Cited by 2,522Statistical Methods and ApplicationsSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesStatistical Methods and Inference

The problem of overfitting.

Hawkins, Douglas M.·2004·Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEArticleNEXTThe Problem of OverfittingDouglas M. HawkinsView Author Information School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 Cite this: J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1, 1–12Publication Date (Web):December 2, 2003Publication History Received30 October 2003Published online2 December 2003Published inissue 1 January 2004https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ci0342472https://doi.org/10.1021/ci0342472research-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2004 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views19627Altmetric-Citations1642LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access options SUBJECTS:Calibration,Hydrocarbons,Quality management,Testing and assessment,Transition temperature Get e-Alerts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ci0342472

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based upon ResNet, many studies have managed to improve the performance of the original ResNet, such as pre-activation ResNet, wide ResNet, stochastic depth ResNets (SDR), and ResNet in ResNet (RiR).

    “Based upon ResNet, many studies have managed to improve the performance of the original ResNet, such as pre-activation ResNet [38], wide ResNet [39], stochastic depth ResNets (SDR) [40], and ResNet in ResNet (RiR) [41].”
  • No matter how many layers a neural network has, if it uses linear activation, the output is always a linear combination of the input, meaning hidden layers have no effect.

    “He et al. [38] verify no matter how many layers the neural network has, the output is always a linear combination of the input, which means hidden layers have no effect.”
  • Nonlinear models, together with the use of a significant amount of descriptors lacking physical meaning, offer the risk of producing excellent performance indexes due to overfitting and/or bias to the training set construction.

    “Together with the use of a significant amount of descriptors lacking physical meaning, nonlinear models offer the risk of producing excellent performance indexes due to overfitting and/or bias to the training set construction (e.g., capturing the rules adopted during the selection of active and decoy compounds) (Hawkins, 2004; Abu-Mostafa et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkins, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Hawkins, Douglas M.
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
Published
2003-12-02
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0095-2338 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2213612645
Cited by
2,522
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 248 · 2024: 239 · 2023: 208 · 2022: 223 · 2021: 258 · 2020: 220 · 2019: 141 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 39
FWCI
29.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Air Force
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
overfitting, calibration, model validation, transition temperature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review