Understanding Data Quality in a Data-Driven Industry Context: Insights from the Fundamentals
Open accessAbstract
The increasing adoption of commercial-off-the-shelf infrastructure components and the rising integration of sensors into assets have led to a notable proliferation of operational data in industrial systems. As a result, a significant portion of investment and risk management decisions now heavily rely on the provenance and quality of heterogeneous data, sourced both internally and externally from specific industrial systems. This paper presents a review that covers three critical aspects of data quality: first, ensuring data quality through deliberate design; second, understanding the dynamic interplay between data and its users within sociotechnical systems; and third, attributing ongoing value to data resources as their roles evolve. These aspects are examined through a lens encompassing both traditional and the state-of-the-art theoretical frameworks for defining data quality. In addition, we incorporate insights from contemporary empirical research and highlight relevant industry standards and best practice guidelines. The synthesised insights serve as a practical foundation and reference for researchers and industry professionals alike, enabling them to refine and advance their understanding of data quality within the landscape of data-driven industries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Unity Technologies' Audience Pinpoint error (2022) resulted in USD 110 million in losses and a 37% decline in stock value due to poor input data leading to faulty algorithms.
“A striking example is Unity Technologies' Audience Pinpoint error (2022), where poor input data led to faulty algorithms, resulting in USD 110 million in losses and a 37% decline in stock value [72].”
From Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Cites
Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
Nederhof, A. J. (1985) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420150303 · Cited by 2,340 · see citing works
Industry 5.0: A survey on enabling technologies and potential applications
Maddikunta, P. K. R., Pham, Q.-V., B, P., Deepa, N., Dev, K., Gadekallu, T. R., Ruby, R., & Liyanage, M. (2022) · Journal of Industrial Information Integration · doi:10.1016/j.jii.2021.100257 · Cited by 1,890 · see citing works
AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(02)00043-5 · Cited by 1,611 · see citing works
Data governance: Organizing data for trustworthy Artificial Intelligence
Janssen, M., Brous, P., Estevez, E., Barbosa, L. S., & Janowski, T. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101493 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
Sensor data quality: a systematic review
Teh, H. Y., Kempa-Liehr, A. W., & Wang, K. I.-K. (2020) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-020-0285-1 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2022) · Computing Handbook · doi:10.1201/9780429171529-98 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. (2014) · Computing Handbook, Third Edition · doi:10.1201/b16768-7 · Cited by 103
Data Governance Model to Enhance Data Quality in Financial Institutions
Karkošková, S. (2023) · Information Systems Management · doi:10.1080/10580530.2022.2042628 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Data Quality in the Age of AI: A Review of Governance, Ethics, and the FAIR Principles
Guillen-Aguinaga, M., Aguinaga-Ontoso, E., Guillen-Aguinaga, L., Guillen-Grima, F., & Aguinaga-Ontoso, I. (2025) · Data · doi:10.3390/data10120201 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fu, Q., Nicholson, G. L., & Easton, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fu, Qian
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Information Integration
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-11
- Volume
- 42
- Pages
- 100729
- ISSN
- 2452-414X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404060462
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Industrial Information Integration (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Keywords
- data quality, industrial data, data management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review