Cited by 35Parallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesLow-Pressure Plasma Processing and DiagnosticsMagnetic confinement fusion research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficient GPU implementation of the Particle-in-Cell/Monte-Carlo collisions method for 1D simulation of low-pressure capacitively coupled plasmas

Open access
Juhasz, Zoltan, Ďurian, Ján, Derzsi, Aranka, Matejčík, Štefan, Donkó, Zoltán, Hartmann, Peter·2021·Computer Physics Communications

Abstract

In this paper, we describe an efficient, massively parallel GPU implementation strategy for speeding up one-dimensional electrostatic plasma simulations based on the Particle-in-Cell method with Monte-Carlo collisions. Relying on the Roofline performance model, we identify performance-critical points of the program and provide optimised solutions. We use four benchmark cases to verify the correctness of the CUDA and OpenCL implementations and analyse their performance properties on a number of NVIDIA and AMD cards. Plasma parameters computed with both GPU implementations differ not more than 2% from each other and respective literature reference data. Our final implementations reach over 2.6 Tflop/s sustained performance on a single card, and show speed up factors of up to 200 (when using 10 million particles). We demonstrate that GPUs can be very efficiently used for simulating collisional plasmas and argue that their further use will enable performing more accurate simulations in shorter time, increase research productivity and help in advancing the science of plasma simulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107913

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Turner, 2013, Phys. Plasmas, 20, 1, 10.1063/1.4775084 · DOI
  2. Liewer, 1989, J. Comput. Phys., 85, 302, 10.1016/0021-9991(89)90153-8 · DOI
  3. Decyk, 1995, Comput. Phys. Comm., 87, 87, 10.1016/0010-4655(94)00169-3 · DOI
  4. Ibrahim, 2013, Int. J. High Perform. Comput. Appl., 27, 454, 10.1177/1094342013492446 · DOI
  5. Sáez, 2015, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 640, 12064, 10.1088/1742-6596/640/1/012064 · DOI
  6. Surmin, 2016, Comput. Phys. Comm., 202, 204, 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.004 · DOI
  7. Beck, 2019, Comput. Phys. Comm.
  8. Dagum, 1998, IEEE Comput. Sci. Eng., 5, 46, 10.1109/99.660313 · DOI
  9. Decyk, 2004, Comput. Phys. Comm., 164, 80, 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.06.011 · DOI
  10. Decyk, 2011, Comput. Phys. Comm., 182, 641, 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.11.009 · DOI
  11. Decyk, 2014, Comput. Phys. Comm., 185, 708, 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.10.013 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2012, J. Comput. Phys., 231, 5374, 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.04.040 · DOI
  13. Kong, 2011, J. Comput. Phys., 230, 1676, 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.11.032 · DOI
  14. Hariri, 2016, Comput. Phys. Comm.
  15. Stantchev, 2008, J. Parallel Distrib. Comput., 68, 1339, 10.1016/j.jpdc.2008.05.009 · DOI
  16. Tskhakaya, 2007, J. Comput. Phys., 225, 829, 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Sun, 2016, Comput. Phys. Comm., 206, 35, 10.1016/j.cpc.2016.05.003 · DOI
  18. Fierro, 2013, APS, ET2
  19. Fierro, 2014, Phys. Plasmas, 21, 10.1063/1.4903330 · DOI
  20. Sohn, 2016, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 44, 1823, 10.1109/TPS.2016.2593491 · DOI
  21. Claustre, 2013, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 41, 391, 10.1109/TPS.2012.2234402 · DOI
  22. Hur, 2019, Plasma Res. Express, 1, 10.1088/2516-1067/ab0918 · DOI
  23. Mertmann, 2011, Comput. Phys. Comm., 182, 2161, 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.05.012 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Verboncoeur, 2005, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 47, A231, 10.1088/0741-3335/47/5A/017 · DOI
  25. Donkó, 2011, Plasma Sources. Sci. Technol., 20, 10.1088/0963-0252/20/2/024001 · DOI
  26. Turner, 2006, Phys. Plasmas, 13, 10.1063/1.2169752 · DOI
  27. Erden, 2014, Contrib. Plasma Phys., 54, 626, 10.1002/ctpp.201300047 · DOI
  28. Phelps, 1994, J. Appl. Phys., 76, 747, 10.1063/1.357820 · DOI
  29. Hartmann, 2020, Plasma Sources. Sci. Technol., 29, 10.1088/1361-6595/ab9374 · DOI
  30. Press, 2007
  31. Zhang, 2010, ACM SIGPLAN Not., 45, 127, 10.1145/1837853.1693472 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Juhasz, Z., Ďurian, J., Derzsi, A., Matejčík, Š., Donkó, Z., & Hartmann, P.
Affiliations
  • Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
  • HUN-REN Wigner Research Centre for Physics (HU)
Venue
Computer Physics Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
263
Pages
107913
ISSN
0010-4655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134899006
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computer Physics Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Repository of the Academy's Library (Library of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
  • Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave (UK/180/2020)
  • Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (2020-4.1.1, TKP2020-IKA-07)
  • Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja (APVV-19-0386)
  • Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (FK-128924, K-134462)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-Pressure Plasma Processing and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
Keywords
GPU computing, particle-in-cell simulation, Monte Carlo collisions, capacitively coupled plasma, low-pressure plasma, CUDA, OpenCL, massively parallel simulation, performance optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient GPU implementation of the Particle-in-Cell/Monte-Carlo collisions method for 1D simulation of low-pressure capacitively coupled plasmas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107913
The paper
Juhasz, Z., Ďurian, J., Derzsi, A., Matejčík, Š., Donkó, Z., & Hartmann, P. (2021). Efficient GPU implementation of the Particle-in-Cell/Monte-Carlo collisions method for 1D simulation of low-pressure capacitively coupled plasmas. Computer Physics Communications. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107913