The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Progress in the atomic-scale modeling of matter over the past decade has been tremendous. This progress has been brought about by improvements in methods for evaluating interatomic forces that work by either solving the electronic structure problem explicitly, or by computing accurate approximations of the solution and by the development of techniques that use the Born–Oppenheimer (BO) forces to move the atoms on the BO potential energy surface. As a consequence of these developments it is now possible to identify stable or metastable states, to sample configurations consistent with the appropriate thermodynamic ensemble, and to estimate the kinetics of reactions and phase transitions. All too often, however, progress is slowed down by the bottleneck associated with implementing new optimization algorithms and/or sampling techniques into the many existing electronic-structure and empirical-potential codes. To address this problem, we are thus releasing a new version of the i-PI software. This piece of software is an easily extensible framework for implementing advanced atomistic simulation techniques using interatomic potentials and forces calculated by an external driver code. While the original version of the code (Ceriotti et al., 2014) was developed with a focus on path integral molecular dynamics techniques, this second release of i-PI not only includes several new advanced path integral methods, but also offers other classes of algorithms. In other words, i-PI is moving towards becoming a universal force engine that is both modular and tightly coupled to the driver codes that evaluate the potential energy surface and its derivatives. Program summary Program Title: i-PI Program Files doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/x792grbm9g.1 Licensing provisions: GPLv3, MIT Programming language: Python External routines/libraries: NumPy Nature of problem: Lowering the implementation barrier to bring state-of-the-art sampling and atomistic modeling techniques to ab initio and empirical potentials programs. Solution method: Advanced sampling methods, including path-integral molecular dynamics techniques, are implemented in a Python interface. Any electronic structure code can be patched to receive the atomic coordinates from the Python interface, and to return the forces and energy that are used to integrate the equations of motion, optimize atomic geometries, etc. Restrictions: This code does not compute interatomic potentials, although the distribution includes sample driver codes that can be used to test different techniques using a few simple model force fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics
Plimpton, S. (1995) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 · Cited by 44,721
Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling
Bussi, G., Donadio, D., & Parrinello, M. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2408420 · Cited by 18,089
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 8,560
Practical methods of optimization
(1988) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(88)90129-2 · Cited by 5,818
Laio, A., & Parrinello, M. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.202427399 · Cited by 5,626
Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding
Sugita, Y., & Okamoto, Y. (1999) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(99)01123-9 · Cited by 4,514
A reactive potential for hydrocarbons with intermolecular interactions
Stuart, S. J., Tutein, A. B., & Harrison, J. A. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481208 · Cited by 4,436
Practical Methods of Optimization.
Witzgall, C., & Fletcher, R. (1989) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.2307/2008742 · Cited by 3,591
Well-Tempered Metadynamics: A Smoothly Converging and Tunable Free-Energy Method
Barducci, A., Bussi, G., & Parrinello, M. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.020603 · Cited by 3,184
PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics
Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Bussi, G., Camilloni, C., Provasi, D., Raiteri, P., Donadio, D., Marinelli, F., Pietrucci, F., Broglia, R. A., et al. (2009) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.05.011 · Cited by 1,875
Cited by
Kühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., Rybkin, V. V., Seewald, P., Stein, F., Laino, T., Khaliullin, R. Z., Schütt, O., Schiffmann, F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0007045 · Cited by 4,468
Self-citationUnke, O. T., Chmiela, S., Sauceda, H. E., Gastegger, M., Poltavsky, I., Schütt, K. T., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111 · Cited by 1,647
Self-citationBarely porous organic cages for hydrogen isotope separation
Liu, M., Zhang, L., Little, M. A., Kapil, V., Ceriotti, M., Yang, S., Ding, L., Holden, D. L., Balderas-Xicohténcatl, R., He, D., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aax7427 · Cited by 399
Self-citationBocus, M., Goeminne, R., Lamaire, A., Cools-Ceuppens, M., Verstraelen, T., & Van Speybroeck, V. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36666-y · Cited by 67
Self-citationBlum, V., Asahi, R., Autschbach, J., Bannwarth, C., Bihlmayer, G., Blügel, S., Burns, L. A., Crawford, T. D., Dawson, W., de Jong, W. A., et al. (2024) · Electronic Structure · doi:10.1088/2516-1075/ad48ec · Cited by 24
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kapil, V., Rossi, M., Marsalek, O., Petraglia, R., Litman, Y., Spura, T., Cheng, B., Cuzzocrea, A., Meißner, R. H., Wilkins, D. M., Helfrecht, B. A., Juda, P., Bienvenue, S. P., Fang, W., Kessler, J., Poltavsky, I., Vandenbrande, S., Wieme, J., Corminboeuf, C., Kühne, T. D., Manolopoulos, D. E., Markland, T. E., Richardson, J. O., Tkatchenko, A., Tribello, G. A., Van Speybroeck, V., & Ceriotti, M.
- Venue
- Computer Physics Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 236
- Pages
- 214-223
- ISSN
- 0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2886120629
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 64
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.09.020
- The paper
- Kapil, V., Rossi, M., Marsalek, O., Petraglia, R., Litman, Y., Spura, T., Cheng, B., Cuzzocrea, A., Meißner, R. H., Wilkins, D. M., Helfrecht, B. A., Juda, P., Bienvenue, S. P., Fang, W., Kessler, J., Poltavsky, I., Vandenbrande, S., Wieme, J., Corminboeuf, C., . . . Ceriotti, M. (2019). i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations. Computer Physics Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2018.09.020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.