The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE)
Abstract
Abstract Feature Extraction Algorithms (FEAs) aim to address the curse of dimensionality that makes machine learning algorithms incompetent. Our study conceptually and empirically explores the most representative FEAs. First, we review the theoretical background of many FEAs from different categories (linear vs. nonlinear, supervised vs. unsupervised, random projection-based vs. manifold-based), present their algorithms, and conduct a conceptual comparison of these methods. Secondly, for three challenging binary and multi-class datasets, we determine the optimal sets of new features and assess the quality of the various transformed feature spaces in terms of statistical significance and power analysis, and the FEA efficacy in terms of classification accuracy and speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
(2008) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · Cited by 33,051
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K., & Shields, M. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,059
Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction by Locally Linear Embedding
Roweis, S. T., & Saul, L. K. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2323 · Cited by 14,965
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
Abdi, H., & Williams, L. J. (2010) · WIREs Computational Statistics · doi:10.1002/wics.101 · Cited by 11,104
Principal component analysis: A review and recent developments
Jolliffe, I. T., & Cadima, J. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 · Cited by 10,117
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.001.0001 · Cited by 8,890
Laplacian Eigenmaps for Dimensionality Reduction and Data Representation
Belkin, M., & Niyogi, P. (2003) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976603321780317 · Cited by 7,621
Hawkins, D. M. (2004) · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · doi:10.1021/ci0342472 · Cited by 2,522
Cited by
Li, X., Zhu, R., Shi, C., Yang, X., Chen, J., & Wei, K. (2024) · Heritage Science · doi:10.1186/s40494-024-01387-y · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Anowar, F., Sadaoui, S., & Selim, B.
- Venue
- Computer Science Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 100378
- ISSN
- 1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3131860561
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 47.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100378
- The paper
- Anowar, F., Sadaoui, S., & Selim, B. (2021). Conceptual and empirical comparison of dimensionality reduction algorithms (PCA, KPCA, LDA, MDS, SVD, LLE, ISOMAP, LE, ICA, t-SNE). Computer Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100378
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
