User perceptions of security, convenience and usability for ebanking authentication tokens
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior work has shown that lack of clarity about the functionality and security benefits of authentication methods leads to lower security ratings, lower acceptance, and reluctance to switch to a new authentication method.
“Prior work has shown that lack of clarity about the functionality and security benefits of authentication methods leads to lower security ratings, lower acceptance, and reluctance to switch to a new authentication method [34], [33], [55], [26].”
From Is FIDO2 the Kingslayer of User Authentication? A Comparative Usability Study of FIDO2 Passwordless Authentication (2020) · cites this paper as [33]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ghorbani Lyastani, S., Schilling, M., Neumayr, M., Backes, M., & Bugiel, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40000.2020.00047 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Tale of Two Studies: The Best and Worst of YubiKey Usability
Reynolds, J., Smith, T., Reese, K., Dickinson, L., Ruoti, S., & Seamons, K. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp.2018.00067 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Wi-Sign: Device-free Second Factor User Authentication
Shah, S. W., & Kanhere, S. S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 15th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services · doi:10.1145/3286978.3286994 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Weir, C. S., Douglas, G., Carruthers, M., & Jack, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Weir, Catherine S.
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 47-62
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018899557
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 18.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
- Keywords
- two-factor authentication, authentication tokens, security-usability trade-off, perceived security, convenience, usability, user preferences, usage logs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
