Cited by 462Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Evaluating factors and interventions that influence help-seeking and mental health service utilization among suicidal individuals: A review of the literature

Hom, Melanie A., Stanley, Ian H., Joiner, Thomas E.·2015·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Connecting suicidal individuals to appropriate mental health care services is a key component of suicide prevention efforts. This review aims to critically discuss the extant literature on help-seeking and mental health service utilization among individuals at elevated risk for suicide, as well as to outline challenges and future directions for research in this area. Across studies, the rate of mental health service use for those with past-year suicide ideation, plans, and/or attempts was approximately 29.5% based on weighted averages, with a lack of perceived need for services, preference for self-management, fear of hospitalization, and structural factors (e.g., time, finances) identified as key barriers to care. Studies also revealed facilitators to care, which include mental health literacy, positive views of services, and encouragement from family or friends to seek support. To address these low rates of help-seeking and barriers to care, a number of interventions have been developed, including psychoeducation-based programs, peer and gatekeeper training, and screening-based approaches. Despite these efforts, it appears that work is still needed to gauge the impact of these interventions on behavioral outcomes and to more rigorously test their effectiveness. Additional implications for future research on help-seeking among suicidal individuals are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 112 · Cited by 462

Authors
Hom, M. A., Stanley, I. H., & Joiner, T. E.
Affiliations
Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hom, Melanie A.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
40
Pages
28-39
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W368221195
Cited by
462
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
help-seeking, mental health service utilization, suicide, suicide prevention, barriers to care, facilitators of care, mental health literacy, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, psychoeducation, screening, self-management
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Humans, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Suicide, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review