The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 7 are not checked yet.
A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression
Open accessAbstract
Interpretation biases have long been theorized to play a central role in depression. Yet, the strength of the empirical evidence for this bias remains a topic of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall effect size and to identify moderators relevant to theory and methodology. PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and dissertation databases were searched. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on 87 studies (N=9443). Results revealed a medium overall effect size (g=0.72, 95%-CI:[0.62;0.82]). Equivalent effect sizes were observed for patients diagnosed with clinical depression (g=0.60, 95%-CI:[0.37;0.75]), patients remitted from depression (g=0.59, 95%-CI:[0.33;0.86]), and undiagnosed individuals reporting elevated depressive symptoms (g=0.66, 95%-CI:[0.47;0.84]). The effect size was larger for self-referential stimuli (g=0.90, 95%-CI[0.78;1.01]), but was not modified by the presence (g=0.74, 95%-CI[0.59;0.90]) or absence (g=0.72, 95%-CI[0.58;0.85]) of mental imagery instructions. Similar effect sizes were observed for a negative interpretation bias (g=0.58, 95%-CI:[0.40;0.75]) and lack of a positive interpretation bias (g=0.60, 95%-CI:[0.36;0.85]). The effect size was only significant when interpretation bias was measured directly (g=0.88, 95%-CI[0.77;0.99]), but not when measured indirectly (g=0.04, 95%-CI[-0.14;0.22]). It is concluded that depression is associated with interpretation biases, but caution is necessary because methodological factors shape conclusions. Implications and recommendations for future research are outlined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This linkage across negative beliefs, subsequent psychopathology, and examining and restructuring these beliefs to reduce depression is well established (e.g., Everaert et al., 2017; Diehle et al., 2014).”
From I've Seen Enough: Measuring the Toll of Content Moderation on Mental Health (2025) · cites this paper as Everaert et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Williams, J. B. W., & First, M. B. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199975839.013.104 · Cited by 109,845
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_121117 · Cited by 20,772
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (2015) · doi:10.4135/9781483398105 · Cited by 5,542
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses
Riley, R. D., Higgins, J. P. T., & Deeks, J. J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d549 · Cited by 2,884
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dickson, 2015, Investigating the role of cognitive biases as a risk factor for depression (Dissertation Abstracts International)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–377 of 377
Cludius, B., Hummel, J., Limburg, K., Woud, M. L., & Takano, K. (2023) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2022.101811
Wie, M. V. (2022) · MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) · doi:10.32469/10355/94194
Neural Correlates of Interpretation Processing Biases
Feng, Y.-C., & Hirsch, C. R. (2023) · CBT: science into practice · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23650-1_9
Uncovering Negative Interpretation Bias in Remitted/Recovered Depression with Laboratory Task
Dolatshahi, B., Rajeh, Y. N., Pourshahbaz, A., & Zarghami, M. (2023) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12367
“Such a finding could represent vulnerabilities to incidence, recurrence, and relapse (1).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation normalises learning rate adjustment in low moodPreprint
Sarrazin, V., Overman, M. J., Mezossy-Dona, L., Browning, M. D., & O’Shea, J. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.04.24.23289064
“Compared to healthy controls, individuals with depressive symptoms remember more negative words (7), perceive feedback as more negative (8) and tend to interpret ambiguous information as negative (9).”
BackgroundBlackwell, S. E., Wilhelm, F. H., Reinecke, A., Margraf, J., & Woud, M. L. (2023) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10384-7 · Cited by 1
ghazanfari, N., Khademi, A., Alilou, M. M., Etemadnia, M., & Dousti, R. (2023) · doi:10.61838/kman.aftj.4.1.26
Mobile Cognitive Interventions in Mental Disorders
Blomberg, M. (2024) · eDiss (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) · doi:10.53846/goediss-10652
Rajeh, Y. N., Blackwell, S. E., Dolatshahi, B., Pourshahbaz, A., & Zarghami, M. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e97gz
Ferguson, I., George, G. C., Wu, C. S.-Y., Xu, I., Passel, E., Germine, L. T., & Beard, C. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10523-8
The associations between rumination, interpretation bias and interpretation flexibility
Nebashi, T., & Matsumoto, N. (2024) · The Japanese Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.5265/jcogpsy.22.1
Griffith, J. M., Long, E. E., & Hankin, B. L. (2025) · Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology · doi:10.1007/s10802-025-01306-0
“…finding is consistent with theoretical work which posits that depressive symptoms contribute to the systematic downregulation of positive emotional experiences, which in turn serves to reduce positive emotion and exacerbate symptoms (Carl et al., 2013; Everaert et al., 2017; Phillips et al., 2010).”
