Remote spatial and autobiographical memory in cases of episodic amnesia and topographical disorientation
Abstract
A number of theories have postulated that there is a strong relationship between episodic memory and spatial processes mediated by the hippocampus. Evidence for episodic amnesia following damage to the medial temporal lobes is extensive, but less is known about the types of spatial memory affected by damage to these regions. In this study, we compared episodic memory with detailed scene memory, landmark recognition and schematic (map-based) spatial memory in a group of individuals with amnesia related to damage to the medial temporal lobes (MTL) including the hippocampus. We compared their performance to matched controls, and to an individual with topographical disorientation, a selective spatial memory deficit relating to more posterior temporal and occipital lobe damage. For individuals with MTL lesions, impairments to scene memory were comparable to those in episodic memory. Landmark recognition was impaired only for less familiar landmarks, and schematic spatial memory was not impaired compared to controls. Despite the absence of hippocampal damage, the individual with topographical disorientation, like the MTL amnesic patients, demonstrated impairments to scene memory and recognition of less familiar landmarks, and intact schematic spatial memory, but with less severe episodic memory loss. These results highlight the similarities between detailed scene memory and episodic memory, including their reliance on the medial temporal lobe, and suggest that more schematic forms of spatial memory may be unaffected by medial temporal damage. In addition, the results suggest that damage to more posterior temporal or occipital regions that leads to spatial memory deficits may entail some impairment to episodic memory even if the hippocampus is spared.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In individuals with bilateral HPC damage, the gist or overall layout of a familiar environment learned before the onset of HPC damage is preserved.
“Neuropsychological evidence in individuals with bilateral HPC damage, such as K.C. described above 80 , indicates that the gist or overall layout of a familiar environment learned before the onset of HPC damage is preserved 3,[80][81][82][122][123][124] , whereas memory for details or surface properties is lost [80][81][82]123,124 .”
From From cognitive maps to spatial schemas (2023) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Robin, J., Rivest, J., Rosenbaum, R. S., & Moscovitch, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- York University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Robin, Jessica
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 119
- Pages
- 237-257
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946656702
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Alzheimer Society
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- episodic memory, spatial memory, autobiographical memory, topographical disorientation, hippocampus, scene memory, landmark detection, posterior temporal lobe, occipital lobe, memory dissociation
- MeSH terms
- Amnesia, Confusion, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Middle Aged, Mental Recall, Recognition, Psychology, Memory, Episodic, Spatial Memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review