A survey on the adoption of blockchain in IoT: challenges and solutions
Open accessAbstract
Conventional Internet of Things (IoT) ecosystems involve data streaming from sensors, through Fog devices to a centralized Cloud server. Issues that arise include privacy concerns due to third party management of Cloud servers, single points of failure, a bottleneck in data flows and difficulties in regularly updating firmware for millions of smart devices from a point of security and maintenance perspective. Blockchain technologies avoid trusted third parties and safeguard against a single point of failure and other issues. This has inspired researchers to investigate blockchain’s adoption into IoT ecosystem. In this paper, recent state-of-the-arts advances in blockchain for IoT, blockchain for Cloud IoT and blockchain for Fog IoT in the context of eHealth, smart cities, intelligent transport and other applications are analyzed. Obstacles, research gaps and potential solutions are also presented.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey reviews blockchain adoption in IoT, Cloud of Things, Fog of Things, and SDN across eHealth, smart cities/home, intelligent transport, and other applications, cataloguing challenges and potential solutions. It finds blockchain can address privacy, single-point-of-failure, bottleneck, and trust issues, but resource, throughput, storage, privacy-transparency, and regulatory obstacles remain.
Key findings
- The survey identifies six main adoption challenges: power/performance/security trade-off, data concurrency and throughput, IoT connectivity, big-data storage, transparency vs privacy, and regulation. It cites that a blockchain node would need approximately 730 GB/year if 1000 participants exchange one 2 MB image per day, and notes anticipation of more than 50 billion connected devices by 2020.
- It reviews consensus mechanisms and blockchain types, noting Bitcoin’s 12.5 bitcoins per block at one block per 10 min, PoW energy consumption compared with Ireland, Austria, and Colombia, and that Ethereum business process execution can cost two orders of magnitude more than Amazon SWF.
- Proposed solutions include smart agents/gateways, sharding, sidechains, off-chain storage, homomorphic encryption, proxy re-encryption, federated learning, and regulation combining law, social norms, and economic means.
- Application review covers eHealth, smart cities/home, vehicular networks, and miscellaneous IoT; blockchain roles include access control, data sharing, authentication, trust, payment, and supply chain. Many reviewed works are conceptual or lack performance/security evaluation; the majority of included studies were published in 2019, with the largest share from IEEE Xplore.
Methods
- Design: narrative survey/review of recent state-of-the-art advances in blockchain for IoT, Cloud IoT, Fog IoT, and SDN, covering eHealth, smart cities, intelligent transport, and other applications.
- Data: literature searched with keywords including blockchain and IoT, healthcare, Fog, Cloud, and Agent; downloaded from IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Elsevier, ACM, Springer, MDPI, and SAGE. Statistics show the largest percentage from IEEE Xplore, second-highest from Elsevier journals, and the majority published in 2019.
- Analysis: reviewed studies against attributes including blockchain type, consensus mechanism, access control, scalability, on-chain/off-chain storage, tools/simulators, contributions/outcomes, and limitations/remarks; challenges and solutions are synthesized in tables and figures.
Limitations
- The paper does not state its own limitations explicitly. It states that current blockchain platforms have scalability limitations, high computational cost, security/privacy issues, and regulatory challenges, and it repeatedly notes that many reviewed blockchain-IoT proposals are conceptual, not implemented, or lack performance/security evaluation.
- Evident from the text: the survey is narrative rather than a systematic review with a formal search/selection protocol; it relies on selected databases and keyword searches, and its statistics are descriptive (publisher/year/application counts) without meta-analysis.
- Evident from the text: coverage is broad but uneven; some sections and tables are incomplete or rely on author-reported weaknesses, and the survey does not independently validate the reviewed systems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 190 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
A centralized repository drawback is that customers cannot access services during single server failure.
“(1) Since a single server is meant to deal with all kinds of customers' queries, customers would not be able to access services during the period of failure [151].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [151] Kessler, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A centralized repository drawback is that the database can be changed from the server-side without the data owner having control or knowledge of the changes.
“(3) The database can be changed from the server-side without the data owner having control or knowledge of the changes in the database [7,153].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Michelin, 2018, Speedychain: a framework for decoupling data from blockchain for smart cities
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [153] Fan, 2018, Investigating blockchain as a data management tool for IoT devices in smart city initiatives
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
A centralized repository drawback is the risk of violating the data owner's privacy because unencrypted data might be exposed to unauthorized individuals by the entity administering the centralized storage medium.
“(2) There is a risk of violating the data owner's privacy because unencrypted data might be exposed to unauthorized individuals by the entity that administers the centralized storage medium [152].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [152] Constine, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In Kang et al.'s scheme, performance assessments have not been carried out.
“However, performance assessments for the proposed scheme has not been carried out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [170] Kang, 2018, Recent patient health monitoring platforms incorporating internet of things-enabled smart devices, Int. Neurourol. J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
In Celesti et al.'s eHealth system, extensive performance analysis has not been carried out to demonstrate feasibility.
“Although the authors described the healthcare workflow for the proposed system, extensive performance analysis has not been carried out to demonstrate the feasibility of the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [166] Celesti, 2020, Blockchain-based healthcare workflow for tele-medical laboratory in federated hospital IoT clouds, Sensors source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The drawback of the Peru blockchain-based private health purchase management system is that data confidentiality has not been addressed.
“The drawback of the proposed scheme is that data confidentiality has not been addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [87] Celiz, 2018, Cloud model for purchase management in health sector of Peru based on IoT and blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
Most research presented in Tables 8 and 9 has addressed the storage cost issue on the blockchain network by following the off-chain database approach.
“Most research presented in Tables 8 and 9 has addressed the storage cost issue on the blockchain network by following the off-chain database approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
In Ichikawa et al.'s framework, security issues between sensors and mobile App have not been addressed.
“However, security issues between sensors, mobile App have not been addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [175] Ichikawa, 2017, Tamper-resistant mobile health using blockchain technology, JMIR mHealth and uHealth source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Research has investigated blockchain as a promising solution to the service outsourcing challenges such as security, privacy, payment and contract.
“Research [93,94,193] has investigated blockchain as a promising solution to the service outsourcing challenges such as security, privacy, payment and contract.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [93] Cao, 2019, Cloud-assisted secure ehealth systems for tamper-proofing EHR via blockchain, Inf. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] Park, 2018, Corus: blockchain-based trustworthy evaluation system for efficacy of healthcare remedies
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [193] Zhu, 2019, zkCrowd: a hybrid blockchain-based crowdsourcing platform, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Kazmi et al.'s blockchain-based remote patient monitoring system ignored security and privacy issues while retrieving data from wearable sensors.
“However, the security and privacy issues while retrieving data from wearable sensors were ignored.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] Kazmi, 2019, Trusted remote patient monitoring using blockchain-based smart contracts
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Ramani et al.'s medical data accessibility approach on the blockchain did not evaluate performance using any simulator or by building a prototype.
“However, the authors did not evaluate the performance of the proposed technique using any simulator or by building a prototype.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [179] Ramani, 2018, Secure and efficient data accessibility in blockchain based healthcare systems
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Cao et al.'s Cloud assisted eHealth framework using blockchain to secure outsourcing EHRs has not investigated a smart contract for managing service.
“However, a smart contract for managing service has not been investigated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [93] Cao, 2019, Cloud-assisted secure ehealth systems for tamper-proofing EHR via blockchain, Inf. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [94] Park, 2018, Corus: blockchain-based trustworthy evaluation system for efficacy of healthcare remedies
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Dwivedi et al.'s decentralized blockchain data security scheme has not had actual simulations rendered.
“The weakness of the article is that actual simulations have not been rendered on the suggested security scheme.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [91] Dwivedi, 2019, A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT, Sensors source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Chen et al.'s searchable encryption supported healthcare framework using blockchain did not demonstrate how blockchain based searchable encryption improved over the conventional.
“How blockchain based searchable encryption improved over the conventional was not demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Chen, 2019, Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Dorri et al.'s smart home architecture has not had blockchain for the system implemented.
“However, the shortcoming of the proposed scheme is that blockchain for the system has not been implemented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [219] Dorri, 2017, Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: the case study of a smart home
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Yang et al.'s Proof of Familiarity consensus mechanism for eHealth blockchain has not had a prototype implemented to study feasibility.
“The shortcoming of the paper is that prototype is yet to be implemented to study the feasibility of the proposed consensus mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [201] Yang, 2019, Proof-of-familiarity: a privacy-preserved blockchain scheme for collaborative medical decision-making, Appl. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Ismail et al.'s lightweight blockchain healthcare architecture cannot guarantee the tamper-proof of the ledger.
“The customized blockchain can reduce computational and communication delay but can not guarantee the tamper-proof of the ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [198] Ismail, 2019, Lightweight blockchain for healthcare, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Akkaoui et al.'s hybrid Edge blockchain-based eHealth architecture using an extra global blockchain can increase the latency of processing blocks.
“used an extra global blockchain that can increase the latency of processing blocks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [84] Akkaoui, 2020, A hybrid edge blockchain-based framework for health data exchange, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
In both approaches, IoT systems are not directly connected to the peer nodes of the blockchain network.
“In both approaches, IoT systems are not directly connected to the peer nodes of the blockchain network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Blockchain's peer-to-peer architecture is regarded as a possible solution to problems with a single point of failure and bottleneck.
“The blockchain's peer to peer (P2P) architecture is regarded as a possible solution to problems with a single point of failure and bottleneck [11,12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
A blockchain node would need approximately 730 GB of data storage per year if 1000 participants exchange a single 2 MB image per day in a blockchain application.
“The study in Ref. [22] calculated that a blockchain node would need approximately 730 GB of data storage per year if 1000 participants exchange a single 2 MB image per day in a blockchain application.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] Kyle, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
User's confidentiality may be adversely affected when storing and accessing IoT data from certain IoT systems such as eHealth on the blockchain.
“However, user's confidentiality may be adversely affected when storing and accessing IoT data from certain IoT systems such as eHealth on the blockchain [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] Yu, 2019, Blockchain technology for the 5G—enabled internet of things systems: principle, applications and challenges
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Blockchain's complexity, including high computing costs and delays, is a challenge in the amalgamation of blockchain with IoT that have restricted power and storage capacities.
“However, blockchain's complexity, including high computing costs and delays, is a challenge in the amalgamation of blockchain with IoT that have restricted power and storage capacities [15].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15] Özyılmaz, 2017, Work-in-progress: integrating low-power IoT devices to a blockchain-based infrastructure
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: The high computational power required to run blockchain algorithms has slowed down the advancement of these technology-based applications on resource constrained devices.
- Interpretationreasoning
Aggregate signatures can address the issue of limited storage and bandwidth.
“Consequently, aggregate signatures can address the issue of limited storage and bandwidth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Boneh, 2011, Aggregate signatures
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The management of IoT data on the blockchain puts a burden on participants' storage space.
“the management of IoT data on the blockchain puts a burden on participants' storage space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Blockchain features including decentralization, immutability, anonymity, and automation, when combined, pose various new regulatory challenges.
“While several blockchain technological features including decentralization, immutability, anonymity, and automation are promising security solutions for diverse IoT applications, these features combined pose various new regulatory challenges [24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Ellul, 2020, Regulating blockchain, dlt and smart contracts: a technology regulator's perspective, ERA Forum source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Due to the absence of governance, records cannot be filtered for maintaining privacy before publishing them on the blockchain.
- Rests on an assumption: Actions resulting from executing code such as smart contracts on a DTL can breach law.
- Rests on an assumption: Due to the anonymity of the DTL, it is not so straightforward to distinguish the parties carrying out transactions for illegal services.
- Premisenone given
With pBFT, communication overhead exponentially increases for each additional node that joins the network.
“communication overhead exponentially increases for each additional node that joins the network”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Practical BFT is prone to Sybil attacks.
“practical BFT is prone to Sybil attacks (one participant maintains many identifiers that can influence this mechanism) [66].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [66] Gramoli, 2017, From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (pBFT) effectively works well in distributed networks with a limited number of nodes.
“Practical BFT effectively works well in distributed networks with a limited number of nodes”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Proof of Bandwidth can resist attacks that are occurred by malicious nodes' colluding.
“This approach can resist attacks that are occurred by malicious nodes' colluding [71].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Ghosh, 2014, A torpath to torcoin: proof-of-bandwidth altcoins for compensating relays
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
In Proof of Bandwidth, malicious nodes can falsely report their bandwidths.
“However, malicious nodes can falsely report their bandwidths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Proof of Authentication is deemed as appropriate consensus protocol in IoT as it avoids the inverse hash computation for energy-efficient distributed secure communications and computing in IoT.
“Proof of Authentication is deemed as appropriate consensus protocol in IoT as it avoids the inverse hash computation for energy-efficient distributed secure communications and computing in IoT [74].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Puthal, 2019, Proof-of-authentication for scalable blockchain in resource-constrained distributed systems
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Proof of Elapsed Time (PoET) is much more energy-efficient than other consensus protocols such as PoW.
“This approach is much more energy-efficient than other consensus protocols such as PoW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The availability or security of the network cannot be compromised even if some of the nodes go offline.
“The availability or security of the network cannot be compromised even if some of the nodes go offline.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Blockchain, with its decentralized nature, is a promising technique for effectively solving bottleneck and one-point failure problems by eliminating the need for a trusted third party in the IoT network.
“blockchain, with its decentralized nature, is a promising technique for effectively solving bottleneck and one-point failure problems by eliminating the need for a trusted third party in the IoT network [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yu, 2018, Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The transaction histories in blockchain are more transparent since these histories are available to all network users.
“The transaction histories in blockchain are more transparent since these histories are available to all network users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The disruption of a blockchain node does not affect the operation of the blockchain and IoT network.
“The disruption of a blockchain node does not affect the operation of the blockchain and IoT network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Blockchain is more reliable and secure than other record-keeping systems from several aspects.
“Enhanced Security: blockchain is more reliable and secure than other record-keeping systems from several aspects [8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yu, 2018, Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
With blockchain-enabled smart contracts, blockchain and IoT can provide consumers with trusted access control, which automatically authorize all operations of IoT devices.
“Further, with blockchain-enabled smart contracts [141], blockchain and IoT can provide consumers with trusted access control, which automatically authorize all operations of IoT devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [141] Hu, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given
Due to constraints in block size, many blockchains have lengthy processing periods for transactions to be written into the chain of previously confirmed blocks.
“Currently, due to constraints in block size, many blockchains have lengthy processing periods for transactions to be written into the chain of previously confirmed blocks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The cryptographic link between subsequent blocks can withstand any attempts of transactions' alteration or modification.
“The cryptographic link between subsequent blocks can withstand any attempts of transactions' alteration or modification.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The magnitude of IoT data would grow rapidly, making the processing of high volumes of data complicated in the blockchain.
“Thus, the magnitude of IoT data would grow rapidly, making the processing of high volumes of data complicated in the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Such transparency also leads to protecting the credibility of the blockchain-based systems by reducing the possibility of unauthorized data alternations.
“Such transparency also leads to protecting the credibility of the blockchain-based systems by reducing the possibility of unauthorized data alternations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Current blockchain platforms have some bottlenecks that result in poor scalability with restricted throughput, efficiency and high computational cost.
“Current blockchain platforms have some bottlenecks that result in poor scalability with restricted throughput, efficiency and high computational cost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Thanks to blockchain's immutable and trustworthy features, storage systems on the blockchain are extremely efficient to protect IoT data from alteration.
“Thanks to blockchain's immutable and trustworthy features, storage systems on the blockchain are extremely efficient to protect IoT data from alteration [19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Dwivedi, 2019, Optimized blockchain model for Internet of Things based healthcare applications
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Even if any changes occur in a transaction, it will be easily identified.
“Even if any changes occur in a transaction, it will be easily identified.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Many applications developers don't see blockchain technology as an alternative solution to the existing systems for large IoT systems.
“Due to these limitations, many applications developers don't see blockchain technology as an alternative solution to the existing systems for large IoT systems [145].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [145] Kim, 2018, A survey of scalability solutions on blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The block data cannot be updated, altered or removed after it is validated and recorded in the blockchain.
“This way, the block data cannot be updated, altered or removed after it is validated and recorded in the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These steps combinedly consume considerable computing power.
“These steps combinedly consume considerable computing power.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
If all transactions are saved on the chain, the ledger over time will become extremely large.
“If all transactions are saved on the chain, the ledger over time will become extremely large [144].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [144] Lin, 2018, The challenges of existence, status, and value for improving blockchain, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Due to resource constraints of IoT systems, it is difficult for them to meet resource requirements of PoW for qualifying the most decentralized nature.
“Due to resource constraints of IoT systems, it is difficult for them to meet resource requirements of PoW for qualifying the most decentralized nature.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Blockchain technology with high immutable, stable, and trustworthy features can tackle the challenges raised while sharing health information in Cloud ecosystems.
“Blockchain technology with high immutable, stable, and trustworthy features can tackle the challenges raised while sharing health information in Cloud ecosystems [150].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [150] Jin, 2019, A review of secure and privacy-preserving medical data sharing, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Integration of blockchain into Cloud computing significantly increases security for storage services in Cloud eHealth.
“Integration of blockchain into Cloud computing significantly increases security for storage services in Cloud eHealth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recently, researchers have sought blockchain technology to integrate into decentralized SDN IoT framework to ensure uniform state among instances of the SDN controller.
“Recently, researchers [159,160] have sought blockchain technology to integrate into decentralized SDN IoT framework to ensure uniform state among the instances of the SDN controller.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [159] Sharma, 2017, Distblocknet: a distributed blockchains-based secure SDN architecture for IoT networks, IEEE Commun. Mag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [160] Sharma, 2018, Softedgenet: SDN based energy-efficient distributed network architecture for edge computing, IEEE Commun. Mag. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Centralised Cloud services can cause delays and performance problems for IoT devices that are far from the Cloud data centre.
