The three perspectives on energy security: intellectual history, disciplinary roots and the potential for integration
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Within the context of broader energy security definitions, resilience is often considered as one of the energy security aspects.
“Within the context of broader energy security definitions, resilience is often considered as one of the energy security aspects [35,38,39,47,57].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Supply security of oil was the initial focus in energy security viewed through the geopolitical sovereignty perspective.
“Supply security of oil was the initial focus in energy security viewed through the geopolitical sovereignty perspective [39].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Currently, power systems show increasing vulnerability to weather variability, market variability, and disruptions in other systems.
“Currently, power systems show increasing vulnerability to weather variability [3,96], market variability (origin of resilience perspective in energy security studies [39]), and disruptions in other systems [6].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
The main oil security concerns involve import dependency, reliability of oil supplying countries, and security of transit routes.
“The main oil security concerns involved import dependency (share of imports and options to choose a supplier), reliability of oil supplying countries, and security of transit routes [39,50,80].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
The main measures to increase oil security concentrate on increasing upstream oil resource and extraction system control, diversification, and emergency stock capacity.
“The main measures to increase oil security concentrate on increasing the upstream oil resource and extraction system control, diversification (more suppliers or more fuels other than oil), and emergency stock capacity [39].”
From Energy system resilience – A review (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas
Ostrom, E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702288104 · Cited by 2,728 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For example, Ostrom’s [63] success in studying co-evolution of resource systems, their users and governance mechanisms shows the feasibility of co-analyzing scien-tific, economic, and policy variables in specific contexts and then using the results of such analyses to enrich more general theories.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Energy system resilience – A review
Jasiūnas, J., Lund, P. D., & Mikkola, J. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111476 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
“Cherp and Jewell [39] have tried to simplify the discussion by integrating robustness, sovereignty, and resilience perspectives into”
BackgroundInfluentialSecurity aspects of future renewable energy systems–A short overview
Johansson, B. (2013) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.023 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Do renewable energies improve energy security in the long run?
Hache, E. (2018) · International Economics · doi:10.1016/j.inteco.2018.01.005 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Fossil fuel subsidy reform, rent management and political fragmentation in developing countries
Lockwood, M. (2015) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2014.923826 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
China and Lithium Geopolitics in a Changing Global Market
Altiparmak, S. O. (2023) · Chinese Political Science Review · doi:10.1007/s41111-022-00227-3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cherp, A., & Jewell, J.
- Corresponding author
- Cherp, Aleh
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 202-212
- ISSN
- 1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119470640
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
- Keywords
- energy security, intellectual history, interdisciplinary research, interdisciplinary integration, energy security policy, complex systems analysis, electricity supply
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
