Cited by 87Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive behaviour therapy for generalized anxiety disorder: is CBT equally efficacious in adults of working age and older adults?

Open access
Kishita, Naoko, Laidlaw, Ken·2017·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The current meta-analysis compared the efficacy of CBT for GAD between adults of working age and older people. In addition, we conducted a qualitative content analysis of treatment protocols used in studies with older clients to explore potential factors that may enhance treatment outcomes with this particular client group. Applying the inclusion criteria resulted in the identification of 15 studies with 22 comparisons between CBT and control groups (770 patients). When examining overall effect sizes for CBT for GAD between older people and adults of working age there were no statistically significant differences in outcome. However, overall effect size of CBT for GAD was moderate for older people (g=0.55, 95% CI 0.22-0.88) and large for adults of working age (g=0.94, 95% CI 0.52-1.36), suggesting that there is still room for improvement in CBT with older people. The main difference in outcome between CBT for GAD between the two age groups was related to methodological quality in that no older people studies used an intention-to-treat design. The content analysis demonstrated that studies with older clients were conducted according to robust CBT protocols but did not take account of gerontological evidence to make them more age-appropriate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.01.003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT for GAD is less effective for older adults compared with younger adults.

    “Research on the efficacy of CBT for GAD across age generally suggests treatment is less effective for older adults compared with younger adults (Covin et al ., 2008; Hanrahan et al ., 2013; Kishita and Laidlaw, 2017)”

    From Effectiveness and predictors of group cognitive behaviour therapy outcome for generalised anxiety disorder in an out-patient hospital setting (2024) · cites this paper as Kishita and Laidlaw, 2017

    The Conclusion (pp. 25–26) states the opposite: CBT for GAD in older people is as efficacious as it is in adults of working age. It attributes the main difference in reported outcomes to methodological quality, not lower efficacy in older adults. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When compared to active control conditions, effect sizes favoring CBT are small in samples of older adults with anxiety symptoms and/or disorders.

    “when compared to active control conditions, effect sizes favoring CBT are small in samples of older adults with anxiety symptoms and/or disorders [17].”

    From Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention vs. a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy intervention for older adults with anxiety symptoms: A randomized controlled trial (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Exclusion and inclusion criteria (page unavailable) state that the meta-analysis required non-active controls and excluded studies using psychological treatments as comparators. The Overall Mean Effect Sizes section (page unavailable) reports a medium effect for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.55), not a small effect against active controls. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence of lower efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for generalised anxiety disorder in older people than in working-age adults suggests that an alternative form of psychological intervention may be required.

    “However, evidence of a lower efficacy of cognitive behavioural therapy for generalised anxiety disorder in older people than in working-age adults suggests that an alternative form of psychological intervention may be required.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: The FACTOID feasibility study (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Results (page unavailable) found a smaller average CBT effect for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder, but the difference from working-age adults was not statistically significant. The Discussion (page unavailable) calls for caution and proposes age-informed adaptations to CBT, rather than saying a different form of psychological intervention is required. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence suggests lower efficacy of CBT for GAD in older people than in working-age adults.

    “evidence of lower efficacy of CBT for GAD in older people than in working-age adults suggests that an alternative form of psychological intervention may be required.”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy for older people with treatment-resistant generalised anxiety disorder: The FACTOID feasibility study (2021) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion reports a moderate CBT effect size for older adults versus a large one for working-age adults, which supports a suggestion of lower efficacy. But it also says the difference was not statistically significant, and the Conclusion states that CBT was as efficacious in both groups. The claim omits those important qualifications. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CBT also works well when delivered remotely, and to a lesser extent in the elderly.

    “CBT also works well when delivered remotely [107], and to a lesser extent in the elderly [108,109].”

    From Cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for the discontinuation of long-term benzodiazepine use in insomnia and anxiety disorders (2021) · cites this paper as [109]

    The Results report a significant moderate CBT effect for older adults with generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.55), smaller than the large effect for working-age adults (g = 0.94). But the age-group difference was not statistically significant (p = .144), so the unqualified claim that CBT works to a lesser extent in older adults overstates the evidence. The remote-delivery clause is attached to a different citation and is not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 87

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [32]32. Laidlaw, K. (2015). Cognitive behaviour therapy for older people: An introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  2. [63]63. Biswas, A., Biswas, D., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (1995). Cognitive behaviour therapy in generalised anxiety disorder. Indian Journal of Clinical Psychology, 22, 1-10.
  3. [76]76. Zargar, F., Farid, A. A. A., Atef-Vahid, M.-K., Afshar, H., & Omidi, A. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of acceptance-based behavior therapy and applied relaxation on acceptance of internal experiences, engagement in valued actions and quality of life in generalized anxiety disorder. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 18(2), 118-122.

Authors
Kishita, N., & Laidlaw, K.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Corresponding author
Laidlaw, Ken
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
52
Pages
124-136
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2572310047
Cited by
87
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, generalized anxiety disorder, older adults, working-age adults, treatment protocols, methodological quality, intention-to-treat analysis
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review