“Although the Cloud allows users' access to storage, processing and networking resources in cost-effective ways, these centralised services can cause delays and performance problems for IoT devices that are far from the Cloud data centre.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
PoW is not appropriate for Fog miners because it solves a complex mathematical puzzle requiring massive computational capacity and power.
“For instance, PoW that solves a complex mathematical puzzle requiring massive computational capacity and power, is not appropriate for Fog miners [156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [156] Kumar, 2019, Proof-of-work consensus approach in blockchain technology for cloud and fog computing using maximization-factorization statistics, IEEE Internet of Things J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Edge/Fog computing can reduce the amount of data uploaded to remote Cloud servers.
“Consequently, this technology can reduce the amount of data uploaded to the remote Cloud servers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
A full-featured blockchain cannot be implemented on Fog nodes due to their restricted storage and computing resources, wide distribution, heterogeneous network, and nodes' selfish behaviour.
“However, a full-featured blockchain cannot be implemented on the Fog nodes due to their restricted storage and computing resources, wide distribution, heterogeneous network, and nodes' selfish behaviour [155].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [155] Wang, 2019, Blockchain-based resource allocation model in fog computing, Appl. Sci. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
A centralized SDN controller is vulnerable to various cyberattacks including DoS and single point of failure attacks.
“This centralized SDN controller is vulnerable to various cyberattacks including DoS, and single point of failure attacks [158].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [158] Chaudhary, 2019, Best: blockchain-based secure energy trading in SDN enabled intelligent transportation system, Comput. Secur. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Cloud computing alone finds it challenging to handle the flood of information with the proliferation of IoT devices and their constant interactions.
“Cloud computing alone finds it challenging to handle the flood of information with the proliferation of IoT devices and their constant interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A technology like blockchain is required to maintain trust in a distributed Fog network where participants do not need to trust one another.
“Therefore, a technology like blockchain is required to maintain trust in a distributed Fog network where participants don't need to trust one another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Patients need to perform the same test twice when they switch to different physicians.
“Consequently, patients need to perform the same test twice when they switch to different physicians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Blockchain can provide an integrated solution for avoiding counterfeited drugs by making the entire drug distribution network traceable to all stakeholders at any point in the supply chain.
“Blockchain can provide an integrated solution for avoiding counterfeited drugs by making the entire drug distribution network traceable to all stakeholders at any point in the supply chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Blockchain has enormous potential to secure pharmaceutical supply chains.
“Blockchain has an enormous potential to secure pharmaceutical supply chains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Blockchain has appeared as a potential solution to the issue of protecting patient privacy while exchanging EHRs because of its decentralization and manipulation resistance characteristics.
“Blockchain has appeared as a potential solution to this issue because of its decentralization and manipulation resistance characteristics [185].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [185] Liu, 2019, A blockchain-based medical data sharing and protection scheme, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The security of eHealth systems is a vital issue because a security breach can endanger a patient's privacy, health, or even life by maliciously altering diagnostic data.
“The security of eHealth systems is a vital issue because a security breach can endanger a patient's privacy, health, or even his or her life by maliciously altering diagnostic data [176].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [176] Kahani, 2016, Authentication and access control in e-health systems in the cloud
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The efficiency of accessing these data on the Cloud depends on the mechanism of encryption approach.
“The efficiency of accessing these data on the Cloud depends on the mechanism of encryption approach [203].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [203] Li, 2019, Blockchain-based searchable symmetric encryption scheme, Comput. Electr. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Fog computing brings concerns regarding heterogeneous platform, security, privacy, trust, and resource management.
“However, Fog computing brings concerns regarding heterogeneous platform, security, privacy, trust, and resource management [209].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [209] A.A. Mutlag, M.K. Abd Ghani, N.A. Arunkumar, et al. Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Generat. Comput. Syst.. 90: 62–78.. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Blockchain implementation requires immense computational power thanks to its mathematical principles such as cryptographic key systems, the Merkle Hash Tree and PoW.
“Blockchain implementation requires immense computational power thanks to its mathematical principles such as cryptographic key systems, the Merkle Hash Tree and PoW [197].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [197] Liu, 2019, A lightweight blockchain system for industrial internet of things, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Searchable encryption (SE) which is a promising encryption technique guarantees data security, without compromising data searchability.
“Searchable encryption (SE) which is a promising encryption technique guarantees data security, without compromising data searchability [96].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Chen, 2019, Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
As a result, a lot of transactions remain within the local network that blockchain would have to globally process.
“As a result, a lot of transactions remain within the local network that blockchain would have to globally process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
However, this approach is not appropriate for transaction validation in time-sensitive service-oriented time tasks because the timesensitive services might be impacted by long latency.
“However, this approach is not appropriate for transaction validation in time-sensitive service-oriented time tasks because the timesensitive services might be impacted by long latency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
IoT devices cannot directly host blockchain technology due to their limited processing and memory capacities.
“IoT devices cannot directly host blockchain technology due to their limited processing and memory capacities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Users are not always in a position to manage the influx of data generated by IoT ecosystems.
“Users are not always in a position to manage this influx of data [277].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [277] Verame, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Therefore, the software agent requires to be executed on Edge or Cloud servers that facilitate distributed environments.
“Therefore, the software agent requires to be executed on Edge or Cloud servers that facilitate distributed environments [287].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [287] Uddin, 2019, A decentralized patient agent controlled blockchain for remote patient monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Cha et al.'s research has been limited to addressing the user's privacy concerns.
“However, the research has been limited to address the user's privacy concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
If the Gateway device containing the agent is stolen or hacked, operations of multiple IoT devices attached to the Gateway may be affected and come under various potential malicious attacks.
“If the Gateway device containing the agent is stolen or hacked, operations of multiple IoT devices attached to the Gateway may be affected and come under various potential malicious attacks [286].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [286] Tuli, 2019, Next generation technologies for smart healthcare: challenges, vision, model, trends and future directions, Internet Technol. Lett. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Implementing a software agent on smartphone or Gateway devices is hard as these devices may be linked to multiple IoT devices and sensors.
“However, implementing a software agent on the smartphone or Gateway devices is hard as these devices may be linked to multiple IoT devices and sensors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The resource requirements for mining blocks on the P2P blockchain network outweigh the capabilities of resource-constrained IoT devices.
“The resource requirements for mining blocks on the P2P blockchain network outweigh the capabilities of resource-constrained IoT devices.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
IoT devices are equipped with limited bandwidth capabilities.
“IoT devices are equipped with limited bandwidth capabilities [288].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [288] Dai, 2019, Blockchain for internet of things: a survey, IEEE Internet of Things J. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Inclusion of the Patient Centric Agent [239] with an eHealth framework can reduce the bandwidth requirements.
“Thus, the inclusion of Patient Centric Agent [239] with eHealth framework can reduce the bandwidth requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [239] Uddin, 2018, Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: a block architecture, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
When the Patient Centric Agent creates blocks, a significant number of transactions do not propagate throughout the P2P blockchain network.
“In this case, a significant number of transactions do not propagate throughout the P2P blockchain network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The bandwidth required to operate blockchain may exceed the upper thresholds of Edge servers.
“However, the bandwidth required to operate blockchain may exceed the upper thresholds of Edge servers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
With the growing spread of IoT, the centralised IoT network structure poses the threat of numerous security vulnerabilities including data forgery, manipulation, and unauthorized access to devices by targeting Gateway services.
“With the growing spread of IoT, the centralised IoT network structure poses the threat of numerous security vulnerabilities including data forgery, manipulation, and unauthorized access to devices by targeting Gateway services [290].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [290] Gu, 2018, Location data record privacy protection based on differential privacy mechanism, Inf. Technol. Contr.
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The work in Ref. [47] decentralized the Patient Centric Agent through replicating the agent at Smartphone in Body Area Sensor Networks, Near processing layer (Fog level), and Far processing layer (Cloud level).
“The work in Ref. [47] decentralized the Patient Centric Agent through replicating the agent at Smartphone in Body Area Sensor Networks, Near processing layer (Fog level), and Far processing layer (Cloud level).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Uddin, 2020, Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework, Internet of Things source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The nature of blockchain networks theoretically makes IoT devices more susceptible to security attacks.
“This nature of the blockchain networks theoretically makes IoT devices higher susceptible to security attacks [2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] Ellouze, 2020, Blockchain for internet of medical things: a technical review
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Storing all health data on the chain for many patients is challenged by the blockchain structure.
“Storing all health data on the chain for many patients is challenged with blockchain structure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Patient monitoring systems continuously stream health data and transactions are more frequently created in such applications.
- Premisecitation
Uddin et al. [17] contributed to the creation of a system to track smart homes or cities securely using blockchain technology.
“Uddin et al. [17] contributed to the creation of a system to track smart homes or cities securely using blockchain technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Uddin, 2019, An efficient selective miner consensus protocol in blockchain oriented IoT smart monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The end of the patient in the system of Ref. [239] is often vulnerable to significant cyberattacks such as single point failure and denial of service.
“As a result, the end of the patient is often vulnerable to significant cyberattacks such as single point failure and denial of service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
eHealth applications significantly differ from cryptocurrencies in the level of storage requirements.
“However, eHealth applications significantly differ from cryptocurrencies in the level of storage requirements [292].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [292] Krishnan, 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The integration of homomorphic encryption with blockchain-based eHealth can potentially protect a patient's privacy in a decentralized model.
“The integration of homomorphic encryption with blockchain-based eHealth can potentially protect a patient's privacy in a decentralized model [282].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [282] Shrestha, 2019, Integration of IoT with blockchain and homomorphic encryption: challenging issues and opportunities, Adv. Comput. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Information processing on blockchain nodes encounters the risk of leakage of data because plaintext data is shared and accessed with many nodes.
“Information processing on the blockchain nodes encounters the risk of leakage of data as plaintext data is shared and accessed with many nodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The combination of blockchain technology and federated machine learning can facilitate decentralized COVID-19 tracing applications without the need of centralised authority that can collect and share user's information with privacy and security.
“However, the combination of blockchain technology and federated machine learning [294] can facilitate decentralized COVID-19 tracing applications without the need of centralised authority that can collect and share user's information with privacy and security.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [294] Hard, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 271
- May combine two claims. 119
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe cost of execution of the business process on Ethereum blockchain could be two orders of magnitude greater than on Amazon SWF.
“Rimba et al. [120] reported that the cost of execution of the business process on Ethereum blockchain could be two orders of magnitude greater than on Amazon SWF.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] Rimba, 2020, Quantifying the cost of distrust: comparing blockchain and cloud services for business process execution, Inf. Syst. Front source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDue to restricted power and storage resources of IoT devices, vast amounts of data streamed from many devices creates a bottleneck for current IoT systems, resulting in low QoS.
“Due to the restricted power and storage resources of IoT devices, vast amounts of data streamed from many devices creates a bottleneck for the current IoT systems, which results in low QoS [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yu, 2018, Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Nguyen et al.'s framework, scalability and communication cost issues of the blockchain were not investigated.
“However, scalability and communication cost issue of the blockchain were not investigated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [169] Nguyen, 2019, A mobile cloud based IoMT framework for automated health assessment and management
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe largest percentages of research papers reviewed were retrieved from IEEE Xplore, while the second-highest percentages were collected from various Journals of Elsevier publisher.
“The graph depicted in Fig. 19(a) shows that the largest percentages of research papers have been retrieved from IEEE Xplore, while the second-highest percentages of publications have been collected from various Journals of Elsevier publisher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe majority of studies included in the paper were published in 2019.
“The majority of studies included in the paper were published in 2019.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Ni et al.'s work, the authors did not describe which kinds of simulation tools or programming language were used to conduct performance analysis.
“However, the authors did not describe which kinds of simulation tools or programming language was used to conduct performance analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [174] Ni, 2019, Healchain: a decentralized data management system for mobile healthcare using consortium blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe weakness of Ref. [90] is that a smart contract for managing data storage has not been implemented.
“The weakness of the article is that a smart contract for managing data storage has not been implemented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] Al Omar, 2019, Privacy-friendly platform for healthcare data in cloud based on blockchain environment, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenLiang et al. overlooked security issues such as malicious attacks on IoT devices.
“However, they overlooked security issues such as malicious attacks on IoT devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [173] Liang, 2017, Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe drawbacks of Wang et al.'s research are that data security and the delay arising from ABE and access control approach were not analyzed.
“However, the drawbacks of the research is that data security and the delay arising from ABE and access control approach were not analyzed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [83] Wang, 2018, A blockchain-based framework for data sharing with fine-grained access control in decentralized storage systems, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Wang et al.'s article, a blockchain prototype has not been implemented.
“However, blockchain prototype has not been implemented in the article.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [180] Wang, 2018, Secure cloud-based EHR system using attribute-based cryptosystem and blockchain, J. Med. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationIn Ref. [88], a real prototype of the framework is yet to be implemented.
“However, a real prototype of the framework is yet to be implemented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [88] Liu, 2018, BPDS: a blockchain based privacy-preserving data sharing for electronic medical records
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe limitation of Ref. [89] is that comparisons have not been made between smart contract-based schemes and traditional schemes, and the model was not implemented to analyze performances.
“The limitation of the work is that comparisons have not been made between smart contract-based schemes and traditional schemes, and the model was not implemented to analyze performances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [89] Kaur, 2018, A proposed solution and future direction for blockchain-based heterogeneous medicare data in cloud environment, J. Med. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningTo achieve a secure and efficient keyword search in the healthcare system, researchers have suggested merging blockchain technology with a traditional Cloud storage system.
“To achieve a secure and efficient keyword search in the healthcare system, researchers have suggested merging blockchain technology with a traditional Cloud storage system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningTo answer these issues, blockchain technology has been adapted in Fog enabled healthcare systems.
“To answer these issues, blockchain technology has been adapted in Fog enabled healthcare systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationZheng et al.'s conceptual model for continuously sharing personal health data using blockchain-based decentralized Cloud storage has not had a prototype developed.
“However, a prototype of the framework is yet to be developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Zheng, 2018, Blockchain-based personal health data sharing system using cloud storage
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDaraghmi et al.'s timed smart contract-based medical record access and permission management architecture did not address security and privacy and did not access continuous health data onto the blockchain.
“However, the security and privacy was not addressed and accessing continuous health data onto the blockchain was not done.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [95] Daraghmi, 2019, Medchain: a design of blockchain-based system for medical records access and permissions management, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationIslam et al.'s HPA framework is conceptual and no performance analysis was carried out.
“However, the model is conceptual, and no performance analysis was carried out.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [178] Islam, 2018, A conceptual framework for an IoT-based health assistant and its authorization model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationPark et al.'s Cloud-based crowdsourcing medical remediation and evaluation framework CORUS has not had performance analysis of the Cloud blockchain investigated.
“The shortcoming of the article is that the performance analysis of the Cloud blockchain has not been investigated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Park, 2018, Corus: blockchain-based trustworthy evaluation system for efficacy of healthcare remedies
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe conceptual eHealth framework by Ref. [182] has not had performance analysis done.
“The limitation of the paper is that performance analysis has not been done.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [182] Zheng, 2018, Blockchain-based personal health data sharing system using cloud storage
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenMany recent studies indicate that blockchain architectures can provide seamless connectivity between clients and industrial applications in smart cities.
“Many recent studies indicate that blockchain architectures can provide seamless connectivity between clients and industrial applications in smart cities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIslam et al.'s human activity recognition platform including blockchain based Fog-Cloud computing did not describe how blockchain has been utilized and no performance analysis has been conducted regarding blockchain, Fog and Cloud platform.
“The authors did not describe how blockchain has been utilized in the proposed framework and no performance analysis has been conducted regarding blockchain, Fog and Cloud platform.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [208] Islam, 2019, A blockchain-based fog computing framework for activity recognition as an application to e-healthcare services, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationMytis et al.'s blockchain guarantee of integrity and non-repudiation of retrieval information from biomedical database did not discuss different blockchain related security attacks.
“Different blockchain related security attacks were not discussed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] Mytis-Gkometh, 2017, Notarization of knowledge retrieval from biomedical repositories using blockchain technology
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThe collaborative framework for smart cities in Ref. [106] has not had implementation of smart contract and security assessment done.
“However, the implementation of smart contract and security assessment has not been done.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [106] Yu, 2018, Decentralized big data auditing for smart city environments leveraging blockchain technology, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationMalamas et al.'s forensics enabled framework for medical devices has not had its prototype implemented.
“The prototype of the proposal was not implemented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] Malamas, 2019, A forensics-by-design management framework for medical devices based on blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationThe IoT-based smart city infrastructure in Ref. [217] has no access control designed for Cloud storage.
“However, a limitation of the work is that no access control has been designed for Cloud storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [217] Paul, 2018, IoT based secure smart city architecture using blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationCalvaresi et al.'s combination of blockchain technologies and MAS to manage reputation for Agents did not cover the performance of the blockchain.
“The performance of the blockchain was not covered in the article.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [213] Calvaresi, 2018, Multi-agent systems and blockchain: results from a systematic literature review
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenFull featured blockchain was not designed.
“Full featured blockchain was not designed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe author did not demonstrate how weight is measured for a transaction which has been left as future work.
“The author did not demonstrate how weight is measured for a transaction which has been left as future work.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenHowever, how blockchain collaborated with SDN enabled switch and controller in the Fog layer is unclear.
“However, how blockchain collaborated with SDN enabled switch and controller in the Fog layer is unclear.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenThe shortcoming of the article is that the feasibility of the proposal was not studied.
“The shortcoming of the article is that the feasibility of the proposal was not studied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe approach in Ref. [239] differs from this scheme with respect to local agents' functionalities.
“The approach in Ref. [239] differs from this scheme with respect to local agents' functionalities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis approach encounters several challenges including sustainability and security because there is no incentive mechanism to exchange information with other vehicles and there is no consensus mechanism that can increase users' level of trust.