Blaha, Y., Cavelti, M., Sele, S., Koenig, J., Zimmermann, R., Schmeck, K., & Kaess, M. (2025) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000547941
Differences between persistent and episodic depression in processing novel positive information
Κube, T., Rapo, E., Houben, M., Gärtner, T., Brakemeier, E., Glombiewski, J. A., & Rief, W. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725101530
Hsu, C.-W., Robbins, A., & Cartwright, T. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-7530420/v1
Franzen, M., de Jong, P. J., Veenstra, R., & Rot, M. A. H. (2025) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605251375381 · Cited by 1
Self-esteem modulates beneficial causal attributions in the formation of novel self-beliefsPreprint
Mayer, A. V., Schröder, A., Stolz, D. S., Czekalla, N., Paulus, F. M., Müller‐Pinzler, L., Krach, S., & Κube, T. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.27.684784
Early Childhood Educator Stress, Burnout, and Racial Equity Beliefs
Merculief, A., Omar, J., Aguilar, G., Steyer, L., & Obradović, J. (2025) · Early Childhood Education Journal · doi:10.1007/s10643-025-02037-z
Meyerhöfer, S., Ottenstein, C., Kirchner, L., Müller‐Pinzler, L., Krach, S., & Κube, T. (2025) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026251375886
Blomberg, M., Zech, H., Kluge, M., Böhmert, N., Platte, H., & Brockmeyer, T. (2025) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/69033
“Cognitive biases are systematic biases in information processing [7], with memory [8], attention [9], and interpretation biases [10] most frequently studied.”
Losing oneself: Lack of self in depression and its recurrence
Townsend, C., Kulke, M., Perkovic, S. J. M., Dobson, K. S., Lam, R. W., Quilty, L. C., & Quigley, L. (2025) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120952
Blanco, I., Boemo, T., Martín-García, Ó., Koster, E. H. W., Raedt, R. D., & Sanchez-Lopez, A. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26587950
Self-citationNeuroticism and Interpretive Bias as Risk Factors for Anxiety and DepressionPreprint
Zinbarg, R. E., Craske, M. G., Williams, A., & Vinograd, M. (2020) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
Farahnak, F., & Safarzadeh, S. (2025) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x2510038x
“Evidence of interpretation bias has been observed in studies by Everaert et al .”
Quinn, M. E., Bean, C. A. L., Summers, C. B., & Ciesla, J. A. (2026) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-025-10707-w
The good judge of intelligence
Heine, C., Zimmermann, J., Leising, D., & Dufner, M. (2026) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2025.101994
Negative cognitive biases in older adults with subthreshold depression
He, R., Li, J., Qiu, Y., Jiao, Y., Huang, K., Han, B., Pu, Y., Jia, Y., & Chen, L. (2026) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2026.102087
Spaeth, A. M., Koenig, S., Everaert, J., Glombiewski, J. A., & Κube, T. (2026) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.104985
Self-citationLin, C. C., Manathungage, O., & Hsu, C.-W. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121493
Bai, A., Pei, C., Li, X., Zhu, X., & Huo, L. (2026) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-026-03857-2 · Cited by 1
Ladis, I., & Teachman, B. A. (2026) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.105007
Precariousness and depressed mood: a network analysis in the multi-ethnic HELIUS study
Elsenburg, L. K., Stronks, K., Galenkamp, H., Lakerveld, J., Lok, A., Park, K., de Vasconcelos, V. V. L., & Nicolaou, M. (2026) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-026-03072-w
“Furthermore, negative mood states may contribute to cognitive biases, which can lead individuals to perceive social and financial difficulties as more severe or insurmountable than they objectively are [42, 43].”
Sawada, Y., Edgar, E. V., Ibrahim, K., Reid, L., Polack, R. G., Bloch, M. H., & Crowley, M. J. (2026) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhag031
Algermissen, J., Weber, L. A. E., Rascu, M., & Klein-Flügge, M. C. (2025) · doi:10.17605/osf.io/wq7cg
Cruz, I. P., MacNeil, S., Renaud, J., & Gouin, J. (2026) · Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior · doi:10.1111/sltb.70096
“…MDD might have fewer occasions to engage in capitalization as they tend to be less likely to select situations that can elicit positive emotional experiences (Carvalho and Hopko 2011) and, simultaneously, less likely to interpret daily events as positive (Beblo et al. 2012; Everaert et al. 2017).”
