Best: blockchain-based secure energy trading in SDN enabled intelligent transportation system
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A centralized SDN controller is vulnerable to various cyberattacks including DoS and single point of failure attacks.
“This centralized SDN controller is vulnerable to various cyberattacks including DoS, and single point of failure attacks [158].”
From A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions (2021) · cites this paper as [158]
The blue cluster revolves around the potentials of blockchain solutions for smart communities, energy trading, transportation, artificial intelligence, and construction.
“Furthermore, the blue cluster revolves around the potentials of blockchain solutions for smart communities (Aggarwal et al. 2019), energy trading (Chaudhary et al. 2019; Jindal et al. 2019), transportation (Astarita et al. 2020; Mehta et al. 2020; Sharma and Park 2018), artificial intelligence (Singh et al. 2019, 2020a, b), and construction (Sun and Zhang 2020).”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Chaudhary et al. 2019
Blockchain acts as an innovative and effective safeguard to the privacy of transactions due to its authentication and encryption mechanisms.
“According to several studies, blockchain acts as an innovative and effective safeguard to the privacy of transactions due to its authentication and encryption mechanisms (Altulyan et al. 2020; Chaudhary et al. 2019; Khan et al. 2020; Nam et al. 2019; Treiblmaier et al. 2020).”
From Blockchain technology in the smart city: A bibliometric review (2022) · cites this paper as Chaudhary et al. 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 276
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Q. Feng, D. He, S. Zeadally, M. K. Khan, N. Kumar, A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 126 (2019) 45 -58.
- Authors
- Chaudhary, R., Jindal, A., Aujla, G. S., Aggarwal, S., Kumar, N., & Choo, K.-K. R.
- Affiliations
- Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology (IN)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Chandigarh University (IN)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Choo, Kim-Kwang Raymond
- ORCID
- Venue
- Computers & Security
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 288-299
- ISSN
- 0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946273902
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 57.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.lancs.ac.uk
- Locations
- Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- blockchain, energy trade, electric vehicles, software-defined networking, intelligent transportation systems, tactile internet, smart grid, dynamic pricing, smart cities, low latency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