“This approach encounters several challenges including sustainability and security because there is no incentive mechanism to exchange information with other vehicles and there is no consensus mechanism that can increase users' level of trust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenNo access control has been designed for the Cloud storage.
“No access control has been designed for the Cloud storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe setbacks of the proposal are that the security concerns for the Edge servers were not addressed and the architecture was not implemented for analysing performance.
“The setbacks of the proposal are that the security concerns for the Edge servers were not addressed and the architecture was not implemented for analysing performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThe significant contribution of the paper is that the Cloud agent collects local detection model using blockchain smart contract and form a fusion attack detection model with higher accuracy.
“The significant contribution of the paper is that the Cloud agent collects local detection model using blockchain smart contract and form a fusion attack detection model with higher accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningHowever, the challenge of this approach is to ensure that the weight on the service is honestly set because a client can falsely claim higher priority for its transactions.
“However, the challenge of this approach is to ensure that the weight on the service is honestly set because a client can falsely claim higher priority for its transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingreasoningThe basic premise of this scheme and the scheme in Ref. [239] are similar.
“The basic premise of this scheme and the scheme in Ref. [239] are similar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenHowever, how information classification was done has not been comprehensible.
“However, how information classification was done has not been comprehensible.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenTheir simulation results in the lowest cost of contact and suitable scheduling compared with other approaches to offloading.
“Their simulation results in the lowest cost of contact and suitable scheduling compared with other approaches to offloading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStoring transactions related to dynamic execution parameters increases power consumption and throughput of the task offloading approach.
“Storing transactions related to dynamic execution parameters increases power consumption and throughput of the task offloading approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe adoption of blockchain in IoT can overcome the single point of failure and serve as an adequate means to securely and efficiently store and process IoT data.
“The adoption of blockchain in IoT can overcome the single point of failure and serve as an adequate means to securely and efficiently store and process IoT data [8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] Yu, 2018, Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElimination of the blockchain PoW consensus mechanism can reduce power consumption and improve performance.
“For instance, elimination of the blockchain PoW consensus mechanism can reduce power consumption and improve performance [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Uddin, 2019, An efficient selective miner consensus protocol in blockchain oriented IoT smart monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis infrastructure guarantees stable and efficient blockchain operations with the benefits of tamper resistance and reduces single point of failure vulnerabilities.
“This infrastructure guarantees stable and efficient blockchain operations with the benefits of tamper resistance and reduces single point of failure vulnerabilities [37].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Zorzo, 2018, Dependable IoT using blockchain-based technology
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe entire Bitcoin network absorbs considerably more energy than several nations, including Austria and Colombia.
“Zhou et al. [11] reported that the entire Bitcoin network absorbs considerably more energy than several nations, including Austria and Colombia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Zhou, 2020, Solutions to scalability of blockchain: a survey, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe IoT devices are expected to be connected to high computing storage and networking resources to share IoT data with potential stakeholders.
“Connectivity challenges of IoT [20]: The IoT devices are expected to be connected to high computing storage and networking resources to share IoT data with potential stakeholders.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Atlam, 2019, Technical aspects of blockchain and IoT
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCurrent IoT laws and regulations are becoming outdated especially with the advent of new disruptive technology such as blockchain and need to be revised to undertake the DTL.
“Current IoT laws and regulations are becoming outdated especially with the advent of new disruptive technology such as blockchain and need to be revised to undertake the DTL [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Reyna, 2018, On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDecentralized storage structure improves efficiency, solves the bottleneck problem and removes the need for third-party trust.
“While this decentralized storage structure improves efficiency, solves the bottleneck problem and removes the need for third-party trust [21], the management of IoT data on the blockchain puts a burden on participants' storage space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] Karafiloski, 2017, Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: a literature review
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBitcoin's energy consumption is compared with the domestic power consumption of Ireland, which IoT devices cannot undertake.
“Bitcoin's energy consumption is compared with the domestic power consumption of Ireland, which IoT devices cannot undertake [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] O'Dwyer, 2014, Bitcoin mining and its energy footprint
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe rapid synchronization of new blocks among blockchain nodes in a chain-structured ledger requires a higher amount of bandwidth, which can improve blockchain throughput.
“The rapid synchronization of new blocks among blockchain nodes in a chain-structured ledger requires a higher amount of bandwidth, which can improve blockchain throughput [11,19].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Zhou, 2020, Solutions to scalability of blockchain: a survey, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [19] Dwivedi, 2019, Optimized blockchain model for Internet of Things based healthcare applications
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTo avoid fraud-related activities such as double-spending attacks, the trustworthiness of the block must be checked, and the data flow should be controlled to ensure the smooth exchange of information.
“To avoid fraud-related activities such as double-spending attacks, the trustworthiness of the block must be checked, and the data flow should be controlled to ensure the smooth exchange of information [63].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] Firdaus, 2019, The rise of “blockchain”: bibliometric analysis of blockchain study, Scientometrics source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn IoT systems, the IoT devices continuously stream data which results in high concurrency.
“In IoT systems, the IoT devices continuously stream data which results in high concurrency [18].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Sharma, 2020, Blockchain technology toward green IoT: opportunities and challenges, IEEE Network source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe P2P network ensures that all nodes can discover and connect each other to propagate blocks throughout the network and synchronize the valid current state of the blockchain.
“The P2P network ensures that all nodes can discover and connect each other to propagate blocks throughout the network and synchronize the valid current state of the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenFull nodes ensure that transactions and blocks are checked and validated using rules prescribed in the consensus mechanism.
“Full nodes ensure that transactions and blocks are checked and validated using rules prescribed in the consensus mechanism, which is also called mining.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProof of Authority (PoA) is applicable for private blockchain and scalable since the limited numbers of pre-approved validators.
“The PoA is applicable for private blockchain and scalable since the limited numbers of pre-approved validators.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] De Angelis, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOtherwise, either the message or signature has been altered or the digest has not been decrypted with the private key of the corresponding public key.
“Otherwise, either the message or signature has been altered or the digest has not been decrypted with the private key of the corresponding public key.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIf both digests are identical, the data has not been changed.
“If both digests are identical, the data has not been changed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenEach shard consists of its own nodes or validators that apply a PoW or staking or voting consensus mechanism.
“Each shard consists of its own nodes or validators that apply a PoW or staking or voting consensus mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSharding partitions a P2P network to improve blockchain's performance.
“Sharding [75] that partitions a P2P network is introduced to improve blockchain's performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Yu, 2020, Survey: sharding in blockchains, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEach block in the distributed ledger always has a distinctive cryptographic signature associated with a timestamp which makes the ledger auditable and unchangeable.
“In addition, each block in the distributed ledger always has a distinctive cryptographic signature associated with a timestamp which makes the ledger auditable and unchangeable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIn Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS), a group of rich nodes can dominate the network and decide who will be the witness.
“As a result, a group of rich nodes can dominate the network and decide who will be the witness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe decentralized ledger eliminates the need for the central control point, resulting in a high level of equity among the participants of the blockchain.
“This eliminates the need for the central control point, resulting in a high level of equity among the participants of the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLeased Proof of Stake (LPoS) has been suggested to overcome the drawbacks of standard PoS.
“LPoS has been suggested to overcome the drawbacks of standard PoS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [69] Hakak, 2020, Securing smart cities through blockchain technology: architecture, requirements, and challenges, IEEE Network source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenLight nodes can only store the header of the blockchain (keys) while the full nodes store the complete distributed ledger.
“Light nodes can only store the header of the blockchain (keys) while the full nodes store the complete distributed ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningA bandwidth measurement scheme is adopted to estimate the bandwidth that each participant contributes to the blockchain.
“Therefore, a bandwidth measurement scheme is adopted to estimate the bandwidth that each participant contributes to the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPublic blockchains are mostly reliable if the users strictly abide by the rules and regulations of the blockchain.
“Public blockchains are mostly reliable if the users strictly abide by the rules and regulations of the blockchain [86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Pan, 2018, Edgechain: an edge-IoT framework and prototype based on blockchain and smart contracts, IEEE Internet of Things J. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe blockchain can store and track the past records of a patient that are important for patient's care.
“Similarly, the blockchain can store and track the past records of a patient that are important for patient's care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMalicious access can be verified and disabled using smart contract-based authorisation.
“Malicious access can be verified and disabled using smart contract-based authorisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBlockchain data is usually stored in multiple nodes on the P2P network, and the system is highly resistant to technological failures and malicious attacks.
“Blockchain data is usually stored in multiple nodes on the P2P network, and the system is highly resistant to technological failures and malicious attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe validators in public blockchain are unlimited and can not be trustworthy whereas a premeditated number of validators process transactions in the private blockchain which results in higher throughput and ensure strong privacy of users' data on the private distributed ledger.
“The validators in public blockchain are unlimited and can not be trustworthy whereas a premeditated number of validators process transactions in the private blockchain which results in higher throughput and ensure strong privacy of users' data on the private distributed ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain enables users to define access rules for self-executing smart contracts, which guarantees the privacy and ownership of personal data.
“Blockchain enables users to define access rules for self-executing smart contracts, which guarantees the privacy and ownership of personal data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningA sidechain with its own protocols and implementation can independently run and is completely isolated from the main chain.
“A sidechain with its own protocols and implementation can independently run and is completely isolated from the main chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTo alter a single transaction record, all subsequent records would need to be modified and colluding would be needed for the entire network.
“To alter a single transaction record, all subsequent records would need to be modified and colluding would be needed for the entire network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningIf the main chain is hacked or compromised, the sidechain can still operate likewise, the cyberattacks on the sidechain cannot affect the operation of the main chain.
“As a result, if the main chain is hacked or compromised, the sidechain can still operate likewise, the cyberattacks on the sidechain cannot affect the operation of the main chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIf a transaction is submitted on a public blockchain, the transaction is tamper-proof and can never be altered or modified while a committed transaction can be updated in a private blockchain following consensus of a certain number of authorized participants.
“If a transaction is submitted on a public blockchain, the transaction is tamper-proof and can never be altered or modified while a committed transaction can be updated in a private blockchain following consensus of a certain number of authorized participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningInformation is stored across a network of computers rather than on a single server, which stops hackers from compromising transaction data.
“In addition to that, information is stored across a network of computers rather than on a single server, which stops hackers from compromising transaction data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSmart contract services offer data provenance to users.
“In addition, smart contract services offer data provenance to users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTo set up a network, public blockchains require no infrastructure costs, while private blockchains need wide-scale deployment and operational costs.
“To set up a network, public blockchains require no infrastructure costs, while private blockchains need wide-scale deployment and operational costs [119].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [119] Yang, 2020, Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration, Autom. ConStruct. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGoods traded in a complex supply chain using a traditional ledger cannot be traced back to their point of origin as quickly in other systems as in blockchain.
“Goods traded in a complex supply chain using a traditional ledger cannot be traced back to their point of origin as quickly in other systems as in blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAnother important blockchain type is called consortium blockchain, which is a semi-decentralized and governed by a group rather than a single entity.
“Another important blockchain type is called consortium blockchain, which is a semi-decentralized and governed by a group rather than a single entity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe sidechain refers to a separate blockchain which operates in parallel to the main blockchain and the sidechain is attached to the main chain by means of a two-way peg.
“The sidechain [121] refers to a separate blockchain which operates in parallel to the main blockchain and the sidechain is attached to the main chain by means of a two-way peg.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [121] Singh, 2020, Sidechain technologies in blockchain networks: an examination and state-of-the-art review, J. Netw. Comput. Appl. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAll blockchain users have fair rights over the network to link, verify and track transaction activities.
“Consequently, all blockchain users have fair rights over the network to link, verify and track transaction activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningHistorical data transactions in blockchain can assist in checking the authenticity of assets and avoiding fraudulent activities.
“Historical data transactions in blockchain can assist in checking the authenticity of assets and avoiding fraudulent activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThis enables data owners to control the exchange of their data on blockchain.
“This enables data owners to control the exchange of their data on blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn blockchains, the main element of security is the utilization of PKI (private/public key infrastructure).
“In blockchains, the main element of security is the utilization of PKI (private/public key infrastructure).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain has an ability to transform how confidential information is shared to prevent fraud and illegal activities in any sector where protecting sensitive data from different applications including financial services, government, and healthcare is important.
“Moreover, blockchain has an ability to transform how confidential information is shared to prevent fraud and illegal activities in any sector where protecting sensitive data from different applications including financial services, government, and healthcare is important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenBlockchain archives data transactions and events in an integrity-preserved, authenticity-guaranteed manner by means of immutable hash chains and digital signatures.
“Blockchain archives data transactions and events in an integrity-preserved, authenticity-guaranteed manner by means of immutable hash chains and digital signatures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningData on a blockchain is more accurate, robust and transparent than on the conventional network.
“Consequently, data on a blockchain is more accurate, robust and transparent than on the conventional network.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningTransaction data on the blockchain remains immutable over time.
“Immutability: Transaction data on the blockchain remains immutable over time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe processing of a transaction involves various steps, including defining heavy security, mining, validating, and storing it across multiple participants.
“The processing of a transaction involves various steps, including defining heavy security, mining, validating, and storing it across multiple participants [147].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [147] Jabbar, 2020, Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment, Int. J. Prod. Res. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenGiven complex IoT scenarios such as smart cities, eHealth, IoT data is enormous.
“Given complex IoT scenarios such as smart cities, eHealth, IoT data is enormous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain users do not need to review too much paperwork to complete a transaction, as each party has access to a single, and unchangeable ledger.
“Blockchain users do not need to review too much paperwork to complete a transaction, as each party has access to a single, and unchangeable ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationBlockchain does not require third parties or middleman and infrastructure's deployment cost for public blockchain to guarantee business operations, which can reduce the cost of operating business.
“Blockchain does not require third parties or middleman and infrastructure's deployment cost for public blockchain to guarantee business operations, which can reduce the cost of operating business [142].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [142] Bodkhe, 2020, Blockchain for industry 4.0: a comprehensive review, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenCost reduction is one of the main aims for many businesses.
“Cost reduction is one of the main aims for many businesses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe blockchain allows users to monitor transactions across the network so that computer and data rights are retained.
“Essentially, the blockchain allows users to monitor transactions across the network so that computer and data rights are retained.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBlock time increases rapidly, reducing the overall system performance.
“Consequently, block time increases rapidly, reducing the overall system performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne field of a new block's header always holds the hash value of metadata of the previous block, which makes the chain strongly immutable.
“One field of a new block's header always holds the hash value of metadata of the previous block, which makes the chain strongly immutable [143].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [143] Tanwar, 2020, Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications, J. Inform. Secur. Appl.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe cost of completing a transaction is the computational cost of a blockchain.
“Wood et al. [146] reported the cost of completing a transaction as the computational cost of a blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [146] Wood, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIoT network is often susceptible to security vulnerabilities including DDoS, Ransomware and malicious attacks.
“IoT network is often susceptible to security vulnerabilities including DDoS, Ransomware and malicious attacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningThere are a variety of mining techniques such as PoW, PoS, pBFT that require various levels of energy.
“There are a variety of mining techniques such as PoW, PoS, pBFT described above that require various levels of energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a Sybil attack, the malicious nodes create several identities to either flood the network with transactions or make false statements, such as fake traffic congestion.
“In a Sybil attack, the malicious nodes create several identities to either flood the network with transactions or make false statements, such as fake traffic congestion [7,10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7] Michelin, 2018, Speedychain: a framework for decoupling data from blockchain for smart cities
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Huang, 2019, Towards secure industrial IoT: blockchain system with credit-based consensus mechanism, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenDDoS attacks are difficult to conduct on a network of blockchains.
“DDoS attacks are difficult to conduct on a network of blockchains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenAlthough blockchain can withstand major security attacks such as Sybil, DDoS, selfish mining and Ransomware attacks, the existing blockchain has some inherent security flaws.
“Although blockchain can withstand major security attacks such as Sybil, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), selfish mining and Ransomware attacks, the existing blockchain has some inherent security flaws.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenPoW, which is the most decentralized mining process, solves a complicated mathematical puzzle that requires powerful computational hardware to perform transaction validation.
“For instance, PoW, which is the most decentralized mining process, solves a complicated mathematical puzzle that requires powerful computational hardware to perform transaction validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisecitationSelfish mining is a bitcoin mining strategy in which groups of miners collaborate to increase their earnings.
“Selfish mining is a bitcoin mining strategy in which groups of miners collaborate to increase their earnings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA miner (or group of miners) tends to increase their revenue through selfish mining by strategically withholding and releasing blocks into the network.
“A miner (or group of miners) tends to increase their revenue through selfish mining by strategically withholding and releasing blocks into the network [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] Kang, 2019, Toward secure blockchain-enabled internet of vehicles: optimizing consensus management using reputation and contract theory, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWithout robust monitoring of transactions, blockchain can be at risk of data loss and network disruption.
“Without robust monitoring of transactions, blockchain can be at risk of data loss and network disruption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIoT source code is stored by internet third parties and telecommunications companies, resulting in lack of trust among consumers.
“To ensure integrity has become the key research issue in IoT applications, as IoT source code is stored by internet third parties and telecommunications companies that result in lack of trust among consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis would trigger consumer's concerns about high running costs that would limit large scale implementation of blockchain-based systems.
“This would trigger consumer's concerns about high running costs that would limit large scale implementation of blockchain-based systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough blockchain and IoT can support safe data sharing, storing all genres of health data on a blockchain causes a delay in committing transactions and risks data leakage and disclosure of patient's sensitive information.
“Although blockchain and IoT can support safe data sharing, storing all genres of health data on a blockchain causes a delay in committing transactions and risks data leakage and disclosure of patient's sensitive information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs the number of devices joining in an IoT network increases, a bottleneck problem can occur in the existing centralised systems while authenticating, approving, and connecting new nodes within the network.
“Further, as the number of devices joining in an IoT network increases, a bottleneck problem can occur in the existing centralised systems while authenticating, approving, and connecting new nodes within the network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningEnsuring integrity has become the key research issue in IoT applications.
