Cited by 179Medication Adherence and ComplianceChronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Treatment burden and treatment fatigue as barriers to health.

Open access
Heckman, Bryan W, Mathew, Amanda R, Carpenter, Matthew J·2015·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

Effective management of chronic diseases involves sustained changes in health behavior, which often requires substantial effort and patient burden. As treatment burden is associated with reduced adherence across several chronic conditions, its assessment and treatment are important clinical priorities. The balance between patient demands and capacity (e.g., coping resources) may be indexed by patients' subjective experience of treatment fatigue. We present a modified workload-capacity model that incorporates evidence that treatment fatigue may 1) be caused by increased workload due to treatment burden (e.g., intensity, complications) and 2) undermine adherence. Emerging technology-based interventions may be well-suited to reduce treatment burden, prevent treatment fatigue, and increase treatment adherence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.004

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Heckman, B. W., Mathew, A. R., & Carpenter, M. J.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Heckman, Bryan W
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
5
Pages
31-36
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069363844
Cited by
179
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32 DA007288, F32 DA036947)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
treatment burden, treatment fatigue, medication adherence, chronic disease management, coping resources, health behavior change, patient burden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review