The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impacts of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs: new perspectives and implications for coastal management and reef survival
Open accessAbstract
Anthropogenic nutrient enrichment is often associated with coral reef decline. Consequently, there is a large consent that increased nutrient influxes in reef waters have negative longterm consequences for corals. However, the mechanisms by which dissolved inorganic nutrients can disturb corals and their symbiotic algae are subject to controversial debate. Herein, we discuss recent studies that demonstrate how nutrient enrichment affects the heat and light stress tolerance of corals and their bleaching susceptibility. We integrate direct and indirect effects of nutrient enrichment on corals in a model that explains why healthy coral reefs can exist over a rather broad range of natural nutrient environments at the lower end of the concentration scale and that anthropogenic nutrient enrichment can disturb the finely balanced processes via multiple pathways. We conceptualise that corals can suffer from secondary negative nutrient effects due to the alteration of their natural nutrient environment by increased phytoplankton loads. In this context, we suggest that phytoplankton represents a likely vector that can translate nutrients effects, induced for instance by coastal run-off, into nutrient stress on coral reefs in considerable distance to the site of primary nutrient enrichment. The presented synthesis of the literature suggests that the effects of nutrient enrichment and eutrophication beyond certain thresholds are negative for the physiological performance of the coral individual and for ecosystem functioning. Hence, the immediate implementation of knowledge-based nutrient management strategies is crucial for coral reef survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biological and Chemical Response of the Equatorial Pacific Ocean to the 1997-98 El Niño
Chavez, F. P., Strutton, P. G., Friederich, G. E., Feely, R. A., Feldman, G. C., Foley, D. G., & McPhaden, M. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5447.2126 · Cited by 642
Vertical mixing and coral death in the Red Sea following the eruption of Mount Pinatubo
Genin, A., Lazar, B., & Brenner, S. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377507a0 · Cited by 313
Cited by
Zhao, H., Yuan, M., Strokal, M., Wu, H. C., Liu, X., Murk, A., Kroeze, C., & Osinga, R. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145017 · Cited by 143
Lesser, M. P. (2021) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biab101 · Cited by 66
A review of computational intelligence techniques in coral reef-related applications
Salcedo-Sanz, S., Cuadra, L., & Vermeij, M. J. A. (2016) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.01.008 · Cited by 27
Arnull, J., Hashim, A. S., Ziyadh, A. M., Carter, A. L., Moosa, H., Wilson, A. M. W., Ganeshram, R. S., & Tudhope, A. W. (2025) · Marine Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.marenvres.2025.107228 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- D’Angelo, C., & Wiedenmann, J.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 82-93
- ISSN
- 1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974182285
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.