“To ensure integrity has become the key research issue in IoT applications, as IoT source code is stored by internet third parties and telecommunications companies that result in lack of trust among consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain has emerged as a breakthrough technology that can potentially address some IoT security, privacy, and scalability problems.
“With the solutions of these IoT problems, blockchain known as DTL has emerged a breakthrough technology to potentially address some of the IoT security, privacy, and scalability problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIf more than half of the machines running blockchain can control computing resources, they can alter consensus processes and stop the confirmation of new transactions for malicious purposes.
“If more than half of the machines running blockchain can control computing resources, they can alter consensus processes and stop the confirmation of new transactions for malicious purposes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlockchain can resolve privacy and security issues if an IoT application needs a decentralized P2P ecosystem.
“(1) Blockchain can resolve privacy and security issue if an IoT application needs a decentralized P2P ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Kamran, 2020, Blockchain and internet of things: a bibliometric study, Comput. Electr. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningEven for IoT devices with fairly large computational capabilities, the sophistication of the blockchain system will demand heavy technical and human resources.
“Even for IoT devices with fairly large computational capabilities, the sophistication of the blockchain system will demand heavy technical and human resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlockchain technology is susceptible to a message hijack, and DDoS attacks and these attacks are the most common on blockchain networks.
“Still, blockchain technology is susceptible to a message hijack, and DDoS attacks and these attacks are the most common on blockchain networks [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Alladi, 2019, Blockchain applications for industry 4.0 and industrial IoT: a review, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWith the BCIoT paradigm, no single organisation has control over the vast amount of data generated by IoT devices.
“With BCIoT paradigm, no single organisation has control over the vast amount of data generated by IoT devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn blockchain-based IoT, data leakage is rapidly detected and remedied.
“Therefore, data leakage is rapidly detected and remedied.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSecurity and privacy of the IoT ecosystem are significant concerns which have impeded its deployment on a broader scale.
“However, security and privacy of the IoT ecosystem are significant concerns which have impeded its deployment on a broader scale.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBlockchain could be a promising secured solution if an IoT application requires maintaining a payment process for its services without third-party control.
“(2) Blockchain could be a promising secured solution if IoT application requires to maintain payment process for its provided services without the control of third parties [149].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [149] Salah, 2019, Blockchain for AI: review and open research challenges, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenBlockchain technology enables participants to follow up on past transactions.
“Further, blockchain technology enables participants to follow up on past transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenDDoS attackers attempt to disrupt the network's mining process, e-wallets, crypto exchanges and other financial services.
“DDoS attackers attempt to disrupt the network's mining process, e-wallets, crypto exchanges and other financial services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain can secure data sharing across Cloud IoT enabled healthcare networks, with blockchain and Cloud managing user access and data sharing.
“Blockchain can secure data sharing across Cloud IoT enabled healthcare networks, in which blockchain and Cloud are the key contributors to manage user access and data sharing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain can be combined with distributed Cloud computing to make data storage and processing more scalable and efficient amongst IoT devices, homeowners, and external users.
“In particular, blockchain can be combined with distributed Cloud computing to make data storage and processing more scalable and efficient amongst IoT devices, homeowners, and external users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUse of blockchain models in the health sector will transform healthcare delivery into better patient service and system security.
“Consequently, the use of blockchain models in the health sector will transform healthcare delivery into better patient service and system security.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain's smart contracts can automate controlling and authentication of any entry in the blockchain, ensuring security and protection for insecure healthcare settings.
“In particular, blockchain's smart contracts can automate controlling and authentication of any entry in the blockchain, ensuring security and protection for insecure healthcare settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCloud computing has virtually unlimited storage and computational resources that can deliver on-demand, reliable, and secure IoT services.
“Meanwhile, Cloud computing has virtually unlimited storage and computational resources that can deliver on-demand, reliable, and secure IoT services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cloud computing has virtually unlimited storage and computational resources.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAttackers can discover the identities of users or devices by analysing transaction patterns.
“Attackers can discover the identities of users or devices by analysing transaction pattern.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenIf IoT applications demand to preserve logs and traceability of sequential transactions, blockchain can be one of the most effective solutions.
“(3) If IoT applications demand to preserve logs and traceability of sequential transactions, the blockchain can be one of the most effective solutions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [148] Kamran, 2020, Blockchain and internet of things: a bibliometric study, Comput. Electr. Eng. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWith its high-security features, blockchain shows high efficiency in managing smart city operations.
“With its high-security features, blockchain shows its high efficiency in managing smart city operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain can provide advanced security services for smart cities applications.
“In addition, blockchain can provide advanced security services for smart cities applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain has the potential to transform clinical services such as health monitoring, patient diagnosis or medical intervention assessment.
“Blockchain has the potential to transform clinical services, such as health monitoring, patient diagnosis or medical intervention assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe most common means of storing and processing data is a central database in many existing systems.
“The most common means of storing and processing data is a central database in many existing systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe convergence of blockchain and Cloud computing enables smart city architectures to tackle security and system performance issues.
“The convergence of blockchain and Cloud computing enables smart city architectures to tackle the issue of security and system performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenOne key challenge of integrating IoT with blockchain is handling the vast quantities of data produced by many IoT sensors on-chain.
“(1) One of the key challenges of integrating IoT with blockchain is how the vast quantities of data produced by many IoT sensors can be handled in on-chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAnother key issue is preserving network privacy and transaction confidentiality: anonymity of transaction history cannot be granted on public blockchain.
“(2) Another key issue is to preserve network privacy and transaction confidentiality: the anonymity of transaction history cannot be granted on public blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain platforms offer smart services such as home surveillance, home management, and device access control in smart home scenarios.
“Blockchain platforms offer smart services such as home surveillance, home management, and device access control in smart home scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain can provide specialized, highly reliable, and productive health care services.
“Blockchain can provide specialized, highly reliable, and productive health care services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe integration of Cloud computing with IoT and blockchain opens up a new paradigm named BCCoT, which will transfer applications' operation into a safe environment.
“The integration of Cloud computing with IoT and blockchain opens up a new paradigm named BCCoT, which will transfer applications' operation into a safe environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain suffers from potentially lower speeds or high latency when processing transactions.
“Furthermore, the blockchain suffers from potentially lower speeds or high latency when processing transactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisereasoningBoth Edge and Fog computing systems bring data processing closer to the data source, and data does not need to be sent to a remote Cloud or other centralised processing systems.
“Both the Edge and Fog computing systems bring facilitates of data processing closer to the data source, and data does not need to be sent to a remote Cloud or other centralised processing systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFog devices require mutual trust and protection along with the facilities of distributed computing because Fog devices are owned and managed by diverse entities.
“Fog devices require mutual trust and protection along with the facilities of distributed computing as Fog devices are owned and managed by diverse entities [116].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Kochovski, 2019, Trust management in a blockchain based fog computing platform with trustless smart oracles, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenUnlike conventional networks, routing decisions in SDN are made remotely on a controller instead of on each router.
“For instance, unlike conventional networks, routing decisions in SDN are made remotely on a controller instead of on each router.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe SDN architecture comprises three planes: Application, Control and Data plane.
“The SDN architecture depicted in Fig. 16 comprises three planes: 1) Application, 2) Control and 3) Data plane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEdge/Fog computing decreases the distance required for forwarding data and improves response time for services, especially for remote mission-critical applications.
“This decreases the distance required for forwarding data and improves response time for the services, especially for a remote mission-critical application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCloud of Things can transform the current IoT system into a system with minimal managerial effort, high efficiency and quality of service.
“Additionally, Cloud of Things can transform the current IoT system into a system with minimal managerial effort, high efficiency and quality of service.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSDN isolates network control functions from forwarding functions so that the network can be dynamic, structured, and programmatically configured to improve its performance and monitoring.
“SDN [157] isolates network control functions from the forwarding functions so that the network can be dynamic, structured, and programmatically configured to improve its performance and monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [157] Schaller, 2017, Software defined networking architecture standardization, Comput. Stand. Interfac. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFog computing is a distributed platform that raises challenges of guaranteeing privacy and security for Fog devices and their affiliated IoT devices.
“Fog computing is a distributed platform that raises the challenges of guaranteeing privacy and security for the Fog devices and their affiliated IoT devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCloud analytical tools can support a variety of IoT operations, including historical data processing, information storage and statistical analysis.
“Cloud analytical tools can support a variety of IoT operations, including historical data processing, information storage and statistical analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFog computing has emerged on the Internet of Everything to reduce energy consumption for IoT devices and significantly increase the processing time of the client's services.
“Fog computing has emerged on the Internet of Everything (IoE) to reduce energy consumption for IoT devices and significantly increase the processing time of the client's services [154].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [154] Singh, 2020, Blockchain and fog based architecture for internet of everything in smart cities, Future Internet source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlockchains eliminate the need for an independent third party and can be undertaken in highly decentralized environments, where all parties including IoT devices, Edge/Fog and Cloud servers need a high degree of autonomy during operation.
“Basically, blockchains eliminate the need for an independent third party and can be undertaken in highly decentralized environments, where all parties including IoT devices, Edge/Fog and Cloud servers need a high degree of autonomy during operation [116].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Kochovski, 2019, Trust management in a blockchain based fog computing platform with trustless smart oracles, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningSDN differs from traditional networks in several ways.
“SDN differ from traditional networks in several ways.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningSeveral other protocols such as PoS and pBFT consensus are suggested for the Fog network.
“However, several other protocols such as PoS, pBFT consensus are suggested for the Fog network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationA decentralized SDN controller raises issues including maintaining state consistency among multiple SDN controllers, static flow control between the SDN controller and forwarding plane, causing non-uniform distribution of loads between replicated SDN controllers.
“However, a decentralized SDN controller raises some issues including the problem of maintaining state consistency among multiple SDN controllers, static flow control between the SDN controller and forwarding plane, which causes a non-uniform distribution of loads between the replicated SDN controllers [159].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [159] Sharma, 2017, Distblocknet: a distributed blockchains-based secure SDN architecture for IoT networks, IEEE Commun. Mag. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMalpractice within healthcare such as compelling patients to perform tests and purchase medicines from physician's preferred clinics or hospitals arises in many countries from a lack of adequate national policies and regulations.
“Malpractice within healthcare such as compelling patients to perform tests and purchases medicines from physician's preferred clinics or hospitals arises in many countries from a lack of adequate national policies and regulations [167].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [167] Rathee, 2019, A hybrid framework for multimedia data processing in IoT-healthcare using blockchain technology, Multimed. Tool. Appl. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA patient having access to his past history could avoid duplication of medical records and unnecessary medical tests.
“However, a patient having access to his past history could avoid the duplication of medical records, and unnecessary medical tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain provides patients with the ability to boost the authorization and integrity of patient data.
“Blockchain provides patients with the ability to boost the authorization and integrity of patient data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis process can provide users with better security than the approach of storing all data blocks in a centralized server and the hash value/pointer of the data block on the chain.
“This process can provide users with better security than that of the approach to store all data blocks in a centralized server and hash value/pointer of data block on the chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe lightweight multi-chain enabled decentralized SDN-IoT architecture was suggested to address the issues of the current SDN based IoT architecture.
“The lightweight multi-chain enabled decentralized SDN-IoT architecture depicted in Fig. 17 was suggested to address the issues of the current SDN based IoT architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenOnly a few countries, including Estonia and Peru, have already adopted blockchain health management in practice.
“However, only a few countries, including Estonia, Peru, have already adopted blockchain health management in practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Only a few countries, including Estonia and Peru, have already adopted blockchain health management in practice.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain leveraged healthcare can reform and promote interoperability, authorized access to patient medical records, secure tracking of prescriptions, hospitals assets, and wearable sensors during their entire life cycle.
“Blockchain leveraged healthcare can reform and promote interoperability, authorized access to patient medical records, secure tracking of prescriptions, hospitals assets, and wearable sensors during their entire life cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn most current eHealth settings, patients do not have access to EMRs of the healthcare providers.
“In most current eHealth settings, patients do not have access to EMRs of the healthcare providers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe adoption of the blockchain paradigm in eHealth can effectively address critical issues of security and privacy, and increase service efficacy to promote patient care and gradual transformation of existing health systems into decentralized eHealth.
“The adoption of the blockchain paradigm in eHealth can effectively address critical issues of security and privacy, and increase service efficacy to promote patient care and gradual transformation of existing health systems into decentralized eHealth [161][162][163][164].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [161][162][163][164]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain can dramatically impact efficiency in healthcare delivery and costs by providing the patient with full control over his or her past medical records.
“The blockchain can dramatically impact the efficiency in healthcare delivery and costs by providing the patient with full control over his or her past medical records including reports, financial documents, laboratory test results, imaging studies of x-rays, CAT scans, and vital sign measurements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationPreserving privacy in eHealth systems can make contact efficient between physician and patient, which is crucial for quality treatment, improved autonomy and tackling economic damage, embarrassment and discrimination.
“Preserving privacy in eHealth system can make contact efficient between physician and patient, which is crucial for quality treatment, improved autonomy and tackling economic damage, embarrassment and discrimination [171].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [171] Nass, 2009, The value and importance of health information privacy
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationHealth systems need to implement fine-grained access control.
“Naturally, health systems need to implement fine-grained access control [177].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [177] Lu, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain can preserve the integrity of data while ensuring it remains tamper-proof.
“Blockchain can preserve the integrity of data while ensuring it remains tamper-proof.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe storage cost in the on-chain method is low because the size of the hash value is relatively small.
“The storage cost in the on-chain method is low because the size of the hash value is relatively small [184].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [184] Xu, 2017, A taxonomy of blockchain-based systems for architecture design
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe blockchain platform can facilitate the exchange of healthcare professional's expertise for more precise medical care, personal diagnosis, and treatment.
“The blockchain platform can facilitate the exchange of healthcare professional's expertise for more precise medical care, personal diagnosis, and treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain can be an automated technological solution to make the current storage method for health data more secure and effective.
“Blockchain can be an automated technological solution to make the current storage method for health data more secure and effective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe openness of blockchain is a major threat to the privacy of patients in the eHealth system.
“This openness of blockchain is a major threat to the privacy of patients in the eHealth system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain-based health data management is a transparent and open framework to support better healthcare services.
“Blockchain-based health data management is a transparent and open framework to support better healthcare services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOn-chain storage is considered neither financially nor technologically feasible.
“On-chain storage is considered neither financially nor technologically feasible.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn general, health data are sensitive and need protection against unauthorized access.
“In general, health data are sensitive and need protection against unauthorized access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe combination of Cloud, IoT, and blockchain can offer great advancements in smart medical services.
“Indeed, the combination of Cloud, IoT, and blockchain can offer great advancements in smart medical services [187].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [187] Du, 2018, A medical information service platform based on distributed cloud and blockchain
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningOutsourcing tasks to a Cloud computing provider bring a few other challenges.
“However, outsourcing tasks to a Cloud computing provider bring a few other challenges.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe decentralized ledger in the blockchain technology increases the reliability of recorded documents and the efficiency of the proposed crowdsourcing system.
“The decentralized ledger in the blockchain technology increases the reliability of recorded documents and the efficiency of the proposed crowdsourcing system [94].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [94] Park, 2018, Corus: blockchain-based trustworthy evaluation system for efficacy of healthcare remedies
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe client needs to make contracts with the service provider so that the data privacy cannot be breached.
“Also, the client needs to make contracts with the service provider so that the data privacy cannot be breached [192].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192] Zhang, 2018, Cloud storage for electronic health records based on secret sharing with verifiable reconstruction outsourcing, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBlockchain, a revolutionary decentralized model, can be adapted not only to remove the limitations of the conventional crowdsourcing schemes but also to usher technological advancements including decentralization and transparency.
“Blockchain, a revolutionary decentralized model, can be adapted not only to remove the limitations of the conventional crowdsourcing schemes but also to usher technological advancements including decentralization and transparency [193,195].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [193] Zhu, 2019, zkCrowd: a hybrid blockchain-based crowdsourcing platform, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [195] Li, 2018, Crowdbc: a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distr. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFog computing has many benefits and is suited for applications that require fast response time, low latency, and real-time processing, especially healthcare.
“Fog computing has many benefits and is suited for applications that require fast response time, low latency, and real-time processing, for specially healthcare [47,208].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Uddin, 2020, Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework, Internet of Things source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [208] Islam, 2019, A blockchain-based fog computing framework for activity recognition as an application to e-healthcare services, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe convergence of IoT, Fog and Cloud computing has accelerated the advent of many sophisticated applications including eHealth, agriculture, supply chain, an automatic vehicle with the benefits of enhanced QoS.
“The convergence of IoT, Fog and Cloud computing has accelerated the advent of many sophisticated applications including eHealth, agriculture, supply chain, an automatic vehicle with the benefits of enhanced QoS.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe Cloud service provider might be curious about a user's sensitive data and breach the client's privacy.
“The Cloud service provider might be curious about a user's sensitive data and breach the client's privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost current searchable public-key encryption (SPE) schemes are vulnerable to the adaptive leakage-exploiting attacks or unable to meet the efficiency requirements of realistic applications.
“However, most current such schemes, particularly the searchable public-key encryption (SPE) schemes are vulnerable to the adaptive leakage-exploiting attacks or unable to meet the efficiency requirements of realistic applications [96].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Chen, 2019, Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHealth data is typically encrypted before uploading to the Cloud storage.
“Health data is typically encrypted before uploading to the Cloud storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMost importantly, IoT devices are typically inadequate in performance.
“Most importantly, IoT devices are typically inadequate in performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSmart contract stored in the public ledger is automatically running on the blockchain without the need of the third party when the contract associated event is triggered.
