution of biofuel generations. Subject review
Alalwan, H. A., Alminshid, A. H., & Aljaafari, H. A. S. (2019) · Renewable Energy Focus · doi:10.1016/j.ref.2018.12.006 · Cited by 505 · see citing works
Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review
Gnansounou, E., & Dauriat, A. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing's on the walls
Gomez, L. D., Steele‐King, C. G., & McQueen‐Mason, S. J. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02422.x · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Prospects for pyrolysis technologies in the bioenergy sector: A review
Roy, P., & Dias, G. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.136 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Biofuels for a sustainable future
Liu, Y., Cruz-Morales, P., Zargar, A., Belcher, M. S., Pang, B., Englund, E., Dan, Q., Yin, K., & Keasling, J. D. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.052 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Application of nanoparticles in biofuels: An overview
Sekoai, P. T., Ouma, C. N. M., du Preez, S. P., Modisha, P. M., Engelbrecht, N., Bessarabov, D., & Ghimire, A. (2018) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.030 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Biomass as Renewable Energy: Worldwide Research Trends
Perea-Moreno, M.-Á., Salmerón-Manzano, E., & Perea-Moreno, A.-J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030863 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Evolution retrospective for alternative fuels: First to fourth generation
Dutta, K., Daverey, A., & Lin, J.-G. (2014) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.044 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
From first generation biofuels to advanced solar biofuels
Aro, E.-M. (2016) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0730-0 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
A comprehensive review on the environmental impacts of diesel/biodiesel additives
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, H., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Khanali, M., & Demirbas, A. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.050 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Wang, C., Dong, D., Wang, H., Müller, K., Qin, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, W. (2016) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0440-2 · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Third generation biofuels from microalgae
Dragone, G., Fernandes, B. D., Vicente, A. A., & Teixeira, J. A. (2010) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Hussain, F., Shah, S. Z., Ahmad, H., Abubshait, S. A., Abubshait, H. A., Laref, A., Manikandan, A., Kusuma, H. S., & Iqbal, M. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110603 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Patel, A., & Shah, A. R. (2021) · Journal of Bioresources and Bioproducts · doi:10.1016/j.jobab.2021.02.001 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Potentials and challenges in lignocellulosic biofuel production technology
Raud, M., Kikas, T., Sippula, O., & Shurpali, N. J. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.020 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Farwick, A., Bruder, S., Schadeweg, V., Oreb, M., & Boles, E. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323464111 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Richardson, Y., Blin, J., & Julbe, A. (2012) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2011.12.001 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Bio-aviation Fuel: A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of the Supply Chain Components
Doliente, S. S., Narayan, A., Tapia, J. F. D., Samsatli, N. J., Zhao, Y., & Samsatli, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.00110 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Beig, B., Riaz, M., Naqvi, S. R., Hassan, M., Zheng, Z., Karimi, K., Pugazhendhi, A., Atabani, A. E., & Lan, N. T. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119670 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Wagner, A. O., Lackner, N., Mutschlechner, M., Prem, E. M., Markt, R., & Illmer, P. (2018) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en11071797 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Economic and Sustainability of Biodiesel Production—A Systematic Literature Review
Mizik, T., & Gyarmati, G. (2021) · Clean Technologies · doi:10.3390/cleantechnol3010002 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Sustainable environmental management and related biofuel technologies
Sharma, S., Kundu, A., Basu, S., Shetti, N. P., & Aminabhavi, T. M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111096 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Removal of Fermentation Inhibitors Formed during Pretreatment of Biomass by Polymeric Adsorbents
Weil, J. R., Dien, B. S., Bothast, R. J., et al. (2002) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0201056 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Pandit, S., Savla, N., Sonawane, J. M., Sani, A., Gupta, P. K., Mathuriya, A. S., Kumar, A., Jadhav, D. A., Jung, S. P., & Prasad, R. (2021) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation7030169 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Self-citationAzam, M., Jahromy, S. S., Raza, W., Raza, N., Lee, S. S., Kim, K.-H., & Winter, F. (2020) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105291 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Next-generation genome-scale models for metabolic engineering
King, Z. A., Lloyd, C. J., Feist, A. M., & Palsson, B. O. (2015) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.12.016 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Pyrolysis of Municipal Sewage Sludge for Biofuel Production: A Review
Djandja, O. S., Wang, Z., Wang, F., Xu, Y., & Duan, P. (2020) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.0c01546 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Impact of feedstock quality and variation on biochemical and thermochemical conversion
Li, C., Aston, J. E., Lacey, J. A., Thompson, V. S., & Thompson, D. N. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.063 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Rasid, N. S. A., Shamjuddin, A., Rahman, A. Z. A., & Amin, N. A. S. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129038 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Biofuels and Their Co-Products as Livestock Feed: Global Economic and Environmental Implications
Popp, J., Harangi-Rákos, M., Gabnai, Z., Balogh, P., Antal, G., & Bai, A. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21030285 · Cited by 142 · cited 1× · see citing works
“, high cost of the biofuel (bioethanol) production and its economic feasibility compared to the price of crude oil [29,38,42,59].”
