The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dropout from individual psychotherapy for major depression: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Abstract
Dropout from mental health treatment poses a substantial problem, but rates vary substantially across studies and diagnoses. Focused reviews are needed to provide more detailed estimates for specific areas of research. Randomized clinical trials involving individual psychotherapy for unipolar depression are ubiquitous and important, but empirical data on average dropout rates from these studies is lacking. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of 54 such studies (N=5852) including 80 psychotherapy conditions, and evaluated a number of predictors of treatment- and study-level dropout rates. Our overall weighted dropout estimates were 19.9% at the study level, and 17.5% for psychotherapy conditions specifically. Therapy orientation did not significantly account for variance in dropout estimates, but estimates were significantly higher in psychotherapy conditions with more patients of minority racial status or with comorbid personality disorders. Treatment duration was also positively associated with dropout rates at trend level. Studies with an inactive control comparison had higher dropout rates than those without such a condition. Limitations include the inability to test certain potential predictors (e.g., socioeconomic status) due to infrequent reporting. Overall, our findings suggest the need to consider how specific patient and study characteristics may influence dropout rates in clinical research on individual therapy for depression.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A more focused meta-analysis reviewing only individual psychotherapy for major depression found a similar drop-out rate of 19.9% (Cooper & Conklin, 2015).”
From Acceptability and Feasibility of an Intervention to Enhance Social Group Belonging: Evidence From Three Trials of Groups 4 Health (2022) · cites this paper as Cooper & Conklin, 2015
In the citing paper
“First, Copper and Conklin found an increased attrition risk of 23.5% from trials involving an inactive control condition (which is relevant to Phases I and II of our data here).”
From Acceptability and Feasibility of an Intervention to Enhance Social Group Belonging: Evidence From Three Trials of Groups 4 Health (2022) · cites this paper as Cooper & Conklin, 2015
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 · Cited by 3,053
Transformations Related to the Angular and the Square Root
Freeman, M. F., & Tukey, J. W. (1950) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729756 · Cited by 2,634
Antidepressant Drug Effects and Depression Severity: A Patient-Level Meta-analysis
Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Dimidjian, S., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., & Fawcett, J. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1943 · Cited by 2,009
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Light, R. J., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291021 · Cited by 1,880
Dimidjian, S., Hollon, S. D., Dobson, K. S., Schmaling, K. B., Kohlenberg, R. J., Addis, M. E., Gallop, R., McGlinchey, J. B., Markley, D. K., Gollan, J. K., et al. (2006) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.74.4.658 · Cited by 1,607
George, S., Duran, N., & Norris, K. (2014) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301706 · Cited by 1,603
Jones, H. E. (2010) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01108.x · Cited by 1,447
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Higgins, 2011, Chapter eight: Assessing risk of bias in included studies
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carlbring, P., Andersson, G., Cuijpers, P., Riper, H., & Hedman-Lagerlöf, E. (2018) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115 · Cited by 1,232
“In fact, the average dropout rate across the studies was 15.7%, which is perfectly in line with a recent meta-analysis on dropouts from individual psychotherapy for major depression (Cooper & Conklin, 2015).”
ResultInfluentialLewis, C., Roberts, N. P., Gibson, S., & Bisson, J. I. (2020) · European Journal of Psychotraumatology · doi:10.1080/20008198.2019.1709709 · Cited by 382
“5% obtained from a meta-analysis of dropout from RCTs of psychotherapy for depression [24] that defined dropout as unexpected attrition among individuals who were randomized to a treatment but failed to complete it.”
BackgroundStubbs, B., Vancampfort, D., Rosenbaum, S., Ward, P. B., Richards, J., Soundy, A., Veronese, N., Solmi, M., & Schuch, F. B. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.019 · Cited by 284
“Unsurprisingly, dropouts from treatment represent a major barrier that preclude an individual benefitting from an intervention and appear to be a particular problem in people with depression (Cooper and Conklin, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe Role of Exercise in Preventing and Treating Depression
Schuch, F. B., & Stubbs, B. (2019) · Current Sports Medicine Reports · doi:10.1249/jsr.0000000000000620 · Cited by 298
“For example, dropout rate from psychotherapies, in general, is about 19% (50) while the dropout rate from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are about 26% and tricyclics about 28% (51).”
BackgroundInternet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Current Progress and Future Directions
Webb, C. A., Rosso, I. M., & Rauch, S. L. (2017) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000139 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, A. A., & Conklin, L. R.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cooper, Andrew A.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 57-65
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W243214355
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 35 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- treatment discontinuation, individual psychotherapy, major depressive disorder, predictors of dropout, personality disorders, treatment duration, psychotherapy research
- MeSH terms
- Major Depressive Disorder, Humans, Patient Dropouts, Psychotherapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