“Smart contract stored in the public ledger is automatically running on the blockchain without the need of the third party when the contract associated event is triggered [196].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] Macrinici, 2018, Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study, Telematics Inf. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCrowdsourcing on the traditional platform is exposed to several shortcomings such as a single point of failure, controller's silent misbehaviour, a conflict of opinions between the task requesters and the workers.
“Crowdsourcing on the traditional platform is exposed to several shortcomings such as a single point of failure, controller's silent misbehaviour, a conflict of opinions between the task requesters and the workers [193].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [193] Zhu, 2019, zkCrowd: a hybrid blockchain-based crowdsourcing platform, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWith the advent of Fog, Cloud and IoT technology, a new business paradigm has evolved that enables customers to use cities/home's resources optimally to provide them with a wide range of services.
“With the advent of Fog, Cloud and IoT technology, a new business paradigm has evolved that enables customers to use cities/home's resources optimally to provide them with a wide range of services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIn chain structured blockchain, a block is propagated throughout the network after a miner completes PoW for the block, which brings problems with scalability and high network overhead.
“In chain structured blockchain, a block is propagated throughout the network after a miner completes PoW for the block.This brings its problem with scalability and high network overhead.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThis model can also increase resource utilization, and reduce operating costs.
“This model can also increase resource utilization, and reduce operating”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWith the rapid development of Cloud computing, the original storage way of health data has been changed.
“With the rapid development of Cloud computing, the original storage way of health data has been changed [96].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [96] Chen, 2019, Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationWith the emergence of blockchain, smart contracts have become one of the most sought-after technologies because of their automated nature.
“With the emergence of blockchain, smart contracts have become one of the most sought-after technologies because of their automated nature [196].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [196] Macrinici, 2018, Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study, Telematics Inf. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAlthough the existing systems can provide smart home devices with fast connectivity and safe communication, those are centralised and have problems with scalability.
“Although the existing systems can provide smart home devices with fast connectivity and safe communication, those are centralised and have problems with scalability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThanks to the distinctive nature of IoT devices, the design of smart cities infrastructure remains challenges, including ensuring anonymity, completeness, and bottleneck issues.
“Thanks to the distinctive nature of IoT devices, the design of smart cities infrastructure remains challenges, including ensuring anonymity, completeness, and bottleneck issues [216].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [216] Sookhak, 2018, Security and privacy of smart cities: a survey, research issues and challenges, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCloud third parties store, process and manage the home data, which is often vulnerable to one single point of failure.
“Cloud third parties store, process and manage the home data, which is often vulnerable to one single point of failure [214,215].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [214] Alessio, 2014, On the integration of cloud computing and internet of things
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [215] Stojkoska, 2017, A review of internet of things for smart home: challenges and solutions, J. Clean. Prod. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHowever, the blockchain with attractive technological features, Cloud, and Fog computing can be a promising paradigm to opt smart cities/home services.
“However, the blockchain with attractive technological features, Cloud, and Fog computing can be a promising paradigm to opt smart cities/home services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCloud computing powered by a blockchain with distributed, secured and private properties can provide a promising solution to these concerns.
“Cloud computing powered by a blockchain with distributed, secured and private properties [218] can provide a promising solution to these concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [218] AbuNaser, 2019, Advanced survey of blockchain for the internet of things smart home
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMany of the current smart homes depend on third parties to provide different services to the resident, and in these systems, the resident has little control over his data.
“Many of the current smart homes depend on third parties to provide different services to the resident, and in these systems, the resident has little control over his data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenWhile smart homes can provide residents with several advantages, there remain several challenges including malicious attacks and privacy issues to be resolved.
“While smart homes can provide residents with several advantages, there remain several challenges including malicious attacks and privacy issues to be resolved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningDecentralized systems such as blockchain and smart contracts have been regarded as a potential means of addressing these problems.
“Decentralized systems such as blockchain and smart contracts have been regarded as a potential means of addressing these problems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDespite having such a vision of smart cities, ensuring high quality and security for smart city services has appeared to be difficult.
“Despite having such a vision of smart cities, ensuring high quality and security for smart city services has appeared to be difficult.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenBlockchain is unstable on IoT devices due to its resource constraints.
“Blockchain is unstable on IoT devices due to its resource constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to GDPR, a service provider must incorporate facilities of the user's consent and the withdrawal of that consents in their system.
“According to the regulations, a service provider must incorporate facilities of the user's consent and the withdrawal of that consents in their system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Marelli, 2020, Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health, Pol. Stud. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to GDPR, the service provider must also provide the customer with all the data in a format that is readable on the computer.
“Further, the service provider must also provide the customer with all the data in a format that is readable on the computer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Marelli, 2020, Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health, Pol. Stud. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationGDPR health regulations outlined privacy laws across Europe to protect user's control and confidentiality on his or her health data.
“GDPR health regulations [181] outlined privacy laws across Europe to protect user's control and confidentiality on his or her health data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Marelli, 2020, Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health, Pol. Stud. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAccording to GDPR, the service provider must generate a report at the request of the user on how the user's data is being processed and used.
“The service provider must generate a report at the request of the user on how the user's data is being processed and used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [181] Marelli, 2020, Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health, Pol. Stud. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenState-of-the-art works in the blockchain proposed a variation of PoW to overcome the limitations of the generic blockchain.
“State-of-the-art works in the blockchain proposed a variation of PoW to overcome the limitations of the generic blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMalicious users or drivers can falsely report their locations in such a system.
“Malicious users or drivers can falsely report their locations in such a system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe traffic jam prediction model assists users' vehicles to avoid congestion on the road.
“The traffic jam prediction model assists users' vehicles to avoid congestion on the road.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
PremisereasoningFurther, a large number of IoT transactions propagate in the blockchain networks and cause higher energy consumption.
“Further, a large number of IoT transactions propagate in the blockchain networks and cause higher energy consumption.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIoT devices need to associate them with a secure software agent when switching from one area to another.
“IoT devices need to associate them with a secure software agent when switching from one area to another [182,240].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [182] Zheng, 2018, Blockchain-based personal health data sharing system using cloud storage
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [240] de Meo, 2014, Recommending users in social networks by integrating local and global reputation
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThe present credit-based system is not adequate to facilitate transactions for such autonomous intelligent transport system.
“the present credit-based system is not adequate to facilitate transactions for such autonomous intelligent transport system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe integration of Cloud with virtually unlimited storage, Fog computing with processing capabilities and blockchain with high-security feature revamps smart transport security and service quality.
“The integration of Cloud with virtually unlimited storage, Fog computing with processing capabilities and blockchain with high-security feature revamps smart transport security and service quality.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese technologies can either combinedly or individually meet the major IoT network requirements with high performance.
“These technologies can either combinedly or individually meet the major IoT network requirements with high performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
PremisereasoningHowever, not all users might be motivated to share their sensitive information about routes and locations with crowdsourcing without sufficient incentives.
“However, not all users might be motivated to share their sensitive information about routes and locations with crowdsourcing without sufficient incentives.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenSuch prediction model requires live traffic data, users' location and participants' private details including their name, and phone number that are sensitive.
“Such prediction model requires live traffic data, users' location and participants' private details including their name, and phone number that are sensitive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGoogle maps use crowdsourcing for data pertaining to live traffic congestion.
“Google maps use crowdsourcing for data pertaining to live traffic congestion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWith Multi-Agent System (MAS), a software agent working on half of IoT devices is an efficient way to promote social interactions among intelligent devices.
“With Multi-Agent System (MAS), a software agent working on half of IoT devices is an efficient way to promote social interactions among intelligent devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningBlockchain with Cloud, Fog and IoT can build a stable, reliable, and decentralized intelligent transport ecosystem.
“Blockchain with Cloud, Fog and IoT can build a stable, reliable, and decentralized intelligent transport ecosystem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe block, in addition to transactions in the block is verified and confirmed by the blockchain nodes.
“The block, in addition to transactions in the block is verified and confirmed by the blockchain nodes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenIoT devices produce vast numbers of transactions at a higher rate, but the current blockchain cannot process those transactions at the same rate.
“IoT devices produce vast numbers of transactions at a higher rate, but the current blockchain cannot process those transactions at the same rate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenFurther, IoT devices are often unknown, and unreferenced and the traditional approach of asking other trusted agents for information is usually impracticable.
“Further, IoT devices are often unknown, and unreferenced and the traditional approach of asking other trusted agents for information is usually impracticable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningFurther, to apply PoS in a new distributed application is challenging because nodes in the network do not own any stake or cryptocurrency to burn in the initial stage.
“Further, to apply PoS in a new distributed application is challenging because nodes in the network do not own any stake or cryptocurrency to burn in the initial stage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPoS, PoB (Proof of Burn), and PoET follow the similar principle of PoW.
“PoS, PoB (Proof of Burn), and PoET follow the similar principle of PoW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHowever, IoT devices generally have no accurate information available regarding the agents of a new environment.
“However, IoT devices generally have no accurate information available regarding the agents of a new environment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenCurrent IoT networking is confronted with many challenges including security, huge traffic, high availability, high reliability, high bandwidth, and limited energy.
“Current IoT networking is confronted with many challenges including security, huge traffic, high availability, high reliability, high bandwidth, and limited energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe incorporation of Cloud, Fog computing, and blockchain can achieve efficient and secure connectivity in automated vehicular networks.
“The incorporation of Cloud, Fog computing, and blockchain can achieve efficient and secure connectivity in automated vehicular networks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe miners select a certain number of unconfirmed transactions from the Pool in a random fashion or based on a fee in order to make a block.
“The miners select a certain number of unconfirmed transactions from the Pool in a random fashion or based on a fee in order to make a block.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenIn blockchain technology, all transactions generated in the P2P network is stored in a Transactions Pool.
“In blockchain technology, all transactions generated in the P2P network is stored in a Transactions Pool.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost existing IoT architectures maintain a centralized data centre for storing and processing sensor data, which is at risk of security breaches, single-point failure, and malicious attacks such as DDoS and Sybil attacks.
“Most existing IoT architecture maintains a centralized data centre for storing and processing sensors' data, which can be at risk of breaching security, single-point failure and malicious attacks like DDoS, Sybil attack [8,10,273].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [8] Yu, 2018, Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things, IEEE Wireless Communications source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10] Huang, 2019, Towards secure industrial IoT: blockchain system with credit-based consensus mechanism, IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [273] Yu, 2010, Sybillimit: a near-optimal social network defense against sybil attacks, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenSDN flexibility carries many security threats including unavailability of routing information to forwarding devices when forwarding devices fail to communicate with SDN controller due to the programmable interface being used illegally, and hidden vulnerabilities of a new complex system.
“SDN flexibility carries many security threats including unavailability of routing information to forwarding devices when forwarding devices fail to communicate with SDN controller due to the programmable interface being used illegally, and hidden vulnerabilities of a new complex system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDistributed storage of blockchain P2P enables the restoration of flow tables of a node during a network failure.
“Distributed storage of blockchain P2P enables the restoration of flow tables of a node during a network failure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe remote Fog Agents can lie about their static and dynamic execution parameters.
“The remote Fog Agents can lie about their static and dynamic execution parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenThe users require to pay a certain amount to miner nodes for adding every microtransaction in the blockchain which can demotivate them to participate in data offloading.
“The users require to pay a certain amount to miner nodes for adding every microtransaction in the blockchain which can demotivate them to participate in data offloading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMobile devices can discharge data traffic to a Fog layer to extend their network transmission bandwidths.
“Mobile devices can discharge data traffic to a Fog layer to extend their network transmission bandwidths.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTo cope with this issue, mobile data offloading to Fog or Cloud servers is a promising solution.
“To cope with this issue, mobile data offloading to Fog or Cloud servers is a promising solution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFurther, there involves a lot of microtransactions between the service providers and users in mobile data offloading.
“Further, there involves a lot of microtransactions between the service providers and users in mobile data offloading.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenVarious network attacks are involved in SDN controllers, OpenFlow switches, and host interfaces.
“Various network attacks are involved in SDN controllers, OpenFlow switches, and host interfaces.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFirst, the robustness of the blockchain network is enhanced, by adding more miners.
“First, the robustness of the blockchain network is enhanced, by adding more miners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenMobile devices can access the Edge servers to expand their computing capabilities.
“Mobile devices can access the Edge servers to expand their computing capabilities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenMobile and IoT devices are usually restricted to local computing resources.
“Mobile and IoT devices are usually restricted to local computing resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenEdge computing has been seen as a promising solution for mobile blockchain applications, which can bring several benefits.
“Edge computing has been seen as a promising solution for mobile blockchain applications, which can bring several benefits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenTo realize economical benefits on a mobile system, Edge providers need to set optimized pricing levels for the Edge computing services.
“To realize economical benefits on a mobile system, Edge providers need to set optimized pricing levels for the Edge computing services.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs user's reliance on the Internet rises, traditional network designs with static characteristics will eventually fail to meet all requirements.
“As user's reliance on the Internet rises, traditional network designs with static characteristics will eventually fail to meet all requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenHowever, network operators require heavy investment to constantly expand the capabilities of network infrastructure with the rapid rise of mobile devices.
“However, network operators require heavy investment to constantly expand the capabilities of network infrastructure with the rapid rise of mobile devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCentralized data centres in IoT result in unavailability of service and a deluge of sensor data, outweighing the important advantages of the IoT system.
“This results in unavailability of service and the deluge of sensor data and thus outweighs the important advantages of the IoT system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenWith the exponential growth of mobile phones, the management of huge mobile data traffic requires a secure and fast network connection to boost QoS for consumers.
“With the exponential growth of mobile phones, the management of huge mobile data traffic requires a secure and fast network connection to boost QoS for consumers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe mobile devices can also discharge computing tasks to the Fog layer to release their workloads.
“The mobile devices can also discharge computing tasks to the Fog layer to release their workloads.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
PremisereasoningThese devices require to offload computational tasks to the Cloud/Fog to perform PoW.
“These devices require to offload computational tasks to the Cloud/Fog to perform PoW.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenHowever, the blockchain with its conventional consensus mechanism lacks scalability and limit the performances of mobile data offloading process.
“However, the blockchain with its conventional consensus mechanism lacks scalability and limit the performances of mobile data offloading process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe conventional algorithms for unloading mobile data do not have any mechanism to inspire or enable mobile devices or users to engage actively in the offloading process.
“The conventional algorithms for unloading mobile data do not have any mechanism to inspire or enable mobile devices or users to engage actively in the offloading process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenSecond, smartphone users can achieve a reward for executing a consensus mechanism of the blockchain by utilizing Edge resources.
“Second, smartphone users can achieve a reward for executing a consensus mechanism of the blockchain by utilizing Edge resources.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenGeneric blockchain was suggested to form a P2P network for facilitating mobile data offloading securely.
“Generic blockchain was suggested to form a P2P network for facilitating mobile data offloading securely.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenFor instance, an infected controller can deliver misleading and deceptive instructions to OpenFlow switches by inserting and changing flow rules.
“For instance, an infected controller can deliver misleading and deceptive instructions to OpenFlow switches by inserting and changing flow rules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenSuch a software agent needs a platform that can facilitate virtualization, encryption, data storage, and high computational power for running accurate blockchain algorithms.
“Further, such software agent needs a platform that can facilitate virtualization, encryption, data storage and high computational power for running accurate blockchain algorithms”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenWith MAS, a software agent working on half of IoT devices is an efficient way to promote social interactions between intelligent devices.
“With MAS, a software agent working on half of IoT devices is an efficient way to promote social interactions between intelligent devices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisereasoningIntegrating blockchain and IoT has recently gained significant popularity among researchers to address the issues of centralized IoT architectures.
“The notion of integrating blockchain and IoT has recently gained significant popularity among the researchers to exploit such hybrid architectures to address the aforementioned issues.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationOzyilmaz et al.'s research addressed the connectivity issue of IoT devices with blockchain, but high power and bandwidth consumption required for the blockchain remain unsolved.
“This research addressed the connectivity issue of IoT devices with blockchain but high power and bandwidth consumption required for the blockchain remain unsolved in the proposal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIoT devices are manufactured with limited computational power and memory capacities, while blockchain technology requires an excessive level of storage and power.
“IoT devices are manufactured with limited computational power and memory capacities, while blockchain technology requires an excessive level of storage and power [285].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [285] Atlam, 2018, Blockchain with internet of things: benefits, challenges, and future directions, Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl.
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAdoption of blockchain technology into IoT applications poses challenges such as different mining rate and imbalanced resource capacity between IoT devices and blockchain nodes.
“However, the adoption of the blockchain technology into IoT applications poses a couple of challenges outlined in Fig. 21 such as different mining rate, and imbalanced resources capacity between IoT devices and the blockchain nodes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAutonomous agents have been suggested to adopt blockchain technology in various IoT ecosystems including healthcare, smart cities, smart home, and electric energy trading, regulated and managed by autonomous agents on behalf of users.
“Researchers [15,213,[274][275][276] suggested autonomous agents adopt blockchain technology in various IoT ecosystems including healthcare, smart cities, smart home and electric energy trading which are regulated and managed by the autonomous agents on behalf of users.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [15,213,[274][275][276]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQayumi et al. proposed multi-agent to solve the scalability issue of the blockchain-based architecture but did not describe how this can be achieved.
“Qayumi et al. [275] proposed multi-agent to solve the scalability issue of the blockchain-based architecture but did not describe how this can be achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [275] Qayumi, 2015, Multi-agent based intelligence generation from very large datasets
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe convergence of blockchain technologies and multi-agents can handle sensitive data to advocate transparency and trustworthy interactions for consumers and service providers.
“The convergence of blockchain technologies and multi-agents such as an agent for environmental protection, energy trading and monitoring patients can handle sensitive data to advocate transparency and trustworthy interactions for consumers and service providers [213].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [213] Calvaresi, 2018, Multi-agent systems and blockchain: results from a systematic literature review
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAn Edge-based personalized Agent can be appointed for each sharding where the agent collects transactions from IoT devices and makes blocks to further reduce high bandwidth requirements of the blockchain.
