Cited by 113Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Attachment and psychotherapy

Slade, Arietta, Holmes, Jeremy·2019·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

Attachment theory provides a model for understanding (1) development within the context of the child's primary, and formative relationships, and (2) an adult's orientation toward lifelong intimate connections, social relationships, and autonomous exploration. Psychotherapy researchers have linked measures of patient attachment with therapeutic alliance, process, and outcomes. Studies of ruptures and discourse analysis distinguish in-session behaviors associated with different patterns of insecure attachments, and identify distinct ways of working with them. The therapist's own attachment organization and mentalizing capacity also play a significant role in therapeutic success. The key tenets of attachment-informed psychotherapy are: (1) the therapist-patient attachment relationship is central to promoting change, (2) the in vivo recognition of attachment dynamics during therapy guides formulation and intervention, and (3) therapy can reshape attachment dynamics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.06.008

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processing relational patterns within therapeutic relationship allows patients to experience corrective emotional experiences that shift maladaptive interaction styles toward healthier, more reciprocal ones.

    “By processing these relational patterns, within the therapeutic relationship, patients can experience corrective emotional experiences that help shift maladaptive interaction styles toward healthier, more reciprocal ones (166–168).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slade, A., & Holmes, J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Corresponding author
Slade, Arietta
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
25
Pages
152-156
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2875109339
Cited by
113
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment theory, therapeutic relationship, insecure attachment, attachment dynamics, therapeutic process, treatment outcomes, patient attachment
MeSH terms
Mentalization, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Humans, Object Attachment, Physician-Patient Relations, Psychological Theory, Psychotherapy, Social Behavior, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review