CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 120Satellite Communication SystemsSpacecraft Dynamics and ControlSpacecraft Design and Technology

Optimization-Based Scheduling for the Single-Satellite, Multi-Ground Station Communication Problem

Spangelo, Sara, Cutler, James, Gilson, Kyle, Cohn, Amy·2015·Computers & Operations Research
DOI 10.1016/j.cor.2014.11.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cor.2014.11.004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Baker, 2008, The large benefits of Small-Satellite missions, Trans Am Geophys Union, 89, 301, 10.1029/2008EO330001 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Moretto, 2008, CubeSat mission to investigate ionospheric Irregularities, Space Weather, 6, S11002, 10.1029/2008SW000441 · DOI
  3. Swenson C, Sojka JC, Fish C, Larsen M, Bingham B, Young Q, et al. The high-latitude dynamic e-field (HiDef) explorer, a proposed network of 90 cubesats. In: QB-50 workshop; November 2009.
  4. J Cutler. Ground station markup language. In: IEEE aerospace conference; March 2004.
  5. Baek Seung-Woo, Cho Kyeum-Rae, Lee Dae-Woo, Bainum Peter M, Kim Hae-Dong. Development of scheduling algorithm and GUI for the autonomous satellite mission operation. In: Sixtieth international astronautical congress(IAC), vol. 7, Republic of Daejeon, Korea; 2009. p. 5527–34.
  6. Lemaitre, 2002, Selecting and scheduling observations of agile satellites, Aerosp Sci Technol, 6, 367, 10.1016/S1270-9638(02)01173-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bensana, 1999, Earth observation satellite management, Constraints, 4, 293, 10.1023/A:1026488509554 · DOI
  8. Wolfe, 2000, Three scheduling algorithms applied to the earth observing systems domain, Manag Sci, 46, 148, 10.1287/mnsc.46.1.148.15134 · DOI
  9. Sun Baolin, Mao Lifei, Wang Wenxiang, Xie Xing, Qin Qianqing. Satellite mission scheduling algorithm based on genetic algorithm. In: Second international conference on space information technology (SICE), vol. 6795; 2007. p. 67950U. · DOI
  10. Martin, 2002, Satellite image collection optimization, Opt Eng, 41, 2083, 10.1117/1.1495856 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jian Li, Cheng Wang. Resource planning and scheduling of payload for satellite with particle swarm optimization, USA, vol. 6795; 2007. p. 67951–1. · DOI
  12. Verfaillie, 2010, How to model planning and scheduling problems using constraint networks on timelines, Knowl Eng Rev, 25, 319, 10.1017/S0269888910000172 · DOI
  13. Pemberton J, Galiber F. A constraint-based approach to satellite scheduling. In: DIMACS workshop on constraint programming and large scale discrete optimization, Providence, RI; 2001. p. 101–14. · DOI
  14. Muraoka Taijiro Ohno Hiroyasu, Cohen Ronald H, Doi Naoyuki. Aster observation scheduling algorithm. In: International symposium space mission operations and ground data systems; 1998.
  15. Han Soon mi, Beak Seung woo, Cho Kyuem rae, Lee Dae woo, Kim Hae dong. Satellite mission scheduling using genetic algorithm. In: SICE annual conference; 2008. p. 1226–30. · DOI
  16. Barbulescu, 2004, Scheduling space-ground communications for the Air Force satellite control network, J Sched, 7, 7, 10.1023/B:JOSH.0000013053.32600.3c · DOI · Paper page
  17. Globus Al, Crawford James, Lohn Jason, Pryor Anna. A comparison of techniques for scheduling earth observing satellites. In: Innovative applications of artificial intelligence conference, IAAI׳04, AAAI Press, San Jose, CA; 2004. p. 836–43.
  18. Potter William, Gasch John. A photo album of earth: Scheduling landsat 7 mission daily activities. In: Fifth international conference on space operations, Tokyo, Japan; 1998.
  19. Soma P, Rao J, Padmashree G. Multi-satellite scheduling system for LEO satellite operations. In: SpaceOps conference; 1998.
  20. Rabideau G, Knight R, Chien S, Fukunaga A, Govindjee A. Iterative repair planning for spacecraft operations using the aspen system. In: Fifth international symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space (ESA SP-440), Noordwijk, Netherlands; 1999. p. 99–106.
  21. Defence Harrison Price, Harrison SA, Price ME, Philpott MS. Task scheduling for satellite based imagery. In: UK planning and scheduling workshop, special interest group, University of Salford, UK; 1999. p. 64–78.
  22. Dutta, 1992, An optimization model of communications satellite planning, IEEE Trans Commun, 40, 1463, 10.1109/26.163567 · DOI
  23. Bianchessi, 2007, A heuristic for the multi-satellite, multi-orbit and multi-user management of earth observation satellites, Eur J Oper Res, 177, 750, 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.12.026 · DOI
  24. Arkali, 2009, Scheduling support times for satellites with overlapping visibilities, Prod Oper Manag, 17, 224, 10.3401/poms.1080.0016 · DOI
  25. Cheung Kar-Ming, Lee CH, Gearhart WB, Vo T, Sindi S. Link-capability driven network planning and operation. In: IEEE aerospace conference, vol. 7; 2002. p. 7-3281–5. · DOI
  26. Zheng W, Meng X, Huan H. Genetic algorithm for TDRS communication scheduling with resource constraints. In: International conference on computer science and software engineering; December 2008.
  27. Spangelo, 2012, Models and tools to evaluate space communication network capacity, IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst, 48, 2387, 10.1109/TAES.2012.6237598 · DOI
  28. Bahcivan H, Kelley M, Cutler J. Radar and rocket comparison of UHF radar scattering from auroral electrojet irregularities: implications for a nano-satellite radar. J Geophys Res; 2009;114(June). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spangelo, S., Cutler, J., Gilson, K., & Cohn, A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Cohn, Amy
ORCID
Venue
Computers & Operations Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
57
Pages
1-16
ISSN
0305-0548 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cor.2014.11.004
OpenAlex
W2082026440
Cited by
120
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Computers & Operations Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation through National Science Foundation (NSF) (CNS-1035236)
  • Canadian National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) (Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR))
  • Zonta Amelia Earhart Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
mixed integer programming, small satellites, tractability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review