“An Edge-based personalized Agent can be appointed for each sharding where the agent collects transactions from IoT devices and make blocks to further reduce high bandwidth requirements of the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIoT devices need to associate with a secure software agent when switching from one area to another.
“IoT devices need to associate them with a secure software agent when switching from one area to another [182,240].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [182] Zheng, 2018, Blockchain-based personal health data sharing system using cloud storage
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [240] de Meo, 2014, Recommending users in social networks by integrating local and global reputation
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThese works are still at a preliminary stage and will be developed in future.
“However, these works are still at a preliminary stage and will be developed in future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationTo address the connectivity issue of IoT with blockchain, MEC can host a sidechain close to the IoT network and enable IoT devices to communicate with the mainchain via the sidechain.
“To address the connectivity issue of IoT with blockchain, the MEC (Multi-access Edge Computing) can host sidechain which is close to the IoT network and enables the IoT devices to communicate with mainchain via the sidechain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSharding avoids the propagation of a transaction across the entire network and hence can save bandwidth.
“This results in avoiding the propagation of a transaction across the entire network and hence can save bandwidth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMachine learning and artificially intelligent technology typically form a basis for the creation of an autonomous agent to process and automatically identify action on data streaming from sensors or online sources.
“Machine learning and artificially intelligent technology typically form a basis for the creation of an autonomous agent to process and automatically identify action on the data streaming from sensors or online sources [213].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [213] Calvaresi, 2018, Multi-agent systems and blockchain: results from a systematic literature review
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEdge devices augmented with IoT devices might have sufficient bandwidth.
“Recently, Edge-devices augmented with IoT devices might have sufficient bandwidth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA performance analysis of the Markov decision process for selecting Edge-Cloud providers was partially completed.
“However, a performance analysis of the Markov decision process for selecting Edge-Cloud providers was partially completed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Kochovski, 2019, Trust management in a blockchain based fog computing platform with trustless smart oracles, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Patient Centric Agent in Ref. [239] operates on the patient's hardware at the end of the patient and creates collaboration between the blockchain and the sensor networks in the patient's body.
“The Patient Centric Agent in Ref. [239] operates on the patient's hardware at the end of the patient and creates collaboration between the blockchain and the sensor networks in the patient's body [287].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [239] Uddin, 2018, Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: a block architecture, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [287] Uddin, 2019, A decentralized patient agent controlled blockchain for remote patient monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe blockchain has been used for maintaining the trust of Edge-Cloud but other security requirements such as data integrity, confidentiality and availability have not been addressed.
“The blockchain has been used for maintaining the trust of Edge-Cloud but other security requirements such as data integrity, confidentiality and availability have not been addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] Kochovski, 2019, Trust management in a blockchain based fog computing platform with trustless smart oracles, Future Generat. Comput. Syst. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTrust module is yet to be included in the system to make it sustainable.
“Trust module is yet to be included in the system to make it sustainable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] Pan, 2018, Edgechain: an edge-IoT framework and prototype based on blockchain and smart contracts, IEEE Internet of Things J. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe system in Ref. [239] has a centralised blockchain controller at the end of the patient and decentralized blockchain storage at the other end.
“However, the system has a centralised blockchain controller at the end of the patient and decentralized blockchain storage at the other end.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [239] Uddin, 2018, Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: a block architecture, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPerformance analysis has not been conducted for the proposal.
“Performance analysis has not been conducted for the proposal.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [272] Seitz, 2018, Fog computing as enabler for blockchain-based IIoT app marketplaces-a case study
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Patient Centric Agent [239] does not directly transmit transactions to the blockchain network; instead, it creates blocks by organizing a certain number of transactions.
“the Patient Centric Agent [239] does not directly transmit transactions to the blockchain network; instead, it creates blocks by organizing a certain number of transactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [239] Uddin, 2018, Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: a block architecture, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe performance of the system was not analyzed with respect to power consumption, throughput and other parameters.
“The performance of the system was not analyzed with respect to power consumption, throughput and other parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [111] Debe, 2019, Lot public fog nodes reputation system: a decentralized solution using ethereum blockchain, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe Patient Centric Agent can optimize the consensus mechanism to reduce the bandwidth in the blockchain network.
“Further, the Patient Centric Agent can optimize the consensus mechanism to reduce the bandwidth in the blockchain network.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe performance of the system has not been analyzed with respect to power consumption and throughput.
“The performance of the system has not been analyzed with respect to power consumption and throughput.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [99] Debe, 2020, Monetization of services provided by public fog nodes using blockchain and smart contracts, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Ref. [17]'s settings, the IoT devices are connected to blockchain via the smart Agent [17] which implements a couple of security protocol to safeguard IoT devices from cyberattacks.
“In Ref. [17]'s settings, the IoT devices are connected to blockchain via the smart Agent [17] which implements a couple of security protocol to safeguard IoT devices from cyberattacks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Uddin, 2019, An efficient selective miner consensus protocol in blockchain oriented IoT smart monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenThe health data continuously streamed from wearable devices escalate the challenges of health data storage.
“The health data continuously streamed from wearable devices escalate the challenges.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo process patient's records rapidly, a lightweight modified PoS consensus protocol for the blockchain was constructed using the Fuzzy Inference Method.
“To process patient's records rapidly, a lightweight modified PoS consensus protocol for the blockchain was constructed using the Fuzzy Inference Method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Uddin, 2020, Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework, Internet of Things source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Patient Centric Agent in Refs.[47,280] replicated at the three levels enables outsourcing patient's tasks to Edge and Cloud nodes while preserving privacy and security.
“The Patient Centric Agent in Refs.[47,280] replicated at the three levels enables outsourcing patient's tasks to Edge and Cloud nodes while preserving privacy and security.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [47] Uddin, 2020, Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework, Internet of Things source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [280] Uddin, 2019, Blockchain leveraged task migration in body area sensor networks
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn the architecture depicted in Fig. 24, along with the smart agent and the blockchain component, the article [17] included an extra network manager module to encrypt user data using sign encryption that preserves user privacy.
“In this architecture depicted in Fig. 24, along with the smart agent and the blockchain component, the article [17] included an extra network manager module to encrypt user data using sign encryption that preserves user privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Uddin, 2019, An efficient selective miner consensus protocol in blockchain oriented IoT smart monitoring
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe data blocks whose processing demands blockchain-based secure storage are directed to the distributed ledger.
“The data blocks which processing demands the blockchain-based secure storage are directed to the distributed ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDecentralizing the Patient Agent in an eHealth architecture results in software sustainability and allows the rapid and secure storage of medical data without trusted authorities from third parties.
“Decentralizing Patient Agent in eHealth architecture results in software sustainability and allows the rapid and secure storage of medical data without the trusted authorities from third parties.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOther repositories such as EHR, EMR, and Cloud eHealth can be recommended as per the requirements of various data blocks.
“Other repositories such as EHR, EMR, Cloud eHealth can be recommended as per the requirements of various data blocks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe authors [281] contributed to enabling the Patient Centric Agent for building a machine learning-based recommendation model for health data storage that can accommodate data storage requirements and patient preferences and make storage decisions rapidly, in real-time, even with streamed data.
“Here, the authors [281] contributed to enabling the Patient Centric Agent for building machine learning-based recommendation model for health data storage that can accommodate data storage requirements, and patient preferences and make storage decisions rapidly, in real-time, even with streamed data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe consensus mechanism for data processing in remote patient management was incorporated at the Fog and Cloud levels.
“The consensus mechanism for data processing in remote patient management was incorporated at the Fog and Cloud levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Uddin, 2020, Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework, Internet of Things source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTo address these challenges, the Patient Agent in Ref. [281] has been provided with the knowledge of determining rapid repositories for every data blocks based on their characteristics and privacy requirements.
“To address these challenges, the Patient Agent in Ref. [281] has been provided with the knowledge of determining rapid repositories for every data blocks based on their characteristics and privacy requirements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBilling documents, healthcare provider's notes, and medication summaries can be processed and stored in the blockchain ledger.
“For example, billing documents, healthcare provider's notes, medication summaries can be processed and stored in the blockchain ledger.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationFederated learning is a technique of machine learning that trains an algorithm across several decentralized nodes or servers that do not exchange their local data samples with any centralized server.
“Federated learning [295] is a technique of machine learning that trains an algorithm across several decentralized nodes or servers that do not exchange their local data samples with any centralized server.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [295] Xie, 2018, A survey of machine learning techniques applied to software defined networking (sdn): research issues and challenges, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn nature, the essence of the COVID-19 pandemic itself is distributed.
“In nature, the essence of the COVID-19 pandemic itself is distributed [293].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [293] Chamola, 2020, A comprehensive review of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of IoT, drones, AI, blockchain, and 5G in managing its impact, IEEE Access source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the blockchain computing model, the implementation of homomorphic encryption technology has promising potential to secure user data and can allow mining to preserve user's privacy.
“In the blockchain computing model, the implementation of homomorphic encryption technology has promising potential to secure user data and can allow mining to preserve user's privacy [282].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [282] Shrestha, 2019, Integration of IoT with blockchain and homomorphic encryption: challenging issues and opportunities, Adv. Comput. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe four datasets have been fed into five different classifiers to study the feasibility of a machine learning algorithm in selecting an appropriate storage medium.
“The four datasets have been fed into five different classifiers to study the feasibility of a machine learning algorithm in selecting an appropriate storage medium.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe dataset represents data storage requirements and user's preferences regarding the archive of their health data.
“The dataset represents data storage requirements and user's preferences regarding the archive of their health data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenTo cope with COVID-19 issues, distributed ledger technology such as blockchain can be highly advantageous, but this technology cannot guarantee users' privacy.
“To cope with COVID-19 issues, distributed ledger technology, such as blockchain, can be highly advantageous but this technology cannot guarantee users' privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisecitationThe diverse data blocks with different features and health repositories with their performance measuring factors are fed to the machine learning model as input.
“The diverse data blocks with different features and health repositories with their performance measuring factors are fed to the upper portion of the model as input.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe performance was analyzed with respect to accuracy and root mean square errors.
“The performance was analyzed with respect to the accuracy, and root means square errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe abusive use of blockchain in shadowy trading sites has resulted in different scandals such as now-defunct Silk because currently, blockchain is largely unregulated.
“Nonetheless, the abusive use of blockchain in shadowy trading sites has resulted in different scandals such as now-defunct Silk because currently, blockchain is largely unregulated [296].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [296] Peter, 2017, Regulatory issues in blockchain technology, J. Financ. Regul. Compl.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSeveral processes such as correlation coefficient analysis, heuristics rules, distance measurements and user preferences are applied to determine the repository for each data block.
“Several processes such as correlation coefficient analysis, heuristics rules, distance measurements and user preferences are applied to determine the repository for each data block.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe classifiers are trained using a variable size of the synthetic dataset in Weka ToolKits.
“The classifiers are trained using a variable size of the synthetic dataset in Weka ToolKits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe study generated a synthetic dataset having a variable number of instances.
“The study generated a synthetic dataset having a variable number of instances.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [281] Uddin, 2020, Dynamically recommending repositories for health data: a machine learning model
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationIn Nadeem et al.'s study, the scheme was not implemented.
“The scheme was not implemented.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [227] Nadeem, 2019, Securing cognitive radio vehicular ad hoc network with fog node based distributed blockchain cloud architecture, Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPokrovskaia et al. [298] emphasized on having regulation mechanism for tax, finance and society within the knowledge-driven economy.
“Pokrovskaia et al. [298] emphasized on having regulation mechanism for tax, finance and society within the knowledge-driven economy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298] Pokrovskaia, 2017, Tax, financial and social regulatory mechanisms within the knowledge-driven economy. Blockchain algorithms and fog computing for the efficient regulation
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThey highlighted the need of efficient regulation framework for blockchain and Fog computing.
“They highlighted the need of efficient regulation framework for blockchain and Fog computing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [298] Pokrovskaia, 2017, Tax, financial and social regulatory mechanisms within the knowledge-driven economy. Blockchain algorithms and fog computing for the efficient regulation
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationLaw can be made a product using a smart contract of the blockchain.
“Law can be made a product using a smart contract of the blockchain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLessig [284] described four means: law, social norms, and economic means for appropriately regulating any applications on the cyberspace.
“Lessig [284] described four means: law, social norms, and economic means for appropriately regulating any applications on the cyberspace.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [284] Lawrence, 1999, The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach, Harv. Law Rev. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationThe smart contract technology that turns the law into code on the blockchain can enact laws.
“However, the smart contract technology that turns the law into code on the blockchain can enact laws.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTo deal with tracking and regulating blockchain, an IoT application oriented smart Agent can be adopted to configure social norms and implement laws for the blockchain applications.
“To deal with tracking and regulating blockchain, IoT application oriented smart Agent can be adopted to configure social norms and implement laws for the blockchain applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenBitcoin has a strong security architecture but other means of regulation have not been still developed.
“Fig. 26 (b) depicts that Bitcoin has a strong security architecture but other means of regulation have not been still developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe sustainability and adaptability of blockchain technology depend on effective regulation and monitoring.
“The sustainability and adaptability of blockchain technology depend on effective regulation and monitoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFilippi et al. [297] presented the blockchain as a transformer from 'Code is a law' to 'Law is Code'.
“Filippi et al. [297] presented the blockchain as a transformer from”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [297] Hassan, 2017, The expansion of algorithmic governance: from code is law to law is code, Field Actions Sci. Rep.
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationBlockchain oriented IoT applications can be effectively regulated by combining these four means.
“Blockchain oriented IoT applications can be effectively regulated by combining these four means.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: No legislation is still enacted for governing the existing blockchain applications.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenConventional law cannot regulate blockchain because of blockchain's decentralized properties.
“Conventional law cannot regulate blockchain because of blockchain's decentralized properties.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningAn agent enabled blockchain IoT architecture can define four norms of regulating technology including social norms and laws that are absent in the current cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.
“Fig. 26 (b) shows that an agent enabled blockchain IoT architecture can define four norms of regulating technology including social norms and laws that are absent in the current cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenA variety of technological and security issues in IoT remain unaddressed.
“Nonetheless, a variety of technological and security issues in IoT remain unaddressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
PoW prevents malicious, Sybil attacks and makes the blocks tamper-proof.
“On the contrary, PoW prevents malicious, Sybil attacks and makes the blocks tamper-proof.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The blockchain throughput is limited thanks to its complex cryptographic security protocol and consensus mechanisms.
“The blockchain throughput is limited thanks to its complex cryptographic security protocol and consensus mechanisms.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The IoT has limited capabilities to connect them with blockchain technology in order to provide novel business opportunities for the implementation of new applications and services in various domains.
“The IoT has limited capabilities to connect them with blockchain technology in order to provide novel business opportunities for the implementation of new applications and services in various domains.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Blockchain can guarantee transparency of transactions, which is essential in some applications like finance.
“Blockchain can guarantee transparency of transactions, which is essential in some applications like finance.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Due to the absence of governance, records cannot be filtered for maintaining privacy before publishing them on the blockchain.
“In addition, due to the absence of governance, records cannot be filtered for maintaining privacy before publishing them on the blockchain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Actions resulting from executing code such as smart contracts on a DTL can breach law.
“Actions resulting from executing code such as smart contracts on a DTL can breach law.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Due to the anonymity of the DTL, it is not so straightforward to distinguish the parties carrying out transactions for illegal services.
“Due to the anonymity of the DTL, it is not so straightforward to distinguish the parties carrying out transactions for illegal services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Research has shown that by using disruptive technologies such as blockchain, these issues can be minimized.
“Research has shown that by using disruptive technologies such as blockchain, these issues can be minimized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The high computational power required to run blockchain algorithms has slowed down the advancement of these technology-based applications on resource constrained devices.
“The high computational power required to run blockchain algorithms has slowed down the advancement of these technologybased applications on resource constrained devices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Difficulties in regularly updating firmware for millions of smart devices from a point of security and maintenance perspective.
“difficulties in regularly updating firmware for millions of smart devices from a point of security and maintenance perspective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The distributed ledger in blockchain is tamper-resistant and removes the need to trust participating parties.
“The distributed ledger in the blockchain is a tamper-resistant, which removes the need to trust the participating parties.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cloud computing has virtually unlimited storage and computational resources.
“Meanwhile, Cloud computing has virtually unlimited storage and computational resources that can deliver on-demand, reliable, and secure IoT services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Not all blockchain consensus mechanisms are suitable in a Fog ecosystem due to their limited resources.
“Further, Not all blockchain consensus mechanisms are suitable in a Fog ecosystem due to their limited resources.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Only a few countries, including Estonia and Peru, have already adopted blockchain health management in practice.
“However, only a few countries, including Estonia, Peru, have already adopted blockchain health management in practice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data interception can occur when IoT devices transfer data between them, questioning the reliability of the collected data.
“Further, the data interception can occur when IoT devices transfer data between them which questions the reliability of the collected data.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IoT devices have no accurate information available about the agents in a new environment.
“However, IoT devices have no accurate information available about the agents in a new environment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IoT devices are often unknown and not referenced, and the traditional approach of asking other trusted agents for information is usually impracticable.
“Further, IoT devices are often unknown and not referenced, and the traditional approach of asking other trusted agents for information is usually impracticable.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The IoT devices in a smart home are usually connected to global internet and consumers via Gateway services.
“The IoT devices in a smart home are usually connected to global internet and consumers via Gateway services.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patient monitoring systems continuously stream health data and transactions are more frequently created in such applications.
“Patient monitoring system continuously streams health data and transactions are more frequently created in such applications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No legislation is still enacted for governing the existing blockchain applications.
“No legislation is still enacted for governing the existing blockchain applications.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Centralized data-sharing systems have limitations including data privacy and security concerns, interoperability issues, and single points of failure.
“However, centralized data-sharing systems have limitations, such as data privacy and security concerns [5]interoperability issues [6], and single points of failure [7].”
