Cited by 105Information and Cyber SecurityEthics and Social Impacts of AIEthics in Business and Education

A principlist framework for cybersecurity ethics

Formosa, Paul, Wilson, Michael, Richards, Deborah·2021·Computers & Security

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102382

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Formosa, P., Wilson, M., & Richards, D.
Affiliations
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • Murdoch University (AU)
Corresponding author
Formosa, Paul
Venue
Computers & Security
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
109
Pages
102382
ISSN
0167-4048 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173450473
Cited by
105
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 2
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computers & Security (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
cybersecurity ethics, ethical principles, beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, explainability, penetration testing, DDoS attacks, ransomware, system administration, ethical expertise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review