Yeast toxicogenomics: Lessons from a eukaryotic cell model and cell factory
Abstract
The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae remains a highly relevant experimental model in the field of toxicogenomics and is an important microbial cell factory for the production of added-value chemicals and biofuels. Its deep functional characterization coupled with the straightforward exploitation of Omic approaches and metabolic engineering, at the frontline of systems and synthetic biology, is instrumental to obtain mechanistic insights into the response to multiple toxicants and for the development of robust industrial strains. This critical review focuses on the current field, ranging from the identification of toxicological outcomes of exposure to environmental toxicants, with impact in risk assessment, bioremediation and plant biotechnology, to the improvement of biomass-based biorefinery processes, with applications in pharmacology and in the food and beverages industry.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multi-omics technology development has opened a new perspective for evolutionary engineering and provided a reliable target for reverse metabolic engineering.
“The multi-omics technology development has opened up a new perspective for evolutionary engineering, and also provided a reliable target for reverse metabolic engineering [92].”
From Recent Developments in Lignocellulosic Biofuels, a Renewable Source of Bioenergy (2022) · cites this paper as [92]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 69 · Cited by 49
- Authors
- dos Santos, S. C., & Sá-Correia, I.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 33
- Pages
- 183-191
- ISSN
- 0958-1669 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1980033233
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- toxicogenomics, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yeast, risk assessment, bioremediation, plant biotechnology, industrial yeast strains, metabolic engineering, synthetic biology, food and beverage industry
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Eukaryotic Cells, Food, Humans, Models, Genetic, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Toxicogenetics, Biofuels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review