The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019
Abstract
Abstract This paper gives a comprehensive revision of the state-of-the-art research in detecting financial fraud from 2009 to 2019 inclusive and classifying them based on their types of fraud and data mining technology utilized in detecting financial fraud. The review result yielded a sample of 75 relevant articles (58 conference papers with 17 peer-reviewed journal articles) that are categorized into four main groups (bank fraud, insurance fraud, financial statement fraud, and cryptocurrency fraud). The study shows that 34 data mining techniques were used to identify fraud throughout various financial applications. The SVM is found to be one of the most widely used financial fraud detection techniques that carry about 23% of the overall study, followed by both Naive Bayes and Random Forest, resulting in 15%. The results of our comprehensive review revealed that most data mining techniques are extensively implemented to bank fraud and insurance fraud with a total of 61 research studies out of 75 that constitute the largest portion equal to 81.33% of the overall number of papers. This review provides a good reference source in guiding the detection of financial fraud for both academic and practical industries with useful information on the most significant data mining techniques used and shows the list of countries that are exposed to financial fraud. Our review contributes by expanding the sample of the reviewed articles that were not included by previous research and presents a summary of the prominent works done by various researchers in the field of financial fraud.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Statistical Fraud Detection: A Review
Bolton, R. J., & Hand, D. J. (2002) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1042727940 · Cited by 1,450
Ngai, E. W. T., Hu, Y., Wong, Y. H., Chen, Y., & Sun, X. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.006 · Cited by 1,361
Data mining for credit card fraud: a comparative study
Bhattacharyya, S., Jha, S., Tharakunnel, K., & Westland, J. C. (2011) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.08.008 · Cited by 1,108
A Comparative Evaluation of Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Multivariate Data
Goldstein, M., & Uchida, S. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152173 · Cited by 1,032
Fraud detection system: A survey
Abdallah, A., Maarof, M. A., & Zainal, A. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.04.007 · Cited by 708
Data mining techniques and applications – A decade review from 2000 to 2011
Liao, S.-H., Chu, P.-H., & Hsiao, P.-Y. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.063 · Cited by 665
Credit card fraud detection using machine learning techniques: A comparative analysis
Awoyemi, J. O., Adetunmbi, A. O., & Oluwadare, S. A. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on Computing Networking and Informatics (ICCNI) · doi:10.1109/iccni.2017.8123782 · Cited by 625
Survey on Anomaly Detection using Data Mining Techniques
Agrawal, S., & Agrawal, J. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.220 · Cited by 595
Intelligent financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review
West, J., & Bhattacharya, M. (2016) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.09.005 · Cited by 592
Cited by
Is artificial intelligence improving the audit process?
Fedyk, A., Hodson, J., Khimich, N., & Fedyk, T. (2022) · Review of Accounting Studies · doi:10.1007/s11142-022-09697-x · Cited by 461
Akasheh, M. A., Malik, E. F., Hujran, O., & Zaki, N. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121794 · Cited by 78
Understanding Data Quality in a Data-Driven Industry Context: Insights from the Fundamentals
Fu, Q., Nicholson, G. L., & Easton, J. M. (2024) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2024.100729 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P.
- Venue
- Computer Science Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 100402
- ISSN
- 1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159916456
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 101
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402
- The paper
- Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P. (2021). Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. Computer Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.