Karamanlı, K. A., Yiend, J., Al-Jaboby, S., Ceachir, I., Fialho, C., Jia, Z., John, J., Markham, S., Moloney, H., Ricci, T., et al. (2026) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-026-09668-6
“The central role of interpretation bias (i.e. the mechanism targeted by CBM-I) has been consistently demonstrated in depression by meta-analyses on cross-sectional [9], longitudinal [10], and experimental studies modifying interpretation bias to reduce depressive symptoms [6].”
Self-citationUrrutia, C. F. (2026) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3772363.3799199
“Second, psychological distress surveys (either paper-and-pencil or digital) are often cumbersome to administer during a patient’s visit, and many patients find completing the same survey multiple times repetitive and taxing [8, 9].”
Evaluating biomarkers and prediction models with E2P SimulatorPreprint
Karvelis, P., Felsky, D., Abi-Dargham, A., Horga, G., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.110646.1
Evaluating biomarkers and prediction models with E2P SimulatorPreprint
Karvelis, P., Felsky, D., Abi-Dargham, A., Horga, G., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.110646
Abapolnikova, M., Coyne, A. E., Glushka, L. R., Liu, C. J., Constantino, M. J., Atkinson, L. R., Bagby, R. M., Ravitz, P., & McBride, C. (2026) · Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1080/10503307.2026.2656698
Is seeing believing? Linking fixation bias and flexibility with interpretation flexibility
Deng, W., Zwalmen, Y. V., Zhu, Y., Galusha, H., Cannon, T. D., & Joormann, J. (2026) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2026.2661708
Feldman, S. B.-Z., Dayan, O., Somerville, Y., Kao, C.-H., Cohen, S., Glickman, O., Ruiz, S. G., Newsome, P., Linke, J. O., Shechner, T., et al. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-46946-4 · Cited by 1
Psychometric properties of the Probability Bias Measure
Booth, R. W., Aydın, G. N., Başara, B., & Yılmaz, C. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346803 · Cited by 1
Self-Esteem and Depression Severity in Hospitalized Adolescents with Depression
程, 静. (2026) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2026.164213
Muñoz-Conejo, I., Huguet, A., Sánchez‐López, Á., & Blanco, I. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.121909
Thompson, K. N., Couvy‐Duchesne, B., Lee, S., Geurgas, R., Jeong, Y., Arirangan, S., Newman, S., Tropf, F. C., & Wedow, R. (2026) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s00127-026-03098-0
“Second, shared-method variance, exposure-outcome proximity, and symptom-related reporting effects may influence these associations, as depressive symptoms can shape how individuals perceive and report their experiences [45].”
Rho, K., Kataria, A., Birch, S., & LeMoult, J. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16050705
“…pointed out that, in the SST, participants need to actively evaluate and select between alternative sentences (i.e., positive versus negative), and participants may be influenced by demand characteristics as the purpose of the SST may be easy to infer (Everaert et al., 2017; Phillips & Hine, 2013).”
InfluentialAssociations between family cohesion, stress and digital self-regulation in young adults
Ökten, B. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1842874
“With this perspective, they also form pessimistic expectations for the future (Everaert et al., 2017).”
Sîrbu, V., David, O. A., Sánchez‐López, Á., & Blanco, I. (2026) · Cognitive Behaviour Therapy · doi:10.1080/16506073.2026.2668692
Depression and accuracy of judgment: A meta-analysis
Yeung, J. C., Lam, H., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2026) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102752
Geng, F.-L., Guo, R., & Shao, Y. (2026) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2026.05.031
The Association Between Body Image and Depression: Historical Evolution and Recent Research Progress
Xu, Y., & Zhong, B. (2026) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s593127
Ferrer‐Cascales, R., Costa-López, B., Ruiz‐Robledillo, N., Delvecchio, E., & Albaladejo-Blázquez, N. (2026) · Discover Psychology · doi:10.1007/s44202-026-00742-3
“…cognitive models suggest that anxiety is primarily characterized by heightened sensitivity to potential threats, uncertainty, and future-oriented processing, whereas depression is more closely linked to hopelessness-related cognitions, negative expectations, and reduced perceived control [45, 46].”