From Federated learning meets blockchain in decentralized data-sharing: Healthcare use case (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
On-chain storage cost is described as both high and low
MinorThe same section first says inserting a block on-chain has a high cost, then says the on-chain storage method has a low cost because a hash is small. The latter appears to describe the off-chain method introduced between these statements.
“But, blockchain demands high cost to insert a block on-chain [183].”
“The storage cost in the on-chain method is low because the size of the hash value is relatively small [184].”
BCPay blockchain type is both specified and said to be unspecified
MinorTable 17 assigns Zhang et al. [212] the blockchain type EEB and lists Ethereum as its tool, but the accompanying assessment says the kind of blockchain used was not highlighted.
“Zhang et al. [212] EEB SM ✓ ✓ OnC Ethereum”
“However, blockchain-based implementation has not been done and which kind of blockchain used was not highlighted.”
Conflicting claims about resistance to DDoS attacks
MinorThe security discussion says blockchain can withstand DDoS attacks but later calls it susceptible to DDoS attacks, without distinguishing the circumstances.
“Although blockchain can withstand major security attacks such as Sybil, Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), selfish mining and Ransomware attacks, the existing blockchain has some inherent security flaws.”
“Still, blockchain technology is susceptible to a message hijack, and DDoS attacks and these attacks are the most common on blockchain networks [32].”
Cites
A detailed analysis of the KDD CUP 99 data set
Tavallaee, M., Bagheri, E., Lu, W., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Security and Defense Applications · doi:10.1109/cisda.2009.5356528 · Cited by 5,396 · see citing works
(2013) · Cited by 5,372 · see citing works
IoT security: Review, blockchain solutions, and open challenges
Khan, M. A., & Salah, K. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.022 · Cited by 2,488 · see citing works
On blockchain and its integration with IoT. Challenges and opportunities
Reyna, A., Martín, C., Chen, J., Soler, E., & Díaz, M. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.05.046 · Cited by 1,908 · see citing works
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2017.7917634 · Cited by 1,843 · see citing works
A Survey on IoT Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Saxena, V., Jain, D., Goyal, P., & Sikdar, B. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2924045 · Cited by 1,445 · see citing works
A review of internet of things for smart home: challenges and solutions
Risteska Stojkoska, B. L., & Trivodaliev, K. V. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.006 · Cited by 1,397 · see citing works
Blockchain for internet of things: a survey
Dai, H.-N., Zheng, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2920987 · Cited by 1,246 · see citing works
MeDShare: Trust-Less Medical Data Sharing Among Cloud Service Providers via Blockchain
Xia, Q., Sifah, E. B., Asamoah, K. O., Gao, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2730843 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Prediction
Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.03604 · Cited by 1,148 · see citing works
Chamola, V., Hassija, V., Gupta, V., & Guizani, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2992341 · Cited by 1,099 · see citing works
Blockchain for AI: review and open research challenges
Salah, K., Rehman, M. H. U., Nizamuddin, N., & Al-Fuqaha, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2890507 · Cited by 1,001 · see citing works
Blockchain-based electronic healthcare record system for healthcare 4.0 applications
Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., & Evans, R. D. (2019) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2019.102407 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
Healthcare blockchain system using smart contracts for secure automated remote patient monitoring
Griggs, K. N., Ossipova, O., Kohlios, C. P., Baccarini, A. N., Howson, E. A., & Hayajneh, T. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0982-x · Cited by 926 · see citing works
An Identity-Based Signature from Gap Diffie-Hellman Groups
Cha, J. C., & Cheon, J. H. (2002) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36288-6_2 · Cited by 919 · see citing works
Federated Learning for Internet of Things: Recent Advances, Taxonomy, and Open Challenges
Khan, L. U., Saad, W., Han, Z., Hossain, E., & Hong, C. S. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3090430 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
A decentralized privacy-preserving healthcare blockchain for IoT
Dwivedi, A. D., Srivastava, G., Dhar, S., & Singh, R. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19020326 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey on Attacks, Security Issues and Blockchain Solutions for IoT and IIoT
Sengupta, J., Ruj, S., & Das Bit, S. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102481 · Cited by 844 · see citing works
A survey on privacy protection in blockchain system
Feng, Q., He, D., Zeadally, S., Khan, M. K., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.10.020 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of the Use of Blockchain in Healthcare
Hölbl, M., Kompara, M., Kamišalić, A., & Nemec Zlatolas, L. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10100470 · Cited by 780 · see citing works
Hyperledger Fabric: A Distributed Operating System for Permissioned BlockchainsPreprint
Androulaki, E., Barger, A., Bortnikov, V., Cachin, C., Christidis, K., De, A., Enyeart, D., Ferris, C., Laventman, G., Manevich, Y., et al. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1801.10228 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
A Taxonomy of Blockchain-Based Systems for Architecture Design
Xu, X., Weber, I. M., Staples, M., Zhu, L., Bosch, J., Bass, L., Pautasso, C., & Rimba, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA) · doi:10.1109/icsa.2017.33 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Blockchain for industry 4.0: a comprehensive review
Bodkhe, U., Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., Khanpara, P., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988579 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
The Scyther Tool: Verification, Falsification, and Analysis of Security Protocols
Cremers, C. J. F. (2008) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70545-1_38 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Blockchain and IoT Integration: A Systematic Survey
Panarello, A., Tapas, N., Merlino, G., Longo, F., & Puliafito, A. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18082575 · Cited by 756 · see citing works
Integrating blockchain for data sharing and collaboration in mobile healthcare applications
Liang, X., Zhao, J., Shetty, S., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE 28th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2017.8292361 · Cited by 711 · see citing works
Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security
Lange, T., van Tilborg, H. C. A., & Jajodia, S. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-5906-5 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Xie, J., Yu, F. R., Huang, T., Xie, R., Liu, J., Wang, C., & Liu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2866942 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
Solutions to scalability of blockchain: a survey
Zhou, Q., Huang, H., Zheng, Z., & Bian, J. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2967218 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
How blockchain technologies impact your business model
Morkunas, V. J., Paschen, J., & Boon, E. (2019) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.01.009 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Performance Benchmarking and Optimizing Hyperledger Fabric Blockchain Platform
Thakkar, P., Nathan, S., & Viswanathan, B. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 26th International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems (MASCOTS) · doi:10.1109/mascots.2018.00034 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
MedBlock: Efficient and Secure Medical Data Sharing Via Blockchain
Fan, K., Wang, S., Ren, Y., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0993-7 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Wang, S., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2851611 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Blockchain Based Decentralized Management of Demand Response Programs in Smart Energy Grids
Pop, C. D., Cioara, T., Antal, C., Anghel, I. M., Salomie, I., & Bertoncini, M. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18010162 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Kang, J., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D., Ye, D., Kim, D. I., & Zhao, J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2019.2894944 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems
Mutlag, A. A., Abd Ghani, M. K., Arunkumar, N., Mohammed, M. A., & Mohd, O. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.07.049 · Cited by 590 · see citing works
BBDS: Blockchain-Based Data Sharing for Electronic Medical Records in Cloud Environments
Xia, Q., Sifah, E. B., Smahi, A., Amofa, S. K., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Information · doi:10.3390/info8020044 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Blockchain Technology in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review and Directions for Future Research
Khezr, S., Moniruzzaman, M., Yassine, A., & Benlamri, R. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9091736 · Cited by 575 · see citing works
Blockchain for Secure EHRs Sharing of Mobile Cloud Based E-Health Systems
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917555 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
Blockchain as a disruptive technology for business: A systematic review
Frizzo-Barker, J., Chow-White, P. A., Adams, P. R., Mentanko, J., Ha, D. T., & Green, S. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.10.014 · Cited by 574 · see citing works
When Mobile Blockchain Meets Edge Computing
Xiong, Z., Zhang, Y., Niyato, D. T., Wang, P., & Han, Z. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1701095 · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Bitcoin Mining and its Energy Footprint
O'Dwyer, K. J., & Malone, D. (2014) · doi:10.1049/cp.2014.0699 · Cited by 569 · see citing works
Towards secure industrial IoT: blockchain system with credit-based consensus mechanism
Huang, J., Kong, L., Chen, G., Wu, M.-Y., Liu, X., & Zeng, P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2903342 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
On the Integration of Cloud Computing and Internet of Things
Botta, A., de Donato, W., Persico, V., et al. (2014) · International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud (FiCloud) · doi:10.1109/ficloud.2014.14 · Cited by 532 · see citing works
Crowdbc: a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing
Li, M., Weng, J., Yang, A., Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Hou, L., Liu, J.-N., Xiang, Y., & Deng, R. H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2018.2881735 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Public and private blockchain in construction business process and information integration
Yang, R., Wakefield, R., Lyu, S., Jayasuriya, S., Han, F., Yi, X., Yang, X., Amarasinghe, G., & Chen, S. (2020) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103276 · Cited by 490 · see citing works
Blockchain based searchable encryption for electronic health record sharing
Chen, L., Lee, W.-K., Chang, C.-C., Choo, K.-K. R., & Zhang, N. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.01.018 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Survey on blockchain based smart contracts: Applications, opportunities and challenges
Hewa, T. M., Ylianttila, M., & Liyanage, M. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102857 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study
Macrinici, D., Cartofeanu, C., & Gao, S. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.004 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Distblocknet: a distributed blockchains-based secure SDN architecture for IoT networks
Sharma, P. K., Singh, S., Jeong, Y.-S., & Park, J. H. (2017) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2017.1700041 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
MedChain: efficient healthcare data sharing via Blockchain
Shen, B., Guo, J., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9061207 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
The law of the horse: what cyberlaw might teach
Lessig, L. (1999) · Harvard Law Review · doi:10.2307/1342331 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Secure cloud-based EHR system using attribute-based cryptosystem and blockchain
Wang, H., & Song, Y. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0994-6 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Blockchain as a confidence machine: The problem of trust & challenges of governance
De Filippi, P., Mannan, M., & Reijers, W. (2020) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101284 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Privacy-friendly platform for healthcare data in cloud based on blockchain environment
Omar, A. A., Bhuiyan, M. Z. A., Basu, A., Kiyomoto, S., & Rahman, M. S. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.12.044 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: A literature review
Karafiloski, E., & Mishev, A. (2017) · IEEE EUROCON - International Conference on Computer as a Tool (EUROCON) · doi:10.1109/eurocon.2017.8011213 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Blockchain applications for industry 4.0 and industrial IoT: a review
Alladi, T., Chamola, V., Parizi, R. M., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2956748 · Cited by 382 · see citing works
Blockchain-Enabled Security in Electric Vehicles Cloud and Edge Computing
Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Yang, T. (2018) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2018.1700344 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Blockchain with Internet of Things: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions
Electronic and Computer Science Dept., U. O. S., Atlam, H. F., Alenezi, A., Alassafi, M. O., & Wills, G. B. (2018) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications · doi:10.5815/ijisa.2018.06.05 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
The role of big data analytics in industrial Internet of Things
Rehman, M. H. U., Yaqoob, I., Salah, K., Imran, M. A., Jayaraman, P. P., & Perera, C. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.04.020 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Blockchain for IoT-based healthcare: background, consensus, platforms, and use cases
Ray, P. P., Dash, D., Salah, K., & Kumar, N. (2021) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2020.2963840 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Regulatory issues in blockchain technology
Yeoh, P. (2017) · Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance · doi:10.1108/jfrc-08-2016-0068 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Sidechain technologies in blockchain networks: an examination and state-of-the-art review
Singh, A., Click, K., Parizi, R. M., Zhang, Q., Dehghantanha, A., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.102471 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Jamil, F., Ahmad, S., Iqbal, N., & Kim, D. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20082195 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Blockchain for Internet of Energy management: Review, solutions, and challenges
Miglani, A., Kumar, N., Chamola, V., & Zeadally, S. (2020) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.01.014 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Yang, F., Zhou, W. M., Wu, Q., Long, R., Xiong, N. N., & Zhou, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2935149 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Luo, F., Dong, Z. Y., Liang, G., Murata, J., & Xu, Z. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2876612 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Blockchain and IoT-based cognitive edge framework for sharing economy services in a smart city
Rahman, M. A., Rashid, M. M., Hossain, M. S., Hassanain, E., Alhamid, M. F., & Guizani, M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2896065 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Scaling Blockchains: A Comprehensive Survey
Hafid, A. S., Hafid, A. S., & Samih, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3007251 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
TrustChain: Trust Management in Blockchain and IoT Supported Supply Chains
Malik, S., Dedeoglu, V., Kanhere, S. S., & Jurdak, R. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Blockchain (Blockchain) · doi:10.1109/blockchain.2019.00032 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Blockchain-based solutions to security and privacy issues in the internet of things
Yu, Y., Li, Y., Tian, J., & Liu, J. (2018) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2017.1800116 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
From blockchain consensus back to byzantine consensus
Gramoli, V. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.09.023 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Performance Evaluation of Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Survey
Fan, C., Ghaemi, S., Khazaei, H., & Musı́lek, P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3006078 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
A hybrid framework for multimedia data processing in IoT-healthcare using blockchain technology
Rathee, G., Sharma, A., Saini, H., Kumar, R., & Iqbal, R. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-019-07835-3 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Tamper-Resistant Mobile Health Using Blockchain Technology.