BackgroundGregg, D. J., Boussaid, A., & Saddler, J. N. (1998) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(97)00103-x · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Investigation of Biofuel as a Potential Renewable Energy Source
Khan, M. A. H., Bonifacio, S., Clowes, J., Foulds, A., Holland, R., Matthews, J. C., Percival, C. J., & Shallcross, D. E. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12101289 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Zhu, N., Yang, J., Ji, L., Liu, J., Yi, Y., & Yuan, H. (2016) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-016-0658-z · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Bio-based liquid fuels as a source of renewable energy: A review
Oumer, A. N., Hasan, M. M., Baheta, A. T., Mamat, R., & Abdullah, A. A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.02.022 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Shahid, M. K., Batool, A., Kashif, A., Nawaz, M. H., Aslam, M., Iqbal, N., & Choi, Y. (2021) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113268 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Second Generation Ethanol Production by Thermophilic Bacteria
Scully, S. M., & Örlygsson, J. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en8010001 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Biofuels, environmental sustainability and food security: A review of 51 countries
Subramaniam, Y., Masron, T. A., & Azman, N. H. N. (2020) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101549 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Nazari, M. T., Mazutti, J., Basso, L. G., Colla, L. M., & Brandli, L. (2021) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-020-01110-4 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Towards nanotechnology-based biofuel industry
Nizami, A.-S., & Rehan, M. (2018) · Biofuel Research Journal · doi:10.18331/brj2018.5.2.2 · Cited by 120 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Nizami and Rehan [94] discussed the use of nanotechnology and its tremendous ability to develop a cost-effective and efficient biofuel industry.”
BackgroundModifying plants for biofuel and biomaterial production
Furtado, A., Lupoi, J. S., Hoang, N. V., Healey, A., Singh, S., Simmons, B. A., & Henry, R. J. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12300 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Sarkar, M., & Sarkar, B. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121200 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Production of biodiesel and bioethanol using algal biomass harvested from fresh water river
Kumar, V., Nanda, M., Joshi, H. C., Singh, A., Sharma, S., & Verma, M. (2017) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.016 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Synergistic effects of co-gasification of municipal solid waste and biomass in fixed-bed gasifier
Cai, J., Zeng, R., Zheng, W., et al. (2020) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2020.09.063 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Rapeseed residues utilization for energy and 2nd generation biofuels
Zabaniotou, A., Ioannidou, O., & Skoulou, V. (2008) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.09.003 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Biofuels: Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Global Warming
(2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-81-322-3763-1 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Development of highly efficient, low-cost lignocellulolytic enzyme systems in the post-genomic era
Liu, G., Qin, Y., Li, Z., & Qu, Y. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.001 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Research related to expression level and mechanism of enzymes laid the foundation for the subsequent study of new cellulase gene extraction, heterologous protein expression, purification, and degradation mechanisms [81,82].”
BackgroundFirouzi, S., Allahyari, M. S., Isazadeh, M., et al. (2021) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144449 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Lignocellulosic biofuel production: review of alternatives
Machineni, L. (2019) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-019-00445-x · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Narwane, V. S., Yadav, V. S., Raut, R. D., Narkhede, B. E., & Gardas, B. B. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.077 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Arefin, M. A., Rashid, F., & Islam, A. (2021) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.2180 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Elumalai, P. V., Nambiraj, M., Parthasarathy, M., et al. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119200 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Dionísio, S. R., Santoro, D. C. J., Bonan, C. I. D. G., et al. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121290 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Production of biodiesel from waste shark liver oil for biofuel applications
Al Hatrooshi, A. S., Eze, V. C., & Harvey, A. P. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.002 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Nimchua, T. (2012) · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.4014/jmb.1108.08037 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Directed evolution and synthetic biology applications to microbial systems
Bassalo, M. C., Liu, R., & Gill, R. T. (2016) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.016 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Present scenario and future scope of food waste to biofuel production
Dhiman, S., & Mukherjee, G. (2020) · Journal of Food Process Engineering · doi:10.1111/jfpe.13594 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Xie, S., Syrenne, R., Sun, S., & Yuan, J. S. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.02.007 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Jusakulvijit, P., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2021) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-021-01424-y · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Badawy, T., Mansour, M. S., Daabo, A. M., Abdel Aziz, M. M., Othman, A. A., Barsoum, F., Basouni, M., Hussien, M., Ghareeb, M., Hamza, M., et al. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.121605 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Systems and synthetic biology approaches to alter plant cell walls and reduce biomass recalcitrance
Kalluri, U. C., Yin, H., Yang, X., & Davison, B. H. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12283 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Talmadge, M. S., Kinchin, C. M., Chum, H. L., et al. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119960 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Yeast toxicogenomics: Lessons from a eukaryotic cell model and cell factory
dos Santos, S. C., & Sá-Correia, I. (2015) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2015.03.001 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Biofuel; A Sustainable Renewable Source Of Energy-A Review