Valence as a Construct of the Perceiver: Insights from Studies of Valence Ambiguity
Pierce, J. E., & Neta, M. (2026) · Affective Science · doi:10.1007/s42761-026-00384-7
Philosophical theorising about the rumination of depression
Lange, V. (2026) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.70050
ТҰЛҒАНЫҢ ПСИХОЭМОЦИОНАЛДЫҚ ЖАҒДАЙЫН ҚАЛПЫНА КЕЛТІРУДЕГІ КОГНИТИВТІ-МІНЕЗ-ҚҰЛЫҚТЫҚ ТЕРАПИЯНЫҢ РӨЛІ
Kaziev, K. O., А.М., С., & Sharifzoda, S. (2026) · Научный журнал "Вестник Актюбинского регионального университета имени К Жубанова" · doi:10.70239/arsu.2026.t84.n2.16
Williamson, V. G., Allen, N. B., & Pfeifer, J. H. (2026) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2026.06.010 · Cited by 2
Cognitive Distortions Are Not Logical Errors: A Conceptual Clarification
Денисова, В. Г., & Petrović, N. (2026) · Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1007/s10942-026-00668-8
“Similarly, work on depression and anxiety highlights negative interpretation biases, where individuals disproportionately draw negative inductive inferences from ambiguous stimuli (Everaert et al., 2017).”
The dark side of social support: How social identification shapes its effects on depression
Theisges, L., Cruwys, T., Kaluza, A. J., & van Dick, R. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jadr.2026.101138
Star, A. P., Bachner, Y. G., Tsur, N., Shmueli, M., & O’Rourke, N. (2026) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-026-28582-9
“The finding that active nonsocial use predicted online social support only for dysphoric participants may reflect differences in how online behavior is experienced and interpreted [16].”
InfluentialHsu, C.-W., Drummond, A., Buckingham, A., Cong, K. L., & Carson, K. (2026) · International Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/00207411.2026.2705598
Cross‐Lagged Panel Network Analysis of Resilience and Depression in Disadvantaged Adolescents
Li, Q., Yan, W., Ren, H., Liu, X., Zhou, F., & Wang, W.-L. (2026) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.70244
Emotional processing biases in the longitudinal course of major depressive disorder
Hierl, K., Wollweber, L., Lemke, H., Esser, L., Abati, C., Grotegerd, D., Dohm, K., Kraus, A., Leehr, E. J., Kjærstad, H. L., et al. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122362
Examining Moderators of Outcomes in a Smartphone-Delivered Interpretation Bias Intervention
Shin, D. E., Silverman, A. L., Rotta, G. K., Ferguson, I., Tuck, A. B., & Beard, C. (2026) · The Behavior Therapist · doi:10.1016/j.beth.2026.08.002
Everaert, J., Folgado-Alufre, M., Winer, E. S., & Bronstein, M. V. (2026) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2026.105149 · Cited by 1
Self-citationQiu, L., Deng, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Wang, T., & Yang, Q. (2026) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2026.122510
Workplace discrimination in relation to mental well-being and suicidal ideation
Weinmann, T., Herbig, B., & Sischka, P. E. (2026) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2026.119869
McAdams, E., Quinton, A. M. G., Charlton, R. A., Happé, F., & Stewart, G. R. (2026) · Autism · doi:10.1177/13623613261486059 · Cited by 1
Interpretation biases in child and youth depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Mayr, L. M., Salemink, E., Waters, A. M., & Platt, B. (2026) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-026-03198-x
Upadhyay, D., Acharya, B., Maharjan, K., Poudel, N., Neupane, B., & Dhakal, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10722803/v1
Claus, L., Raulfs, F., Goltermann, J., Driessen, M., & Steuwe, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1897870
Gazzano, V., Ciurli, L., Curadi, M. C., Baragli, P., Gazzano, A., & Ogi, A. (2026) · Frontiers in Veterinary Science · doi:10.3389/fvets.2026.1926433
“Cognitive bias is an umbrella concept encompassing systematic affect-related changes across several domains of information processing, including attention, memory, perception, and judgment (10, 11).”
Deng, H., 王亚卿, Liu, Q., wang, W., 刘晓红, Wang, X., Gao, X., 周振和, & Zhou, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10751143/v1
Hong, S., Jameson, T., Jopling, E. N., Rnic, K., Battaglini, A. M., Grocott, B. B., Tracy, A., Sánchez-López, Á., & LeMoult, J. (2026) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1002/jad.70303
Metadata
- Authors
- Everaert, J., Podina, I. R., & Koster, E. H. W.
- Affiliations
- Ghent University (BE)
- University of Bucharest (RO)
- Corresponding author
- Everaert, Jonas
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 58
- Pages
- 33-48
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2756528888
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2026: 59 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 5.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Universiteit Gent
- Universitatea din București
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- interpretation bias, depression, cognitive biases, negative interpretation bias, mental imagery, depression remission, depressive symptoms
- MeSH terms
- Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review