Ichikawa, D., Kashiyama, M., & Ueno, T. (2017) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.7938 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Edgechain: an edge-IoT framework and prototype based on blockchain and smart contracts
Pan, J., Wang, J., Hester, A., Alqerm, I., Liu, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2878154 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
A review of secure and privacy-preserving medical data sharing
Jin, H., Luo, Y., Li, P., & Mathew, J. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2916503 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
$\mathsf{LightChain}$: A Lightweight Blockchain System for Industrial Internet of Things
Liu, Y., Wang, K., Lin, Y., & Xu, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2904049 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Blockchain-based Personal Health Data Sharing System Using Cloud Storage
Zheng, X., Mukkamala, R. R., Vatrapu, R., & Ordieres-Mere, J. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2018.8531125 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
A User Authentication Scheme of IoT Devices using Blockchain-Enabled Fog Nodes
Almadhoun, R., Kadadha, M., Alhemeiri, M., Al-Shehhi, M. R., & Salah, K. (2018) · IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA) · doi:10.1109/aiccsa.2018.8612856 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
A Review of Blockchain Architecture and Consensus Protocols: Use Cases, Challenges, and Solutions
Ismail, L., & Materwala, H. (2019) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym11101198 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Best: blockchain-based secure energy trading in SDN enabled intelligent transportation system
Chaudhary, R., Jindal, A., Aujla, G. S., Aggarwal, S., Kumar, N., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2019) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2019.05.006 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
Kaur, H., Alam, M. A., Jameel, R., Mourya, A. K., & Chang, V. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-1007-5 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
BlockSecIoTNet: Blockchain-based decentralized security architecture for IoT network
Rathore, S., Kwon, B. W., & Park, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2019.06.019 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Applications of blockchain in unmanned aerial vehicles: A review
Alladi, T., Chamola, V., Sahu, N., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2020.100249 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Survey: sharding in blockchains
Yu, G., Wang, X., Yu, K., Ni, W., Zhang, J. A., & Liu, R. P. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2965147 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Continuous patient monitoring with a patient centric agent: a block architecture
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2846779 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Self-citationSmart Secure Sensing for IoT-Based Agriculture: Blockchain Perspective
Vangala, A., Das, A. K., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3012294 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Auction Mechanisms in Cloud/Fog Computing Resource Allocation for Public Blockchain Networks
Jiao, Y., Wang, P., Niyato, D., & Suankaewmanee, K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2019.2900238 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Integration of Blockchain and Cloud of Things: Architecture, Applications and Challenges
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3020092 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Lightweight blockchain for healthcare
Ismail, L., Materwala, H., & Zeadally, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2947613 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Searching an Encrypted Cloud Meets Blockchain: A Decentralized, Reliable and Fair Realization
Hu, S., Cai, C., Wang, Q., Wang, C., Luo, X., & Ren, K. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2018.8485890 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Sybillimit: a near-optimal social network defense against sybil attacks
Yu, H., Gibbons, P. B., Kaminsky, M., & Xiao, F. (2010) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2009.2034047 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
A Scalable Blockchain Framework for Secure Transactions in IoT
Biswas, S., Sharif, K., Li, F., Nour, B., & Wang, Y. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2874095 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Cloud-assisted secure ehealth systems for tamper-proofing EHR via blockchain
Cao, S., Zhang, G., Liu, P., Zhang, X., & Neri, F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.02.038 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Blockchain-Based Secure and Trustworthy Internet of Things in SDN-Enabled 5G-VANETs
Xie, L., Ding, Y., Yang, H., & Wang, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2913682 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Board on Health Sciences Policy, & Board on Health Care Services (2009) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/12458 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
A blockchain-based medical data sharing and protection scheme
Liu, X., Wang, Z., Jin, C., Li, F., & Li, G. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2937685 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
A Survey of Scalability Solutions on Blockchain
Kim, S., Kwon, Y., & Cho, S. (2018) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC) · doi:10.1109/ictc.2018.8539529 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
BLOCKBENCH: A Framework for Analyzing Private BlockchainsPreprint
Dinh, T. T. A., Wang, J., Chen, G., Liu, R. Z. Z., Ooi, B. C., & Tan, K. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04057 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Cloud-Assisted EHR Sharing With Security and Privacy Preservation via Consortium Blockchain
Wang, Y., Zhang, A., Zhang, P., & Wang, H. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2943153 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
A Survey on Supply Chain Security: Application Areas, Security Threats, and Solution Architectures
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Gupta, V., Jain, S., & Guizani, N. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3025775 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Iota Tangle: A cryptocurrency to communicate Internet-of-Things data
Silvano, W. F., & Marcelino, R. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.05.047 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Carpooling Using Blockchain-Assisted Vehicular Fog Computing
Li, M., Zhu, L., & Lin, X. (2018) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2868076 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
BLA: Blockchain-Assisted Lightweight Anonymous Authentication for Distributed Vehicular Fog Services
Yao, Y., Chang, X., Mišić, J., Mišić, V. B., & Li, L. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2892009 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
A Blockchain Connected Gateway for BLE-Based Devices in the Internet of Things
Cha, S.-C., Chen, J.-F., Su, C., & Yeh, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2799942 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Blockchain based Efficient and Robust Fair Payment for Outsourcing Services in Cloud Computing
Zhang, Y., Deng, R. H., Liu, X., & Zheng, D. (2018) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.06.018 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Figorilli, S., Antonucci, F., Costa, C., Pallottino, F., Raso, L., Castiglione, M., Pinci, E., Vecchio, D. D., Colle, G., Proto, A. R., et al. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18093133 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
A secure fish farm platform based on blockchain for agriculture data integrity
Hang, L., Ullah, I., & Kim, D. (2020) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2020.105251 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
PoBT: A Lightweight Consensus Algorithm for Scalable IoT Business Blockchain
Biswas, S., Sharif, K., Li, F., et al. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2958077 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
A Blockchain-Based Framework for Lightweight Data Sharing and Energy Trading in V2G Network
Hassija, V., Chamola, V., Garg, S., Krishna, D. N. G., Kaddoum, G., & Jayakody, D. N. K. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.2967052 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Blockchain Technology in Pharmaceutical Industry to Prevent Counterfeit Drugs
Haq, I., & Muselemu, O. (2018) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2018916579 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Bera, B., Saha, S., Das, A. K., Kumar, N., Lorenz, P., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.3000576 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Securing smart cities through blockchain technology: architecture, requirements, and challenges
Hakak, S., Khan, W. Z., Gilkar, G. A., Imran, M., & Guizani, N. (2020) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900178 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Security and privacy of smart cities: a survey, research issues and challenges
Sookhak, M., Tang, H., He, Y., & Yu, F. R. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2867288 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Privacy-preserving blockchain based IoT ecosystem using attribute-based encryption
Rahulamathavan, Y., Phan, R. C.-W., Rajarajan, M., Misra, S., & Kondoz, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS) · doi:10.1109/ants.2017.8384164 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Cryptographic primitives in blockchains
Wang, L., Shen, X., Li, J., Shao, J., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2018.11.003 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
A Blockchain-SDN-Enabled Internet of Vehicles Environment for Fog Computing and 5G Networks
Gao, J., Obour Agyekum, K. O.-B., Sifah, E. B., Acheampong, K. N., Xia, Q., Du, X., Guizani, M., & Xia, H. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2956241 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
The rise of “blockchain”: bibliometric analysis of blockchain study
Firdaus, A., Razak, M. F. A., Feizollah, A., Hashem, I. A. T., Hazim, M., & Anuar, N. B. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03170-4 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Privacy preservation in permissionless blockchain: A survey
Peng, L., Feng, W., Yan, Z., Li, Y., Zhou, X., & Shimizu, S. (2020) · Digital Communications and Networks · doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2020.05.008 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Lightweight IoT-based authentication scheme in cloud computing circumstance
Zhou, L., Li, X., Yeh, K., Su, C., & Chiu, W. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.08.038 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
zkCrowd: a hybrid blockchain-based crowdsourcing platform
Zhu, S., Cai, Z., Hu, H., Li, Y., & Li, W. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2941735 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Performance Modeling of Hyperledger Fabric (Permissioned Blockchain Network)
Sukhwani, H., Wang, N., Trivedi, K. S., & Rindos, A. (2018) · 2018 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA) · doi:10.1109/nca.2018.8548070 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Performance analysis of ethereum transactions in private blockchain
Rouhani, S., & Deters, R. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS) · doi:10.1109/icsess.2017.8342866 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Medchain: a design of blockchain-based system for medical records access and permissions management
Daraghmi, E.-Y., Daraghmi, Y.-A., & Yuan, S.-M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2952942 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Blockchain and fog based architecture for internet of everything in smart cities
Singh, P., Nayyar, A., Kaur, A., & Ghosh, U. (2020) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi12040061 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Distributed Ledger Technology: Blockchain Compared to Directed Acyclic Graph
Benčić, F. M., & Žarko, I. P. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs.2018.00171 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Ma, M., Shi, G., & Li, F. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2904042 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Privacy-preserved task offloading in mobile blockchain with deep reinforcement learning
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2020.3010967 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Blockchain technology toward green IoT: opportunities and challenges
Sharma, P. K., Kumar, N., & Park, J. H. (2020) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.001.1900526 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Digital signature scheme for information non-repudiation in blockchain: a state of the art review
Fang, W., Chen, W., Zhang, W., Pei, J., Gao, W., & Wang, G. (2020) · EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking · doi:10.1186/s13638-020-01665-w · Cited by 178 · see citing works
A detailed and real-time performance monitoring framework for blockchain systems
Zheng, P., Zheng, Z., Luo, X., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2018) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Practice (ICSE-SEIP) · doi:10.1145/3183519.3183546 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
EdgeMediChain: A Hybrid Edge Blockchain-Based Framework for Health Data Exchange
Akkaoui, R., Hei, X., & Cheng, W. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003575 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Zhao, Q., Chen, S., Liu, Z., et al. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102355 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Trust management in a blockchain based fog computing platform with trustless smart oracles
Kochovski, P., Gec, S., Stankovski, V., Bajec, M., & Drobintsev, P. D. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.030 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A Survey of Blockchain Applications in Different Domains
Chen, W., Xu, Z., Shi, S., Zhao, Y., & Zhao, J. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3301403.3301407 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Privacy-Preserved Task Offloading in Mobile Blockchain with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Nguyen, D. C., Pathirana, P. N., Ding, M., & Seneviratne, A. P. (2024) · Figshare · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Secure and Reliable IoT Networks Using Fog Computing with Software-Defined Networking and Blockchain
Muthanna, A., Ateya, A. A., Khakimov, A. A., Андреевна, Г. И., Abuarqoub, A., Samouylov, K. E., & Koucheryavy, A. (2019) · Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks · doi:10.3390/jsan8010015 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Islam, N., Faheem, Y., Din, I. U., Talha, M., Guizani, M., & Khalil, M. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.05.059 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
A blockchain-based smart home gateway architecture for preventing data forgery
Lee, Y., Rathore, S., Park, J. H., & Park, J. H. (2020) · Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences · doi:10.1186/s13673-020-0214-5 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
A Light and Secure Healthcare Blockchain for IoT Medical Devices
Srivastava, G., Crichigno, J., & Dhar, S. (2019) · Conference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · doi:10.1109/ccece.2019.8861593 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Medhane, D. V., Sangaiah, A. K., Hossain, M. S., Muhammad, G., & Wang, J. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2977196 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
A Blockchain-Powered Crowdsourcing Method With Privacy Preservation in Mobile Environment
Xu, X., Liu, Q., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Qi, L., & Dou, W. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2019.2909137 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Technical aspects of blockchain and IoT
Atlam, H. F., & Wills, G. B. (2018) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.10.006 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Kumar, G., Saha, R., Rai, M. K., Thomas, R., & Kim, T.-H. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2911969 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Recent patient health monitoring platforms incorporating internet of things-enabled smart devices
Kang, M., Park, E., Cho, B. H., & Lee, K.-S. (2018) · International Neurourology Journal · doi:10.5213/inj.1836144.072 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Integration of VANET and 5G Security: A review of design and implementation issues
Hussain, R., Hussain, F. A., & Zeadally, S. (2019) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2019.07.006 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Applications of Distributed Ledger Technologies to the Internet of Things
Zhu, Q., Loke, S. W., Trujillo-Rasúa, R., Jiang, F., & Xiang, Y. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3359982 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Blockchain based proxy re-encryption scheme for secure IoT data sharing
Manzoor, A. (2019) · VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) · doi:10.1109/bloc.2019.8751336 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Proxy re-encryption enabled secure and anonymous IoT data sharing platform based on blockchain
Manzoor, A., Braeken, A., Kanhere, S. S., Ylianttila, M., & Liyanage, M. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102917 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Secure and Efficient Data Accessibility in Blockchain Based Healthcare Systems
Ramani, V., Kumar, T., Braeken, A., Liyanage, M., & Ylianttila, M. (2018) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/glocom.2018.8647221 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Marelli, L., Lievevrouw, E., & Van Hoyweghen, I. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724929 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
A Novel EMR Integrity Management Based on a Medical Blockchain Platform in Hospital
Hang, L., Choi, E.-C., & Kim, D. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8040467 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Singh, S., Ra, I.-H., Meng, W., Kaur, M., & Cho, G. (2019) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1177/1550147719844159 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Blockchain and internet of things: a bibliometric study
Kamran, M., Khan, H. U., Nisar, W., Farooq, M., & Rehman, S.-U. (2020) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.106525 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Decentralized big data auditing for smart city environments leveraging blockchain technology
Yu, H., Yang, Z., & Sinnott, R. O. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2888940 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Proof of Authentication: IoT-Friendly Blockchains
Puthal, D., & Mohanty, S. P. (2019) · IEEE Potentials · doi:10.1109/mpot.2018.2850541 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Optimized Blockchain Model for Internet of Things based Healthcare Applications
Dwivedi, A. D., Malina, L., Dzurenda, P., & Srivastava, G. (2019) · International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.8769060 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Blockchain-based Firmware Update Scheme Tailored for Autonomous Vehicles
Baza, M., Nabil, M., Lasla, N., et al. (2019) · IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/wcnc.2019.8885769 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Blockchain leveraged decentralized IoT ehealth framework
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V. (2020) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100159 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationBlockchain-based healthcare workflow for tele-medical laboratory in federated hospital IoT clouds
Celesti, A., Ruggeri, A., Fazio, M., Galletta, A., Villari, M., & Romano, A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20092590 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Tuli, S., Tuli, S., Wander, G., Wander, P., Gill, S. S., Dustdar, S., Sakellariou, R., & Rana, O. (2020) · Internet Technology Letters · doi:10.1002/itl2.145 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Michelin, R. A., Dorri, A., Steger, M., Lunardi, R. C., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Zorzo, A. F. (2018) · EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous) · doi:10.1145/3286978.3287019 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Using Blockchain in a Reputation-Based Model for Grouping Agents in the Internet of Things
Fortino, G., Messina, F., Rosaci, D., & Sarnè, G. M. L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2019.2918162 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
IoT Public Fog Nodes Reputation System: A Decentralized Solution Using Ethereum Blockchain
Debe, M., Salah, K., Rehman, M. H. U., & Svetinovic, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2958355 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Systems and Blockchain: Results from a Systematic Literature Review
Calvaresi, D., Dubovitskaya, A., Calbimonte, J.-P., Taveter, K., & Schumacher, M. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94580-4_9 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Investigating the link between transaction and computational costs in a blockchain environment
Jabbar, A., & Dani, S. (2020) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1754487 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Alharby, M., & van Moorsel, A. (2019) · ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review · doi:10.1145/3308897.3308956 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Blockchain Evaluation Approaches: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspective
Smetanin, S., Ometov, A., Komarov, M. M., Mašek, P., & Koucheryavy, Y. A. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20123358 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Proof-of-Authentication for Scalable Blockchain in Resource-Constrained Distributed Systems
Puthal, D., Mohanty, S. P., Nanda, P., Kougianos, E., & Das, G. (2019) · International Conference on Consumer Electronics · doi:10.1109/icce.2019.8662009 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
An Efficient Forensics Architecture in Software-Defined Networking-IoT Using Blockchain Technology
Pourvahab, M., & Ekbatanifard, G. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2930345 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Blockchain-based searchable symmetric encryption scheme
Li, H., Tian, H., Zhang, F., & He, J. (2019) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.10.015 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
An IoT-Blockchain Architecture Based on Hyperledger Framework for Healthcare Monitoring Application
Attia, O., Khoufi, I., Laouiti, A., & Adjih, C. (2019) · IFIP International Conference on New Technologies, Mobility and Security (NTMS) · doi:10.1109/ntms.2019.8763849 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Performance Modeling of Hyperledger Sawtooth Blockchain
Ampel, B., Patton, M. W., & Chen, H. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI) · doi:10.1109/isi.2019.8823238 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
An efficient anti-quantum lattice-based blind signature for blockchain-enabled systems
Li, C., Tian, Y., Chen, X., & Li, J. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.08.032 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Yang, J., Onik, M. M. H., Lee, N.-Y., Ahmed, M., & Kim, C.-S. (2019) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app9071370 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
SSChain: A full sharding protocol for public blockchain without data migration overhead
Chen, H., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2019.101055 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Integration of IoT with blockchain and homomorphic encryption: challenging issues and opportunities
(2019) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2019.06.002 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Co-IoT: A Collaborative DDoS Mitigation Scheme in IoT Environment Based on Blockchain Using SDN
Houda, Z. A. E., Hafid, A. S., & Khoukhi, L. (2019) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9013542 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
A Parking Slot Allocation Framework Based on Virtual Voting and Adaptive Pricing Algorithm
Hassija, V., Saxena, V., Chamola, V., & Yu, F. R. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2020.2979637 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
IOTA-Next Generation Block chain
Divya, M., & Biradar, N. (2018) · International Journal Of Engineering And Computer Science · doi:10.18535/ijecs/v7i4.05 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
A Blockchain Model for Fair Data Sharing in Deregulated Smart Grids
Samuel, O., Javaid, N., Awais, M., Ahmed, Z., Imran, M. A., & Guizani, M. (2019) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9013372 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Traffic Jam Probability Estimation Based on Blockchain and Deep Neural Networks
Hassija, V., Gupta, V., Garg, S., & Chamola, V. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2988040 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Software defined networking architecture standardization
Schaller, S., & Hood, D. (2017) · Computer Standards & Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.csi.2017.01.005 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Towards Secure Network Computing Services for Lightweight Clients Using Blockchain
Xu, Y., Wang, G., Yang, J., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, C. (2018) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2018/2051693 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Blockchain-based Smart Contracts - Applications and ChallengesPreprint
Hu, Y., Liyanage, M., Mansoor, A., Thilakarathna, K., Jourjon, G., & Seneviratne, A. P. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04699 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Blockchain-Based Data Storage With Privacy and Authentication in Internet of Things
Goyat, R., Kumar, G., Alazab, M., Conti, M., Rai, M. K., Thomas, R., Saha, R., & Kim, T.-H. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.3019074 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Blockchain Technology
Saravanan, K. A., Balas, V. E., Julie, E. G., Robinson, Y. H., Balaji, S., & Kumar, R. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2019-0-00935-1 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Managing Smart Home Appliances with Proof of Authority and Blockchain
Singh, P. K., Singh, R., Nandi, S. K., & Nandi, S. (2019) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-22482-0_16 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
On-chain vs. off-chain storage for supply- and blockchain integration
Hepp, T., Sharinghousen, M., Ehret, P., et al. (2018) · it - Information Technology · doi:10.1515/itit-2018-0019 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Blockchain-Based Transaction Validation Protocol for a Secure Distributed IoT Network
Hosen, A. S. M. S., Singh, S., Sharma, P. K., Ghosh, U., Wang, J., Ra, I.-H., & Cho, G. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3004486 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Scalable and redactable blockchain with update and anonymity
Huang, K., Zhang, X., Mu, Y., Rezaeibagha, F., & Du, X. (2020) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2020.07.016 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Regulating blockchain, dlt and smart contracts: a technology regulator's perspective
Ellul, J., Galea, J., Ganado, M., Mccarthy, S., & Pace, G. J. (2020) · ERA Forum · doi:10.1007/s12027-020-00617-7 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Rimba, P., Tran, A. B., Weber, I., Staples, M., Ponomarev, A., & Xu, X. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-018-9876-1 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Softedgenet: SDN based energy-efficient distributed network architecture for edge computing
Sharma, P. K., Rathore, S., Jeong, Y.-S., & Park, J. H. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1700822 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
A Lightweight Blockchain Based Framework for Underwater IoT
Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasurbramanian, V. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8121552 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationBlockchain 2.0: Smart contracts
Aggarwal, S., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Advances in computers · doi:10.1016/bs.adcom.2020.08.015 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
2014 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering
(2014) · doi:10.1109/ic2e32576.2014 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Kim, T.-H., Kumar, G., Saha, R., Rai, M. K., Buchanan, W. J., Thomas, R., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2995481 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Energy Efficient Decentralized Authentication in Internet of Underwater Things Using Blockchain
Yazdinejad, A., Parizi, R. M., Srivastava, G., et al. (2019) · IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps) · doi:10.1109/gcwkshps45667.2019.9024475 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Elia, 2015, The rabin cryptosystem revisited. Applicable Algebra in engineering, Communication and Computing, 26, 251
- Nasir, 2018, vol. 2018, 3976093
- Wood, 2014, 151, 1
- Hassan, 2017, The expansion of algorithmic governance: from code is law to law is code, Field Actions Sci. Rep., 17, 88
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Federated learning meets blockchain in decentralized data-sharing: Healthcare use case
Alsamhi, S. H., Myrzashova, R., Hawbani, A., Kumar, S., Srivastava, S., Zhao, L., Wei, X., Guizan, M., & Curry, E. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3367249 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Alam, T. (2021) · Informatica · doi:10.31449/inf.v45i3.3573 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Uddin, M. A., Stranieri, A., Gondal, I., & Balasubramanian, V.
- Affiliations
- Federation University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Uddin, Md Ashraf
- Venue
- Blockchain: Research and Applications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100006
- ISSN
- 2096-7209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3133065136
- Semantic Scholar
- a1cdb81de39f32a8a0f51b33a84c13bbf0f18a4a
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 286
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 23
- FWCI
- 63.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Blockchain Research and Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
- Keywords
- blockchain, Internet of Things, blockchain adoption, fog computing, cloud IoT, Internet of Things security, privacy, single point of failure, firmware updates, e-health, smart cities, decentralized systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review