Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 375

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019

Al-Hashedi, Khaled Gubran, Magalingam, Pritheega·2021·Computer Science Review

Abstract

Abstract This paper gives a comprehensive revision of the state-of-the-art research in detecting financial fraud from 2009 to 2019 inclusive and classifying them based on their types of fraud and data mining technology utilized in detecting financial fraud. The review result yielded a sample of 75 relevant articles (58 conference papers with 17 peer-reviewed journal articles) that are categorized into four main groups (bank fraud, insurance fraud, financial statement fraud, and cryptocurrency fraud). The study shows that 34 data mining techniques were used to identify fraud throughout various financial applications. The SVM is found to be one of the most widely used financial fraud detection techniques that carry about 23% of the overall study, followed by both Naive Bayes and Random Forest, resulting in 15%. The results of our comprehensive review revealed that most data mining techniques are extensively implemented to bank fraud and insurance fraud with a total of 61 research studies out of 75 that constitute the largest portion equal to 81.33% of the overall number of papers. This review provides a good reference source in guiding the detection of financial fraud for both academic and practical industries with useful information on the most significant data mining techniques used and shows the list of countries that are exposed to financial fraud. Our review contributes by expanding the sample of the reviewed articles that were not included by previous research and presents a summary of the prominent works done by various researchers in the field of financial fraud.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Cited by

See all 375

Metadata

Authors
Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P.
Venue
Computer Science Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
40
Pages
100402
ISSN
1574-0137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159916456
Cited by
375
References
101
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402
The paper
Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P. (2021). Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. Computer Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2021.100402

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.