Afolalu, S. A., Yusuf, O. O., Abioye, A. A., Emetere, M. E., Ongbali, S. O., & Samuel, O. D. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012040 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Morales-Martínez, J. L., Aguilar‐Uscanga, M. G., Bolaños‐Reynoso, E., & López‐Zamora, L. (2020) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-020-10197-6 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Production of ethanol from biomass - Research in Sweden
Galbe, M., Lidén, G., & Zacchi, G. (2005) · Lund University Publications (Lund University) · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Gumienna, M., Szambelan, K., Jeleń, H. H., & CZARNECKI, Z. (2014) · Journal of the Institute of Brewing · doi:10.1002/jib.181 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
The second- and third-generation biofuel technologies: comparative perspectives
Ganguly, P., Sarkhel, R., & Das, P. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00002-0 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Bioliquids from raw waste animal fats: an alternative renewable energy source
Rosson, E., Sgarbossa, P., Pedrielli, F., et al. (2020) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-020-00634-z · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Sinitsyn, A. P., & Sinitsyna, O. A. (2021) · Biochemistry (Moscow) · doi:10.1134/s0006297921140121 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Synthetic biology for biofuels: Building designer microbes from the scratch
Ghim, C.-M., Kim, T., Mitchell, R. J., & Lee, S. K. (2010) · Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12257-009-3065-5 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Biofuels as the Starring Substitute to Fossil Fuels
Muhammad, U. L. (2018) · Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.11648/j.pse.20180201.17 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Mund, N. K., Dash, D., Mishra, P., et al. (2021) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-020-01225-8 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Rashamuse, K., Sanyika Tendai, W., Mathiba, K., Ngcobo, T., Mtimka, S., & Brady, D. (2017) · Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/bab.1480 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Response surface optimization of acid pretreatment of cassava stem for bioethanol production
Sivamani, S., Baskar, R., & Chandrasekaran, A. P. (2019) · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1002/ep.13335 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Lima, D. R. S., Paranhos, A. G. D. O., Adarme, O. F. H., et al. (2021) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-020-01234-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Jutakridsada, P., Saengprachatanarug, K., Kasemsiri, P., Hızıroǧlu, S., Kamwilaisak, K., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2017) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-017-0104-x · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Heterogeneous Catalysis of Second Generation Oil for Biodiesel Production: A Review
Aderibigbe, F. A., Shiru, S., Saka, H. B., Amosa, M. K., Mustapha, S. I., Alhassan, M. I., Adejumo, A. L., Abdulraheem, M., & Owolabi, R. U. (2021) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.202000035 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Screening for cellulase encoding clones in metagenomic libraries
Ilmberger, N., & Streit, W. R. (2017) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6691-2_12 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Microbial consortium OEM1 cultivation for higher lignocellulose degradation and chlorophenol removal
Liang, J., Lin, Y., Tian, L., et al. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra04703g · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Regulatory mechanisms related to biofuel tolerance in producing microbes
Fu, Y., Chen, L., & Zhang, W. (2016) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13162 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
(2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119793038 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Design and Construction of a Semi-batch Pyrolysis Reactor for the Production of Biofuel
Fombu, A. H., & Ochonogor, A. E. (2021) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/730/1/012041 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kumar, S., Kumar, R., and Pandey, A. (2019). Biofuel production from biomass: Toward sustainable development. Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Elsevier.
- Rai, 2019, Micrococcus luteus 2030: A novel lipolytic bacterial strain isolated from local contaminated soil in Saudi Arabia, Sylwan, 163, 132
- Shi, 2011, China’s resources of biomass feedstock, Eng. Sci., 13, 16
- Raud, 2016, Second-generation bioethanol production: A review of strategies for waste valorization, Agron. Res., 15, 830
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Biofuel production: exploring renewable energy solutions for a greener future
El-Araby, R. (2024) · Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts · doi:10.1186/s13068-024-02571-9 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Integrated biorefinery approaches for the industrialization of cellulosic ethanol fuel
Qiao, J., Cui, H., Wang, M., Fu, X., Wang, X., Li, X., & Huang, H. (2022) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127516 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Biofuels Production and Processing Technology
Tropea, A. (2022) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation8070319 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Microbial biotechnology for bioenergy: general overviews
Aransiola, S. A., Adeniyi, O. S., Omoregie, I. P., Akinhanmi, F. O., Oniha, M. I., & Maddela, N. R. (2024) · Microbial Biotechnology for Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-14112-6.00001-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rai, A. K., Al Makishah, N. H., Wen, Z., Gupta, G., Pandit, S., & Prasad, R.
- Affiliations
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 31441, Saudi Arabia
- Environmental Sciences Department, Faculty of Meteorology, Environment and Arid Land Agriculture, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
- Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
- SAGE University Bhopal (IN)
- Sharda University (IN)
- Mahatma Gandhi Central University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Prasad, Ram
- Venue
- Fermentation
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-04-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 161
- ISSN
- 2311-5637 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4225922245
- Semantic Scholar
- a0c5f895418d5fb29c5c7064fa2e13acccf63a7a
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 96
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12
- FWCI
- 5.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fermentation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- lignocellulosic biofuels, second-generation biofuels, non-food biomass, cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose, bioenergy, biofuel production costs, biomass conversion, fossil fuel substitution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review