The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014 · Cited by 3,158
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
Engel, S., Pagiola, S., & Wunder, S. (2008) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.011 · Cited by 2,466 · cited 2×
“In a large number of cases, PES have contributed to reinforcing collective and individual conservation behavior as schemes have been characterized by low levels of environmental additionality and financial compensation [36,37,58 ].”
BackgroundEcosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes
Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G. D., & Bennett, E. M. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107 · Cited by 2,016
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
Gómez-Baggethun, E., de Groot, R., Lomas, P. L., & Montes, C. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.007 · Cited by 1,582
Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts
S., W. (2005) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/001760 · Cited by 1,535
Trade-offs across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services
Rodríguez, J. P., Beard, Jr., Bennett, E. M., Cumming, G. S., Cork, S. J., Agard, J., Dobson, A. P., & Peterson, G. D. (2006) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-01667-110128 · Cited by 1,430
Muradian, R., Corbera, E., Pascual, U., Kosoy, N., & May, P. H. (2010) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.006 · Cited by 1,174
Self-citationClassification of ecosystem services: Problems and solutions
Wallace, K. J. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.07.015 · Cited by 1,094
Cited by
Ten Years of REDD+: A Critical Review of the Impact of REDD+ on Forest-Dependent Communities
Bayrak, M., & Marafa, L. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070620 · Cited by 179
Franco, J. C., & Borras, S. M. (2019) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.013 · Cited by 150
Hunsberger, C., Corbera, E., Borras, S. M., Franco, J. C., Woods, K., Work, C., de la Rosa, R., Eang, V., Herre, R., Kham, S. S., et al. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue canadienne d'études du développement · doi:10.1080/02255189.2016.1250617 · Cited by 106
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbera, E.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 612-619
- ISSN
- 1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967988279
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 75
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.010
- The paper
- Corbera, E. (2012). Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.09.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
