Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity

Open access
Turnhout, Esther, Dewulf, Art, Hulme, Mike·2016·Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
DOI 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Hulme, 2010, Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge, Global Environ Change, 20, 558, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Turnhout, 2011, Databases, scaling practices and the globalization of biodiversity, Ecol Soc, 35, 35, 10.5751/ES-03981-160135 · DOI
  3. Robertson, 2006, The nature that capital can see: science, state and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environ Plan D: Soc Space, 24, 367, 10.1068/d3304 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Turnhout, 2013, Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to ‘living with’, Conserv Lett, 6, 154, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Luke, 1995, On environmentality: geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourses of contemporary environmentalism, Cultural Crit, 31, 57, 10.2307/1354445 · doi:10.2307/1354445
  6. Stocker, 2014, Rethink IPCC reports, Nature, 513
  7. Mahony, 2012, Model migrations: mobility and boundary crossings in regional climate prediction, Trans Inst Britisch Geographers, 37, 197, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00473.x · DOI
  8. Nielsen, 2012, Earth System Science, the IPCC and the problem of downward causation in human geographies of global climate change, Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish J Geogr, 112, 194, 10.1080/00167223.2012.741885 · DOI
  9. Purves, 2013, Ecosystems: time to model all life on earth, Nature, 493, 295, 10.1038/493295a · DOI · Paper page
  10. Turnhout, 2014, ‘Measurementality’ in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), Environ Plan A, 46, 581, 10.1068/a4629 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Jasanoff, 2010, A new climate for society, Theory Culture Soc, 27, 233, 10.1177/0263276409361497 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hulme, 2015, Climate and its changes: a cultural appraisal, GEO: Geogr Environ
  13. Ford, 2012, Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: climate change and Indigenous populations in WGII, Climatic Change, 113, 201, 10.1007/s10584-011-0350-z · DOI
  14. Turnhout, 2012, Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience, Nature, 488, 454, 10.1038/488454a · DOI · Paper page
  15. Radcliffe, 2010, Environmentalist thinking and/in geography, Progr Hum Geogr, 34, 98, 10.1177/0309132509338749 · DOI
  16. Rudiak-Gould, 2014, Progress, decline and the public uptake of climate science, Public Understanding Sci, 23, 142, 10.1177/0963662512444682 · DOI
  17. Nature, 2010, Editorial: wanted: an IPCC for biodiversity, Nature, 465, 525, 10.1038/465525a · doi:10.1038/465525a
  18. Brooks, 2014, IPBES ≠ IPCC, Trends Ecol Evol, 29, 543, 10.1016/j.tree.2014.08.004 · DOI
  19. Beck, 2014, The co-production of scale and power: the case of the millennium ecosystem assessment and the intergovernmental platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services, J Environ Policy Plan
  20. Curvelo, 2013, Imag[in]ing geoengineering—the plausible and the implausible, Int J Foresight Innovation Policy, 9, 162, 10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058613 · doi:10.1504/ijfip.2013.058613
  21. Luers, 2013, The difficult, the dangerous and the catastrophic: managing the spectrum of climate risks, Earth's Future, 2, 114, 10.1002/2013EF000192 · DOI
  22. Victor, 2014, Climate policy: ditch the 2°C warming goal, Nature, 514, 30, 10.1038/514030a · DOI
  23. Pattberg, 2010, Public-private partnerships in global climate governance, WIREs Climate Change, 1, 279, 10.1002/wcc.38 · DOI
  24. Moss, 2013, Hell and high water: practice-relevant adaptation science, Science, 342, 696, 10.1126/science.1239569 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Beck, 2011, Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation, Regional Environ Change, 11, 297, 10.1007/s10113-010-0136-2 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Watson, 2005, Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface, Philos Trans Biol Sci, 360, 471, 10.1098/rstb.2004.1601 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Jax, 2013, Ecosystem services and ethics, Ecol Econ, 93, 260, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Turnhout, 2014, Technocratic and economic ideals in the ecosystem services discourse, Conserv Let, 7, 336, 10.1111/conl.12069 · DOI
  29. Kosoy, 2010, Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism, Ecol Econ, 69, 1228, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Beck, 2014, Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES, Gaia, 23, 80, 10.14512/gaia.23.2.4 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Borie, 2015, Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between Mother Earth and ecosystem services, Environ Sci Policy, 54, 487, 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Soberón, 2015, Biodiversity governance: a tower of Babel of scales and cultures, PLOS Biol, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002108 · DOI
  33. Biermann, 2012, Navigating the Anthropocene: improving earth system governance, Science, 335, 1306, 10.1126/science.1217255 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Lövbrand, 2009, Earth system governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene, Global Environ Change, 19, 7, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Gupta, 2012, In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems, Curr Opin Environ Sustain, 4, 726, 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004 · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.004
  36. Steffen, 2015, Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet, Science, 347, 6223, 10.1126/science.1259855 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Robertson, 2012, Measurement and alienation: making a world of ecosystem services, Trans Inst Br Geogr, 37, 386, 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00476.x · DOI · Paper page
  38. Mahony, 2014, The predictive state: science, territory and the future of the Indian climate, Social Studies Sci, 44, 109, 10.1177/0306312713501407 · DOI
  39. Perrings, 2011, The biodiversity and ecosystem services science–policy interface, Science, 331, 1139, 10.1126/science.1202400 · DOI · Paper page
  40. John, 2015, The example of the IPCC does not vindicate the Value Free Ideal: a reply to Gregor Betz, Eur J Philos Sci, 5, 1, 10.1007/s13194-014-0095-4 · DOI

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., & Hulme, M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
18
Pages
65-72
ISSN
1877-3435 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004
OpenAlex
W2144985825
Cited by
193
References
4
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004
The paper
Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., & Hulme, M. (2016). What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.