Cited by 113Vehicle Routing Optimization MethodsScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsSatellite Communication Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Agile earth observation satellite scheduling: An orienteering problem with time-dependent profits and travel times

Open access

Abstract

Abstract The scheduling problem of an Agile Earth Observation Satellite is to schedule a subset of weighted observation tasks with each a specific “profit” in order to maximize the total collected profit, under its operational constraints. The “time-dependent transition time” and the “time-dependent profit” are two crucial features of this problem. The former relates to the fact that each pair of consecutive tasks requires a transition time to maneuver the look angle of the camera from the previous task to the next task. The latter follows from the fact that a different look angle of an observation leads to a different image quality, i.e., the collected profit. Since the specific look angle of a task depends on its observation start time, both the transition time and the profit are “time-dependent”. We present a concept of “minimal transition time” to displace the transition time. On this basis, a bidirectional dynamic programming based iterated local search (BDP-ILS) algorithm is proposed, equipped with an insert procedure that avoids a full feasibility check. The bidirectional dynamic programming approach is integrated into the algorithm in order to efficiently evaluate a solution or an insert move when time-dependent profits are considered. Two types of experiments (with and without the time-dependent profits) are designed to evaluate the performance. The results without time-dependent profits show that our algorithm outperforms the state of the art in terms of solution quality and computational time. When time-dependent profits are considered, our BDP-ILS algorithm performs very well on smaller instances with a known optimal solution and on larger instances compared to four reference algorithms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cor.2019.05.030

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first category of point-target mission planning methods directly treats each point target as an atomic task.

    “The first category directly treats each point target as an atomic task [2, 9-14]”

    From Integrated Imaging Mission Planning Modeling Method for Multi-Type Targets for Super-Agile Earth Observation Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 3, Problem description, says each target is modeled by multiple tasks, one for each orbit in which it can be observed. Section 3.2, Variables, likewise defines a separate task for each visible time window, contrary to treating each point target directly as one atomic task. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The first category of point-target mission planning methods can only deal with small-scale point targets and greatly increases computational complexity as the number of point targets increases.

    “The first category mission planning method can only deal with small scale point targets and greatly increases the computational complexity of the model, with a sharp increase in the number of point targets.”

    From Integrated Imaging Mission Planning Modeling Method for Multi-Type Targets for Super-Agile Earth Observation Satellite (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    Section 3.5 says the paper’s MILP network grows rapidly and can be solved to optimality only for smaller instances; Section 5.3 reports memory limits for larger instances. But the claim overgeneralizes this limitation to point-target mission planning methods: Section 5.2 reports that the paper’s heuristic handles hundreds of targets and says its computational difficulty is more closely related to overlapping time windows than to target count. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 113

Metadata

Authors
Peng, G., Dewil, R., Verbeeck, C., Gunawan, A., Xing, L., & Vansteenwegen, P.
Affiliations
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales du Nord (FR)
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Xing, Lining
Venue
Computers & Operations Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
111
Pages
84-98
ISSN
0305-0548 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2950260928
Cited by
113
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers & Operations Research (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61773120, 71501180, 71801218, U1501254)
  • China Scholarship Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
Keywords
agile Earth observation satellites, satellite scheduling, orienteering problem, time-dependent travel times, transition time, iterated local search, image quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review