CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sensing the unreachable: challenges and opportunities in biofilm detection

Xu, Yikang, Dhaouadi, Yousr, Stoodley, Paul, Ren, Dacheng·2020·Current Opinion in Biotechnology
DOI 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.009PMC PMC7242124
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.009

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Singh, 2017, Understanding the mechanism of bacterial biofilms resistance to antimicrobial agents, Open Microbiol J, 11, 53, 10.2174/1874285801711010053 · DOI
  2. Lebeaux, 2014, Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 78, 510, 10.1128/MMBR.00013-14 · DOI
  3. Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces, Emerg Infect Dis, 8, 881, 10.3201/eid0809.020063 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Pawlowski, 2005, Bacterial biofilm formation on a human cochlear implant, Otol Neurotol, 26, 972, 10.1097/01.mao.0000169047.38759.8b · DOI
  5. Zimmerli, 2017, Orthopaedic biofilm infections, APMIS, 125, 353, 10.1111/apm.12687 · DOI
  6. Veerachamy, 2014, Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: a review, Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 228, 1083, 10.1177/0954411914556137 · DOI
  7. Azeredo, 2017, Critical review on biofilm methods, Crit Rev Microbiol, 43, 313, 10.1080/1040841X.2016.1208146 · DOI
  8. Høiby, 2015, ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014, Clin Microbiol Infect, 21, S1, 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hall-Stoodley, 2012, Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections, FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 65, 127, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x · DOI
  10. Li, 2018, Management of periprosthetic joint infection, Hip Pelvis, 30, 138, 10.5371/hp.2018.30.3.138 · DOI
  11. Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms, Clin Microbiol Rev, 15, 167, 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Fisher, 2017, Persistent bacterial infections and persister cells, Nat Rev Microbiol, 15, 453, 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.42 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Shen, 2010, Bacterial viability in starved and revitalized biofilms: comparison of viability staining and direct culture, J Endod, 36, 1820, 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.029 · DOI
  14. Bjerkan, 2009, Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro, Acta Orthop, 80, 245, 10.3109/17453670902947457 · DOI
  15. Liu, 2016, PCR-based approaches for the detection of clinical methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Open Microbiol J, 10, 45, 10.2174/1874285801610010045 · DOI
  16. Tsalik, 2018, New molecular diagnostic approaches to bacterial infections and antibacterial resistance, Annu Rev Med, 69, 379, 10.1146/annurev-med-052716-030320 · DOI
  17. Quainoo, 2017, Whole-genome sequencing of bacterial pathogens: the future of nosocomial outbreak analysis, Clin Microbiol Rev, 30, 1015, 10.1128/CMR.00016-17 · DOI
  18. Deirmengian, 2015, The alpha-defensin test for periprosthetic joint infection responds to a wide spectrum of organisms, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, 2229, 10.1007/s11999-015-4152-x · DOI
  19. Lasa, 2006, Bap: a family of surface proteins involved in biofilm formation, Res Microbiol, 157, 99, 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.11.003 · DOI
  20. Cucarella, 2004, Role of biofilm-associated protein bap in the pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus, Infect Immun, 72, 2177, 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2177-2185.2004 · DOI
  21. Noori, 2014, A conserved region from biofilm associated protein as a biomarker for detection of Acinetobacter baumannii, Microb Pathog, 77, 84, 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.11.004 · DOI
  22. Yousefi, 2016, Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation in urinary tract infection, Iran J Public Health, 45, 485
  23. Antypas, 2018, Rapid diagnostic assay for detection of cellulose in urine as biomarker for biofilm-related urinary tract infections, NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 4, 26, 10.1038/s41522-018-0069-y · DOI
  24. Pan, 2014, Detection of antibodies to the biofilm exopolysaccharide of Histophilus somni following infection in cattle by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, Clin Vaccine Immunol, 21, 1463, 10.1128/CVI.00384-14 · DOI
  25. Høiby, 2017, Diagnosis of biofilm infections in cystic fibrosis patients, APMIS, 125, 339, 10.1111/apm.12689 · DOI
  26. Nagler, 2018, Extracellular DNA in natural environments: features, relevance and applications, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 102, 6343, 10.1007/s00253-018-9120-4 · DOI
  27. Castillo Pedraza, 2017, Extracellular DNA and lipoteichoic acids interact with exopolysaccharides in the extracellular matrix of Streptococcus mutans biofilms, Biofouling, 33, 722, 10.1080/08927014.2017.1361412 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Guan, 2018, An extraction free modified o-phthalaldehyde assay for quantifying residual protein and microbial biofilms on surfaces, Biofouling, 34, 925, 10.1080/08927014.2018.1521959 · DOI
  29. Li, 2012, Quorum sensing and bacterial social interactions in biofilms, Sensors (Basel), 12, 2519, 10.3390/s120302519 · DOI
  30. Singh, 2000, Quorum-sensing signals indicate that cystic fibrosis lungs are infected with bacterial biofilms, Nature, 407, 762, 10.1038/35037627 · DOI
  31. Skindersoe, 2009, Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing signal molecules interfere with dendritic cell-induced T-cell proliferation, FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 55, 335, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2008.00533.x · DOI
  32. Jensen, 2010, The immune system vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms, FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 59, 292, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00706.x · DOI
  33. Moser, 2017, Biofilms and host response - helpful or harmful, APMIS, 125, 320, 10.1111/apm.12674 · DOI
