Assessing long-term forgetting: A pragmatic approach
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intermittent retrieval is one factor that critically determines the slope of memory retention across time.
“One factor that critically determines the slope of memory retention across time is intermittent retrieval20.”
From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The resulting nonlinear forgetting curve for all spatial representations in the study resembles power functions from classical memory experiments such as the Ebbinghaus experiments.
“The resulting nonlinear forgetting curve for all spatial representations in our study resembles power functions from classical memory experiments such as the Ebbinghaus experiments17,18,20.”
From Long-term Memory Reorganization of Navigational Episodes (2026) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 67 · Cited by 9
- Authors
- Della Sala, S., Baddeley, A., Peng, N., & Logie, R.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Venue
- Cortex
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 170
- Pages
- 80-89
- ISSN
- 0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389071087
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 67
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- long-term forgetting, memory retention
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Mental Recall, Memory, Long-Term
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
