The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of cognitive bias to food stimuli in people with disordered eating behaviour
Abstract
Aim Maladaptive cognitions about food, weight and shape bias attention, memory and judgment and may be linked to disordered eating behaviour. This paper reviews information processing of food stimuli (words, pictures) in people with eating disorders (ED).Method PubMed, Ovid, ScienceDirect, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched to December 2009. 63 studies measured attention, memory and judgment bias towards food stimuli in women with ED.Results Stroop tasks had sufficient sample size for a meta-analyses and effects ranged from small to medium. Other studies of attention bias had variable effects (e.g. the Dot-Probe task, distracter tasks and Startle Eyeblink Modulation). A meta-analysis of memory bias studies in ED and RE yielded insignificant effect. Effect sizes for judgment bias ranged from negligible to large.Conclusions People with ED have greater attentional bias to food stimuli than healthy controls (HC). Evidence for a memory and judgment bias in ED is limited.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, a number of reviews have reported atypical attentional bias towards disorder specific stimuli (Bar-Haim et al., 2007;Brooks et al., 2011;Cisler and Koster, 2010).”
From Meta-analytic review of the effects of a single dose of intranasal oxytocin on threat processing in humans (2018) · cites this paper as Brooks et al., 2011
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464 · Cited by 9,210
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,657
Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment
Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., & Shafran, R. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00088-8 · Cited by 3,374
Attentional bias in emotional disorders
MacLeod, C., Mathews, A., & Tata, P. (1986) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.95.1.15 · Cited by 3,152
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Brooks, S. J., Uher, R., O'Daly, O., Treasure, J., & Campbell I. C. (in press). Subliminal food stimuli interfere with cognitive processes in women with restricting anorexia nervosa.
- Steichen, 2000, Metatrim: Stata module to perfrom non-parametric analysis of publication bias, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mountjoy, M., Ackerman, K. E., Bailey, D. M., Burke, L. M., Constantini, N., Hackney, A. C., Heikura, I. A., Melin, A., Pensgaard, A. M., Stellingwerff, T., et al. (2023) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2023-106994 · Cited by 724
Clinical Efficacy of Attentional Bias Modification Procedures: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Mogoaşe, C., David, D. O., & Koster, E. H. W. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22081 · Cited by 386
Attentional bias to pain-related information: a meta-analysis.
Crombez, G., Van Ryckeghem, D. M. L., Eccleston, C., & Van Damme, S. (2013) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.11.013 · Cited by 334
O'Hara, C., Campbell, I. C., & Schmidt, U. H. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.02.012 · Cited by 271
Self-citationDifferential neural responses to food images in women with bulimia versus anorexia nervosa
Brooks, S. J., O′Daly, O. G., Uher, R., Friederich, H.-C., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M., Williams, S. C. R., Schiöth, H. B., Treasure, J., & Campbell, I. C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022259 · Cited by 231
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Brooks, S., Prince, A., Stahl, D., Campbell, I. C., & Treasure, J.
- Affiliations
- King's College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Brooks, Samantha
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-51
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965590380
- Semantic Scholar
- ba65340bcb8eb74d74c5d76554efeab0c124160e
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- disordered eating, eating disorders, cognitive biases, food stimuli, attentional bias, memory bias, judgment bias, Stroop task, dot-probe task, women
- MeSH terms
- Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attention, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