  34. Azevedo, 2003, Establishment of a continuous model system to study Helicobacter pylori survival in potable water biofilms, Water Sci Technol, 47, 155, 10.2166/wst.2003.0307 · DOI
  35. You, 2006, Design of LNA probes that improve mismatch discrimination, Nucleic Acids Res, 34, e60, 10.1093/nar/gkl175 · DOI
  36. Nguyen, 2018, Longitudinal monitoring of biofilm formation via robust surface-enhanced Raman scattering quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-produced metabolites, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10, 12364, 10.1021/acsami.7b18592 · DOI
  37. Wu, 2014, Culture-free diagnostics of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection by silver nanorod array based SERS from clinical sputum samples, Nanomed: Nanotechnol Biol Med, 10, 1863, 10.1016/j.nano.2014.04.010 · DOI
  38. Bodelón, 2016, Detection and imaging of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm communities by surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering, Nat Mater, 15, 1203, 10.1038/nmat4720 · DOI
  39. Carrel, 2017, Biofilm imaging in porous media by laboratory X-Ray tomography: combining a non-destructive contrast agent with propagation-based phase-contrast imaging tools, PLoS One, 12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0180374 · DOI
  40. Niehaus, 2016, Development of X-ray micro-focus computed tomography to image and quantify biofilms in central venous catheter models in vitro, Microbiology, 162, 1629, 10.1099/mic.0.000334 · DOI
  41. Sellmyer, 2017, Bacterial infection imaging with, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114, 8372, 10.1073/pnas.1703109114 · DOI
  42. Levine, 2017, Clinical history of the theranostic radionuclide approach to neuroendocrine tumors and other types of cancer: historical review based on an interview of Eric P. Krenning by Rachel Levine, J Nucl Med, 58, 3S, 10.2967/jnumed.116.186502 · DOI
  43. van Duuren, 2017, Use of single-frequency impedance spectroscopy to characterize the growth dynamics of biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Sci Rep, 7, 10.1038/s41598-017-05273-5 · DOI
  44. Liu, 2018, Monitoring of bacteria biofilms forming process by in-situ impedimetric biosensor chip, Biosens Bioelectron, 112, 86, 10.1016/j.bios.2018.04.019 · DOI
  45. Furst, 2019, Impedance-based detection of bacteria, Chem Rev, 119, 700, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00381 · DOI
  46. Gutiérrez, 2016, Monitoring in real time the formation and removal of biofilms from clinical related pathogens using an impedance-based technology, PLoS One, 11, 10.1371/journal.pone.0163966 · DOI
  47. Subramanian, 2017, An integrated microsystem for real-time detection and threshold-activated treatment of bacterial biofilms, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 9, 31362, 10.1021/acsami.7b04828 · DOI
  48. Huiszoon, 2019, Flexible platform for in situ impedimetric detection and bioelectric effect treatment of Escherichia coli biofilms, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 66, 1337, 10.1109/TBME.2018.2872896 · DOI
  49. Freebairn, 2013, Electrical methods of controlling bacterial adhesion and biofilm on device surfaces, Expert Rev Med Devices, 10, 85, 10.1586/erd.12.70 · DOI
  50. Niepa, 2012, Controlling Pseudomonas aeruginosa persister cells by weak electrochemical currents and synergistic effects with tobramycin, Biomaterials, 33, 7356, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.06.092 · DOI
  51. Sultana, 2016, Eradication of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and persister cells using an electrochemical scaffold and enhanced antibiotic susceptibility, NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes, 2, 2, 10.1038/s41522-016-0003-0 · DOI
  52. Puiu, 2015, Enhanced sensitive love wave surface acoustic wave sensor designed for immunoassay formats, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 15, 10511, 10.3390/s150510511 · DOI
  53. Kim, 2016, A surface acoustic wave biofilm sensor integrated with a treatment method based on the bioelectric effect, Sens Actuators A: Phys, 238, 140, 10.1016/j.sna.2015.12.001 · DOI
  54. Li, 2017, Gold nanoparticle-based low limit of detection Love wave biosensor for carcinoembryonic antigens, Biosens Bioelectron, 95, 48, 10.1016/j.bios.2017.04.012 · DOI
  55. Tietze, 2018, Monitoring of soft deposition layers in liquid-filled tubes with guided acoustic waves excited by clamp-on transducers, Sensors, 18, 10.3390/s18020526 · DOI
  56. Wang, 2017, Preventing microbial biofilms on catheter tubes using ultrasonic guided waves, Sci Rep, 7
  57. Wang, 2017, A label-free fiber optic SPR biosensor for specific detection of C-reactive protein, Sci Rep, 7
  58. Zhang, 2018, Dynamic dispersal of surface layer biofilm induced by nanosized TiO2 based on surface Plasmon resonance and waveguide, Appl Environ Microbiol, 84, e00047, 10.1128/AEM.00047-18 · DOI
  59. Zheng, 2019, Simultaneous and ultrasensitive detection of foodborne bacteria by gold nanoparticles-amplified microcantilever array biosensor, Front Chem, 7, 232, 10.3389/fchem.2019.00232 · DOI
  60. Akram, 2019, Enhanced avidity from a multivalent fluorescent antimicrobial peptide enables pathogen detection in a human lung model, Sci Rep, 9, 10.1038/s41598-019-44804-0 · DOI
  61. Wan, 2018, Bacterial Metabolism During Biofilm Growth Investigated by 13C Tracing, Front Microbiol, 9, 2657, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02657 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 119

Metadata

Authors
Xu, Y., Dhaouadi, Y., Stoodley, P., & Ren, D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
64
Pages
79-84
ISSN
0958-1669
DOI
10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.009
PMC
PMC7242124
Cited by
119
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Science Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensing the unreachable: challenges and opportunities in biofilm detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.009
The paper
Xu, Y., Dhaouadi, Y., Stoodley, P., & Ren, D. (2020). Sensing the unreachable: challenges and opportunities in biofilm detection. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.009