The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of selective attention and speech acoustics on neural speech-tracking in a multi-talker scene
Open accessAbstract
Attending to one speaker in multi-speaker situations is challenging. One neural mechanism proposed to underlie the ability to attend to a particular speaker is phase-locking of low-frequency activity in auditory cortex to speech’s temporal envelope (“speech-tracking”), which is more precise for attended speech. However, it is not known what brings about this attentional effect, and specifically if it reflects enhanced processing of the fine structure of attended speech. To investigate this question we compared attentional effects on speech-tracking of natural vs. vocoded speech which preserves the temporal envelope but removes the fine-structure of speech. Pairs of natural and vocoded speech stimuli were presented concurrently and participants attended to one stimulus and performed a detection task while ignoring the other stimulus. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) and compared attentional effects on the speech-tracking response in auditory cortex. Speech-tracking of natural, but not vocoded, speech was enhanced by attention, whereas neural tracking of ignored speech was similar for natural and vocoded speech. These findings suggest that the more precise speech tracking of attended natural speech is related to processing its fine structure, possibly reflecting the application of higher-order linguistic processes. In contrast, when speech is unattended its fine structure is not processed to the same degree and thus elicits less precise speech tracking more similar to vocoded speech.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Entrainment of Neuronal Oscillations as a Mechanism of Attentional Selection
Lakatos, P., Karmos, G., Mehta, A. D., Ulbert, I., & Schroeder, C. E. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1154735 · Cited by 1,719
Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Emerson, R., Mehta, A. D., Simon, J. Z., et al. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037 · Cited by 909
Self-citationPredictive top-down integration of prior knowledge during speech perception
Sohoglu, E., Peelle, J. E., Carlyon, R. P., & Davis, M. H. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5069-11.2012 · Cited by 388
Transitions in neural oscillations reflect prediction errors generated in audiovisual speech
Arnal, L. H., Wyart, V., & Giraud, A.-L. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2810 · Cited by 353
Tian, X., & Poeppel, D. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00381 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Cited by
Proactive Sensing of Periodic and Aperiodic Auditory Patterns
Rimmele, J. M., Morillon, B., Poeppel, D., & Arnal, L. H. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.08.003 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Rimmele, J. M., Zion Golumbic, E., Schröger, E., & Poeppel, D.
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 68
- Pages
- 144-154
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999895062
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.