Cited by 933Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 135 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder

Bylsma, Lauren M., Morris, Bethany H., Rottenberg, Jonathan·2008·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Three alternative views regarding how Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) alters emotional reactivity have been featured in the literature: positive attenuation (reduced positive reactivity), negative potentiation (increased negative reactivity), and emotion context insensitivity (ECI; reduced positive and negative reactivity). Although empirical studies have accumulated on emotional reactivity in MDD, this report is to our knowledge the first systematic quantitative review of this topic area. In omnibus analyses of 19 laboratory studies comparing the emotional reactivity of healthy individuals to that of individuals with MDD, MDD was characterized by reduced emotional reactivity to both positively and negatively valenced stimuli, with the reduction larger for positive stimuli (d=-.53) than for negative stimuli (d=-.25). Results were similar when 3 major emotion response systems (self-reported experience, expressive behavior, and peripheral physiology) were analyzed individually. The ECI view of emotional reactivity in MDD is well supported by laboratory data. Implications for the understanding of emotions in MDD are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001

Cites

135 of 135 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 133 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–932 of 932

Metadata

Authors
Bylsma, L. M., Morris, B. H., & Rottenberg, J.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Rottenberg, Jonathan
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
676-691
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035505019
Cited by
933
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 30
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
major depressive disorder, emotional reactivity, expressive behavior
MeSH terms
Affect, Major Depressive Disorder, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review