Cited by 909Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismNeural dynamics and brain function

Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a “cocktail party”

Open access
Zion Golumbic, Elana M., Ding, Nai, Bickel, Stephan, Lakatos, Peter, Schevon, Catherine A., McKhann, Guy M., Goodman, Robert R., Emerson, Ronald +4 more·2013·Neuron

Abstract

The ability to focus on and understand one talker in a noisy social environment is a critical social-cognitive capacity, whose underlying neuronal mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the manner in which speech streams are represented in brain activity and the way that selective attention governs the brain's representation of speech using a "Cocktail Party" paradigm, coupled with direct recordings from the cortical surface in surgical epilepsy patients. We find that brain activity dynamically tracks speech streams using both low-frequency phase and high-frequency amplitude fluctuations and that optimal encoding likely combines the two. In and near low-level auditory cortices, attention "modulates" the representation by enhancing cortical tracking of attended speech streams, but ignored speech remains represented. In higher-order regions, the representation appears to become more "selective," in that there is no detectable tracking of ignored speech. This selectivity itself seems to sharpen as a sentence unfolds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.12.037

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zion Golumbic, E. M., Ding, N., Bickel, S., Lakatos, P., Schevon, C. A., McKhann, G. M., Goodman, R. R., Emerson, R., Mehta, A. D., Simon, J. Z., Poeppel, D., & Schroeder, C. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
Corresponding author
Schroeder, Charles E.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
77
Issue
5
Pages
980-991
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2118980133
Cited by
909
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 1
FWCI
31.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH60358, MH086385, P50MH086385, F32MH093061, MH093061, R01MH060358)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC05660, R56DC005660, R01DC008342, R01DC012947, DC008342, R01DC005660)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
auditory selective attention, cocktail party problem, auditory cortex, epilepsy patients, speech perception in noise
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Attention, Brain, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electrodes, Implanted, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Humans, Middle Aged, Nerve Net, Neurons, Social Environment, Social Perception, Speech Perception, Reproducibility of Results, Sensory Gating, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review